Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Reasoning (QSR) is concerned with constraint-based formalisms for representing, and reasoning with, spatial and temporal information over infinite domains.  Within the QSR community it has been a widely accepted assumption that genuine qualitative reasoning methods outperform other reasoning methods that are applicable to encodings of qualitative CSP instances. Recently this assumption has been tackled by several authors, who proposed to encode qualitative CSP instances as finite CSP or SAT instances. In this paper we report on the results of a broad empirical study in which we compared the performance of several reasoners on instances from different qualitative formalisms. Our results show that for small-sized qualitative calculi (e.g., Allen's interval algebra and RCC-8) a state-of-the-art implementation of QSR methods currently gives the most efficient performance. However, on recently suggested large-size calculi, e.g., OPRA4, finite CSP encodings provide a considerable performance gain. These results confirm a conjecture by Bessière stating that support-based constraint propagation algorithms provide better performance for large-sized qualitative calculi.

This paper presents a new analysis of dynamic constraint satisfaction problems (DCSPs) with finite domains and a new approach to solving them. We first show that even very small changes in a CSP, in the form of addition of constraints or changes in constraint relations, can have profound effects on search performance. These effects are reflected in the amenability of the problem to different forms of heuristic action as well as overall quality of search. In addition, classical DCSP methods perform poorly on these problems because there are sometimes no solutions similar to the original one found. We then show that the same changes do not markedly affect the locations of the major sources of contention in the problem. A technique for iterated sampling that performs a careful assessment of this property and uses the information during subsequent search, performs well even when it only uses information based on the original problem in the DCSP sequence. The result is a new approach to solving DCSPs that is based on a robust strategy for ordering variables rather than on robust solutions.

We present a new algorithm for computing upper bounds for an optimization version of the EMAJSAT problem called functional E-MAJSAT. The algorithm utilizes the compilation language d- DNNF which underlies several state-of-the-art algorithms for solving related problems. This bound computation can be used in a branch-and-bound solver for solving functional E-MAJSAT. We then present a technique for pruning values from the branch-and-bound search tree based on the information available after each bound computation. We evaluated the proposed techniques in a MAP solver and a probabilistic conformant planner. In both cases, our experiments showed that the new techniques improved the efficiency of state-of-the-art solvers by orders of magnitude.

Hard and soft precedence constraints  play  a key role in many application domains.  In telecommunications, one application is the configuration of call control feature subscriptions  where the task is to sequence a set of user-selected features subject to a set of hard (catalogue) precedence constraints and a set of soft (user-selected) precedence constraints. When no such consistent sequence exists, the task is to find an optimal relaxation by discarding some  features or user precedences. For this purpose, we present the global constraint SOFTPREC. Enforcing Generalized Arc Consistency  (GAC)  on SOFTPREC is NP-complete. Therefore, we approximate  GAC based on domain pruning  rules that follow from the semantics of  SOFTPREC; this pruning is polynomial. Empirical results demonstrate  that  the search effort  required by SOFTPREC is  up to one order of magnitude less than  the previously known best CP approach for the feature subscription problem. SOFTPREC is also applicable to other  problem domains  including minimum  cutset problems  for which initial experiments confirm the interest.

Set variables in constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) are typically propagated by enforcing set bounds consistency together with cardinality reasoning, which uses some inference rules involving the cardinality of a set variable to produce more prunings than set bounds propagation alone. Multiset variables are a generalization of set variables by allowing the elements to have repetitions. In this paper, we generalize cardinality reasoning for multiset variables. In addition, we propose to exploit the variety of a multiset — the number of distinct elements in it — to improve modeling expressiveness and further enhance constraint propagation. We derive a number of inference rules involving the varieties of multiset variables. The rules interact varieties with the traditional components of multiset variables (such as cardinalities) to obtain stronger propagation. We also demonstrate how to apply the rules to perform variety reasoning on some common multiset constraints. Experimental results show that performing variety reasoning on top of cardinality reasoning can effectively reduce more search space and achieve better runtime in solving multiset CSPs.

Systematic search and local search paradigms for combinatorial problems are generally believed to have complementary strengths. Nevertheless, attempts to combine the power of the two paradigms have had limited success, due in part to the expensive information communication overhead involved. We propose a hybrid strategy based on shared memory, ideally suited for multi-core processor architectures. This method enables continuous information exchange between two solvers without slowing down either of the two. Such a hybrid search strategy is surprisingly effective, leading to substantially better quality solutions to many challenging Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) instances than what the current best exact or heuristic methods yield, and it often achieves this within seconds. This hybrid approach is naturally best suited to MaxSAT instances for which proving unsatisfiability is already hard; otherwise the method falls back to pure local search.

Decomposition is an effective technique for solving discrete Constraint Optimization Problems (COPs) with low tree-width. On problems with high treewidth, however, existing decomposition algorithms offer little advantage over branch and bound search (B&B). In this paper we propose a method for exploiting decomposition on problems with high treewidth. Our technique involves modifying B&B to detect and exploit decomposition on a selected subset of the problem’s objectives. Decompositions over this subset, generated during search, are exploited to compute tighter bounds allowing B&B to prune more of its search space. We present a heuristic for selecting an appropriate subset of objectives—one that readily decomposes during search and yet can still provide good bounds. We demonstrate empirically that our approach can significantly improve B&B’s performance and outperform standard decomposition algorithms on a variety of high tree-width problems.

To harness modern multi-core processors, it is imperative to develop parallel versions of fundamental algorithms. In this paper, we present a general approach to best-first heuristic search in a shared-memory setting. Each thread attempts to expand the most promising open nodes. By using abstraction to partition the state space, we detect duplicate states without requiring frequent locking. We allow speculative expansions when necessary to keep threads busy. We identify and fix potential livelock conditions in our approach, verifying its correctness using temporal logic. In an empirical comparison on STRIPS planning, grid pathfinding, and sliding tile puzzle problems using an 8-core machine, we show that A* implemented in our framework yields faster search than improved versions of previous parallel search proposals. Our approach extends easily to other best-first searches, such as Anytime weighted A*.

The computing industry is currently facing a major architectural shift. Extra computing power is not coming anymore from higher processor frequencies, but from a growing number of computing cores and processors. For AI, and constraint solving in particular, this raises the question of how to scale current solving techniques to massively parallel architectures. While prior work focusses mostly on small scale parallel constraint solving, we conduct the first study on scalability of constraint solving on 100 processors and beyond in this paper. We propose techniques that are simple to apply and show empirically that they scale surprisingly well. These techniques establish a performance baseline for parallel constraint solving technologies against which more sophisticated parallel algorithms need to  compete  in the future.

Real-time heuristic search algorithms are used for planning by agents in situations where a constant-bounded amount of deliberation time is required for each action regardless of the problem size.  Such algorithms interleave their planning and execution to ensure real-time response. Furthermore, to guarantee completeness, they typically store improved heuristic estimates for previously expanded states.  Although subsequent planning steps can benefit from updated heuristic estimates, many of the same states are expanded over and over again.   Here we propose a variant of the A* algorithm, Time-Bounded A* (TBA*), that guarantees real-time response. In the domain of path-finding on video-game maps TBA* expands an order of magnitude fewer states than traditional real-time search algorithms, while finding paths of comparable quality. It reaches the same level of performance as recent state-of-the-art real-time search algorithms but, unlike these, requires neither state-space abstractions nor pre-computed pattern databases.