Over the years, numerous experiments have been accumulated to show that cooperation is not casual and depends on the payoffs of the game. These findings suggest that humans have attitude to cooperation by nature and the same person may act more or less cooperatively depending on the particular payoffs. In other words, people do not act a priori as single agents, but they forecast how the game would be played if they formed coalitions and then they play according to their best forecast. In this paper we formalize this idea and we define a new solution concept for one-shot normal form games. We prove that this \emph{cooperative equilibrium} exists for all finite games and it explains a number of different experimental findings, such as (1) the rate of cooperation in the Prisoner's dilemma depends on the cost-benefit ratio; (2) the rate of cooperation in the Traveler's dilemma depends on the bonus/penalty; (3) the rate of cooperation in the Publig Goods game depends on the pro-capite marginal return and on the numbers of players; (4) the rate of cooperation in the Bertrand competition depends on the number of players; (5) players tend to be fair in the bargaining problem; (6) players tend to be fair in the Ultimatum game; (7) players tend to be altruist in the Dictator game; (8) offers in the Ultimatum game are larger than offers in the Dictator game.

Many multi-agent coordination problems can be represented as DCOPs. Motivated by task allocation in disaster response, we extend standard DCOP models to consider uncertain task rewards where the outcome of completing a task depends on its current state, which is randomly drawn from unknown distributions. The goal of solving this problem is to find a solution for all agents that minimizes the overall worst-case loss. This is a challenging problem for centralized algorithms because the search space grows exponentially with the number of agents and is nontrivial for standard DCOP algorithms we have. To address this, we propose a novel decentralized algorithm that incorporates Max-Sum with iterative constraint generation to solve the problem by passing messages among agents. By so doing, our approach scales well and can solve instances of the task allocation problem with hundreds of agents and tasks.

Multidimensional classification (MDC) is the supervised learning problem where an instance is associated with multiple classes, rather than with a single class, as in traditional classification problems. Since these classes are often strongly correlated, modeling the dependencies between them allows MDC methods to improve their performance - at the expense of an increased computational cost. In this paper we focus on the classifier chains (CC) approach for modeling dependencies, one of the most popular and highestperforming methods for multi-label classification (MLC), a particular case of MDC which involves only binary classes (i.e., labels). The original CC algorithm makes a greedy approximation, and is fast but tends to propagate errors along the chain. Our algorithms remain tractable for high-dimensional data sets and obtain the best predictive performance across several real data sets. Keywords: classifier chains, multidimensional classification, multi-label classification, Monte Carlo methods, Bayesian inference 1. Introduction Multidimensional classification (MDC) is the supervised learning problem where an instance may be associated with multiple classes, rather than Preprint submitted to Pattern Recognition March 22, 2018 with a single class as in traditional binary or multi-class single-dimensional classification (SDC) problems. So-called MDC (e.g., in [1]) is also known in the literature as multi-target, multi-output [2], or multi-objective [3] classification The recently popularised task of multi-label classification (see [4, 5, 6, 7] for overviews) can be viewed as a particular case of the multidimensional problem that only involves binary classes, i.e., labels that can be turned on (1) or off (0) for any data instance. The MDC learning context is receiving increased attention in the literature, since it arises naturally in a wide variety of domains, such as image classification [8, 9], information retrieval and text categorization [10], automated detection of emotions in music [11] or bioinformatics [10, 12].

The use of mixture models for clustering, referred to as model-based clustering, has become increasingly popular since the work of Wolfe (1963). A wide variety of finite mixture models has been studied extensively within the literature to date. Amongst these, the Gaussian mixture model has received special attention due to its mathematical tractability and the relative computational simplicity associated with parameter estimation. However, the Gaussian mixture model is not without limitations; for instance, the component densities are restricted to being symmetric.

In the panoply of pattern classification techniques, few enjoy the intuitive appeal and simplicity of the nearest neighbor rule: given a set of samples in some metric domain space whose value under some function is known, we estimate the function anywhere in the domain by giving the value of the nearest sample per the metric. More generally, one may use the modal value of the m nearest samples, where m is a fixed positive integer (although m=1 is known to be admissible in the sense that no larger value is asymptotically superior in terms of prediction error). The nearest neighbor rule is nonparametric and extremely general, requiring in principle only that the domain be a metric space. The classic paper on the technique, proving convergence under independent, identically-distributed (iid) sampling, is due to Cover and Hart (1967). Because taking samples is costly, there has been much research in recent years on selective sampling, in which each sample is selected from a pool of candidates ranked by a heuristic; the heuristic tries to guess which candidate would be the most "informative" sample. Lindenbaum et al. (2004) apply selective sampling to the nearest neighbor rule, but their approach sacrifices the austere generality of Cover and Hart; furthermore, their heuristic algorithm is complex and computationally expensive. Here we report recent results that enable selective sampling in the original Cover-Hart setting. Our results pose three selection heuristics and prove that their nearest neighbor rule predictions converge to the true pattern. Two of the algorithms are computationally cheap, with complexity growing linearly in the number of samples. We believe that these results constitute an important advance in the art.

We provide an elementary proof of a simple, efficient algorithm for computing the Euclidean projection of a point onto the probability simplex. We also show an application in Laplacian K-modes clustering.

We review attempts that have been made towards understanding the computational properties and mechanisms of input-driven dynamical systems like RNNs, and reservoir computing networks in particular. We provide details on methods that have been developed to give quantitative answers to the questions above. Following this, we show how self-organization may be used to improve reservoirs for better performance, in some cases guided by the measures presented before. We also present a possible way to quantify task performance using an information-theoretic approach, and finally discuss promising future directions aimed at a better understanding of how these systems perform their computations and how to best guide self-organized processes for their optimization.

We have recently presented a general scheme enabling quantum modeling of different types of situations that violate Bell's inequalities. In this paper, we specify this scheme for a combination of two concepts. We work out a quantum Hilbert space model where 'entangled measurements' occur in addition to the expected 'entanglement between the component concepts', or 'state entanglement'. We extend this result to a macroscopic physical entity, the 'connected vessels of water', which maximally violates Bell's inequalities. We enlighten the structural and conceptual analogies between the cognitive and physical situations which are both examples of a nonlocal non-marginal box modeling in our classification.

We put forward a general classification for a structural description of the entanglement present in compound entities experimentally violating Bell's inequalities, making use of a new entanglement scheme that we developed recently. Our scheme, although different from the traditional one, is completely compatible with standard quantum theory, and enables quantum modeling in complex Hilbert space for different types of situations. Namely, situations where entangled states and product measurements appear ('customary quantum modeling'), and situations where states and measurements and evolutions between measurements are entangled ('nonlocal box modeling', 'nonlocal non-marginal box modeling'). The role played by Tsirelson's bound and marginal distribution law is emphasized. Specific quantum models are worked out in detail in complex Hilbert space within this new entanglement scheme.

We describe ways to define and calculate $L_1$-norm signal subspaces which are less sensitive to outlying data than $L_2$-calculated subspaces. We focus on the computation of the $L_1$ maximum-projection principal component of a data matrix containing N signal samples of dimension D and conclude that the general problem is formally NP-hard in asymptotically large N, D. We prove, however, that the case of engineering interest of fixed dimension D and asymptotically large sample support N is not and we present an optimal algorithm of complexity $O(N^D)$. We generalize to multiple $L_1$-max-projection components and present an explicit optimal $L_1$ subspace calculation algorithm in the form of matrix nuclear-norm evaluations. We conclude with illustrations of $L_1$-subspace signal processing in the fields of data dimensionality reduction and direction-of-arrival estimation.