Multivariate clustering in astrophysics is a recent development justified by the bigger and bigger surveys of the sky. The phylogenetic approach is probably the most unexpected technique that has appeared for the unsupervised classification of galaxies, stellar populations or globular clusters. On one side, this is a somewhat natural way of classifying astrophysical entities which are all evolving objects. On the other side, several conceptual and practical difficulties arize, such as the hierarchical representation of the astrophysical diversity, the continuous nature of the parameters, and the adequation of the result to the usual practice for the physical interpretation. Most of these have now been solved through the studies of limited samples of stellar clusters and galaxies. Up to now, only the Maximum Parsimony (cladistics) has been used since it is the simplest and most general phylogenetic technique. Probabilistic and network approaches are obvious extensions that should be explored in the future.

In this paper we study the use of coding techniques to accelerate machine learning (ML). Coding techniques, such as prefix codes, have been extensively studied and used to accelerate low-level data processing primitives such as scans in a relational database system. However, there is little work on how to exploit them to accelerate ML algorithms. In fact, applying coding techniques for faster ML faces a unique challenge: one needs to consider both how the codes fit into the optimization algorithm used to train a model, and the interplay between the model structure and the coding scheme. Surprisingly and intriguingly, our study demonstrates that a slight variant of the classical Lempel-Ziv-Welch (LZW) coding scheme is a good fit for several popular ML algorithms, resulting in substantial runtime savings. Comprehensive experiments on several real-world datasets show that our LZW-based ML algorithms exhibit speedups of up to 31x compared to a popular and state-of-the-art ML library, with no changes to ML accuracy, even though the implementations of our LZW variants are not heavily tuned. Thus, our study reveals a new avenue for accelerating ML algorithms using coding techniques and we hope this opens up a new direction for more research.

The composition of multiple Gaussian Processes as a Deep Gaussian Process (DGP) enables a deep probabilistic nonparametric approach to flexibly tackle complex machine learning problems with sound quantification of uncertainty. Existing inference approaches for DGP models have limited scalability and are notoriously cumbersome to construct. In this work, we introduce a novel formulation of DGPs based on random feature expansions that we train using stochastic variational inference. This yields a practical learning framework which significantly advances the state-of-the-art in inference for DGPs, and enables accurate quantification of uncertainty. We extensively showcase the scalability and performance of our proposal on several datasets with up to 8 million observations, and various DGP architectures with up to 30 hidden layers.

Modern retrieval systems are often driven by an underlying machine learning model. The goal of such systems is to identify and possibly rank the few most relevant items for a given query or context. Thus, such systems are typically evaluated using a ranking-based performance metric such as the area under the precision-recall curve, the $F_\beta$ score, precision at fixed recall, etc. Obviously, it is desirable to train such systems to optimize the metric of interest. In practice, due to the scalability limitations of existing approaches for optimizing such objectives, large-scale retrieval systems are instead trained to maximize classification accuracy, in the hope that performance as measured via the true objective will also be favorable. In this work we present a unified framework that, using straightforward building block bounds, allows for highly scalable optimization of a wide range of ranking-based objectives. We demonstrate the advantage of our approach on several real-life retrieval problems that are significantly larger than those considered in the literature, while achieving substantial improvement in performance over the accuracy-objective baseline.

To guide their behavior, humans and animals rely on previously learned knowledge about the world. Since the world is complex and models of the world are never perfect, the question arises whether we should trust our internal world model that we have built from past data or whether we should readjust it when we receive a new data sample. In noisy environments, a single data sample may not be reliable and in general we need to average over several data samples. However, when a structural change occurs in the environment, the most recent data samples are the most informative ones and we should put more weight on recent data samples than on earlier ones. Indeed, both humans and animals adaptively adjust the relative contribution of old and newly acquired data during learning (Behrens et al., 2007; Nassar et al., 2012; Krugel et al., 2009; Pearce and Hall, 1980) and rapidly adapt to changing environments (Pearce and Hall, 1980; Wilson et al., 1992; Holland, 1997).

Explosive growth in data and availability of cheap computing resources have sparked increasing interest in Big learning, an emerging subfield that studies scalable machine learning algorithms, systems, and applications with Big Data. Bayesian methods represent one important class of statistic methods for machine learning, with substantial recent developments on adaptive, flexible and scalable Bayesian learning. This article provides a survey of the recent advances in Big learning with Bayesian methods, termed Big Bayesian Learning, including nonparametric Bayesian methods for adaptively inferring model complexity, regularized Bayesian inference for improving the flexibility via posterior regularization, and scalable algorithms and systems based on stochastic subsampling and distributed computing for dealing with large-scale applications.

Collaborative security initiatives are increasingly often advocated to improve timeliness and effectiveness of threat mitigation. Among these, collaborative predictive blacklisting (CPB) aims to forecast attack sources based on alerts contributed by multiple organizations that might be targeted in similar ways. Alas, CPB proposals thus far have only focused on improving hit counts, but overlooked the impact of collaboration on false positives and false negatives. Moreover, sharing threat intelligence often prompts important privacy, confidentiality, and liability issues. In this paper, we first provide a comprehensive measurement analysis of two state-of-the-art CPB systems: one that uses a trusted central party to collect alerts [Soldo et al., Infocom'10] and a peer-to-peer one relying on controlled data sharing [Freudiger et al., DIMVA'15], studying the impact of collaboration on both correct and incorrect predictions. Then, we present a novel privacy-friendly approach that significantly improves over previous work, achieving a better balance of true and false positive rates, while minimizing information disclosure. Finally, we present an extension that allows our system to scale to very large numbers of organizations.

With proper management, Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand (AMoD) systems have great potential to satisfy the transport demands of urban populations by providing safe, convenient, and affordable ridesharing services. Meanwhile, such systems can substantially decrease private car ownership and use, and thus significantly reduce traffic congestion, energy consumption, and carbon emissions. To achieve this objective, an AMoD system requires private information about the demand from passengers. However, due to self-interestedness, passengers are unlikely to cooperate with the service providers in this regard. Therefore, an online mechanism is desirable if it incentivizes passengers to truthfully report their actual demand. For the purpose of promoting ridesharing, we hereby introduce a posted-price, integrated online ridesharing mechanism (IORS) that satisfies desirable properties such as ex-post incentive compatibility, individual rationality, and budget-balance. Numerical results indicate the competitiveness of IORS compared with two benchmarks, namely the optimal assignment and an offline, auction-based mechanism.

Domain adaptation addresses the problem created when training data is generated by a so-called source distribution, but test data is generated by a significantly different target distribution. In this work, we present approximate label matching (ALM), a new unsupervised domain adaptation technique that creates and leverages a rough labeling on the test samples, then uses these noisy labels to learn a transformation that aligns the source and target samples. We show that the transformation estimated by ALM has favorable properties compared to transformations estimated by other methods, which do not use any kind of target labeling. Our model is regularized by requiring that a classifier trained to discriminate source from transformed target samples cannot distinguish between the two. We experiment with ALM on simulated and real data, and show that it outperforms techniques commonly used in the field.

Pattern sampling has been proposed as a potential solution to the infamous pattern explosion. Instead of enumerating all patterns that satisfy the constraints, individual patterns are sampled proportional to a given quality measure. Several sampling algorithms have been proposed, but each of them has its limitations when it comes to 1) flexibility in terms of quality measures and constraints that can be used, and/or 2) guarantees with respect to sampling accuracy. We therefore present Flexics, the first flexible pattern sampler that supports a broad class of quality measures and constraints, while providing strong guarantees regarding sampling accuracy. To achieve this, we leverage the perspective on pattern mining as a constraint satisfaction problem and build upon the latest advances in sampling solutions in SAT as well as existing pattern mining algorithms. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm is applicable to a variety of pattern languages, which allows us to introduce and tackle the novel task of sampling sets of patterns. We introduce and empirically evaluate two variants of Flexics: 1) a generic variant that addresses the well-known itemset sampling task and the novel pattern set sampling task as well as a wide range of expressive constraints within these tasks, and 2) a specialized variant that exploits existing frequent itemset techniques to achieve substantial speed-ups. Experiments show that Flexics is both accurate and efficient, making it a useful tool for pattern-based data exploration.