We propose a novel energy function for Dense Associative Memory (DenseAM) networks, the log-sum-ReLU (LSR), inspired by optimal kernel density estimation. Unlike the common log-sum-exponential (LSE) function, LSR is based on the Epanechnikov kernel and enables exact memory retrieval with exponential capacity without requiring exponential separation functions. Moreover, it introduces abundant additional emergent local minima while preserving perfect pattern recovery -- a characteristic previously unseen in DenseAM literature. Empirical results show that LSR energy has significantly more local minima (memories) that have comparable log-likelihood to LSE-based models. Analysis of LSR's emergent memories on image datasets reveals a degree of creativity and novelty, hinting at this method's potential for both large-scale memory storage and generative tasks.

Current image fusion methods struggle with real-world composite degradations and lack the flexibility to accommodate user-specific needs. To address this, we propose ControlFusion, a controllable fusion network guided by language-vision prompts that adaptively mitigates composite degradations. On the one hand, we construct a degraded imaging model based on physical mechanisms, such as the Retinex theory and atmospheric scattering principle, to simulate composite degradations and provide a data foundation for addressing realistic degradations. On the other hand, we devise a prompt-modulated restoration and fusion network that dynamically enhances features according to degradation prompts, enabling adaptability to varying degradation levels. To support user-specific preferences in visual quality, a text encoder is incorporated to embed user-defined degradation types and levels as degradation prompts. Moreover, a spatial-frequency collaborative visual adapter is designed to autonomously perceive degradations from source images, thereby reducing complete reliance on user instructions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ControlFusion outperforms SOTA fusion methods in fusion quality and degradation handling, particularly under real-world and compound degradations.

It also discusses evaluation metrics and the use of explanations to debug models and improve performance.

Recent advancements in AI agents have demonstrated their growing potential to drive and support scientific discovery. In this work, we introduce MLR-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating AI agents on open-ended machine learning research. MLR-Bench includes three key components: (1) 201 research tasks sourced from NeurIPS, ICLR, and ICML workshops covering diverse ML topics; (2) MLR-Judge, an automated evaluation framework combining LLMbased reviewers with carefully designed review rubrics to assess research quality; and (3) MLR-Agent, a modular agent scaffold capable of completing research tasks through four stages: idea generation, proposal formulation, experimentation, and paper writing. Our framework supports both stepwise assessment across these distinct research stages, and end-to-end evaluation of the final research paper. We then use MLR-Bench to evaluate six frontier LLMs and an advanced coding agent, finding that while LLMs are effective at generating coherent ideas and well-structured papers, current coding agents frequently (e.g., in 80% of the cases) produce fabricated or invalidated experimental results--posing a major barrier to scientific reliability.

Profile-guided optimization (PGO) advances the frontiers of compiler optimization by leveraging dynamic runtime information to generate highly optimized binaries. Traditional instrumentation-based profiling collects accurate profile data but often suffers from heavy runtime overhead. In contrast, sampling-based profiling is more efficient and scalable when collecting profile data while avoiding intrusive source code modifications. However, accurately collecting execution profiles via sampling remains challenging, especially when applied to fully optimized binaries. Such inaccurate profile data can restrict the benefits of PGO. This paper presents PROFIX, a machine learning-guided approach based on hybrid GNN architecture that addresses the problem of profile inference, aiming to correct inaccuracies in the profiles collected by sampling. Experiments on the SPEC 2017 benchmarks demonstrate that PROFIX achieves up to a 9.15% performance improvement compared to the state-of-the-art traditional algorithm and an average 6.26% improvement over the baseline machine learning models.

Spatiotemporal trajectory data is crucial for various traffic-related applications. However, issues such as device malfunctions and network instability often result in sparse trajectories that lose detailed movement information compared to their dense counterparts. Recovering missing points in sparse trajectories is thus essential. Despite recent progress, three challenges remain. First, the lack of large-scale dense trajectory datasets hinders the training of a trajectory recovery model. Second, the varying spatiotemporal correlations in sparse trajectories make it hard to generalize across different sampling intervals.

The established redundancy in visual tokens within large vision-language models (LVLMs) allows for pruning to effectively reduce their substantial computational demands. Empirical evidence from previous works indicates that visual tokens in later decoder stages receive less attention than shallow layers. Then, previous methods typically employ heuristics layer-specific pruning strategies where, although the number of tokens removed may differ across decoder layers, the overall pruning schedule is fixed and applied uniformly to all input samples and tasks, failing to align token elimination with the model's holistic reasoning trajectory. Cognitive science indicates that human visual processing often begins with broad exploration to accumulate evidence before narrowing focus as the target becomes distinct. Our experiments reveal an analogous pattern in LVLMs.

Large language models are able to exploit in-context learning to access external knowledge beyond their training data through retrieval-augmentation. While promising, its inner workings remain unclear. In this work, we shed light on the mechanism of in-context retrieval augmentation for question answering by viewing a prompt as a composition of informational components. We propose an attributionbased method to identify specialized attention heads, revealing in-context heads that comprehend instructions and retrieve relevant contextual information, and parametric heads that store entities' relational knowledge. To better understand their roles, we extract function vectors and modify their attention weights to show how they can influence the answer generation process. Finally, we leverage the gained insights to trace the sources of knowledge used during inference, paving the way towards more safe and transparent language models.

Tabular data have been playing a vital role in diverse real-world fields, including healthcare, finance, etc. With the recent success of Large Language Models (LLMs), early explorations of extending LLMs to the domain of tabular data have been developed. Most of these LLM-based methods typically first serialize tabular data into natural language descriptions, and then tune LLMs or directly infer on these serialized data. However, these methods suffer from two key inherent issues: (i) data perspective: existing data serialization methods lack universal applicability for structured tabular data, and may pose privacy risks through direct textual exposure, and (ii) model perspective: LLM fine-tuning methods struggle with tabular data, and in-context learning scalability is bottle-necked by input length constraints (suitable for few-shot learning). This work explores a novel direction of integrating LLMs into tabular data through logical decision tree rules as intermediaries, proposing a decision tree enhancer with LLM-derived rule for tabular prediction, DeLTa. The proposed DeLTa avoids tabular data serialization, and can be applied to full data learning setting without LLM fine-tuning. Specifically, we leverage the reasoning ability of LLMs to redesign an improved rule given a set of decision tree rules. Furthermore, we provide a calibration method for original decision trees via new generated rule by LLM, which approximates the error correction vector to steer the original decision tree predictions in the direction of "errors" reducing. Finally, extensive experiments on diverse tabular benchmarks show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance.