Recent advances in reinforcement learning (RL) have demonstrated the powerful exploration capabilities and multimodality of generative diffusion-based policies. While substantial progress has been made in offline RL and off-policy RL settings, integrating diffusion policies into on-policy frameworks like PPO remains underexplored. This gap is particularly significant given the widespread use of large-scale parallel GPU-accelerated simulators, such as IsaacLab, which are optimized for on-policy RL algorithms and enable rapid training of complex robotic tasks. A key challenge lies in computing state-action log-likelihoods under diffusion policies, which is straightforward for Gaussian policies but intractable for flow-based models due to irreversible forward-reverse processes and discretization errors (e.g., EulerMaruyama approximations). To bridge this gap, we propose GenPO, a generative policy optimization framework that leverages exact diffusion inversion to construct invertible action mappings.

This position paper argues that human pose estimation (HPE) cannot be considered privacy-preserving or human-centric unless privacy is measured and evaluated. Although privacy concerns have become more visible in recent years, HPE systems are still assessed almost exclusively using accuracy metrics. Privacy is neither defined in measurable terms nor linked to regulatory requirements, and common deployment architectures introduce additional risks due to data transmission and storage. We highlight the limitations of current practices, including the continued reliance on RGB inputs and the lack of benchmarks that reflect legal and ethical constraints. We call for a shift in evaluation practices: privacy must become part of how HPE systems are designed, tested, and compared.

Large language models with Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures achieve efficiency and scalability, yet their routing mechanisms introduce safety alignment challenges insufficiently addressed by techniques developed for dense models. In this work, the MoE-specific safety risk of positional vulnerability--that safetyaligned behaviors rely on specific expert modules--is formalized and systematically analyzed. An analytical framework, SAFEX, is presented to robustly identify, characterize, and validate safety-critical experts via a stability-based expert selection procedure, and to decompose them into two functional groups: the Harmful Content Detection Group (HCDG), which specializes in identifying and recognizing harmful content within user inputs, and the Harmful Response Control Group (HRCG), which specializes in controlling and enforcing model behaviors to generate appropriate safety responses. Expert-level interventions are conducted to probe causality and to test mitigation. Targeted masking of SAFEX-selected experts reveals that safety behavior is highly concentrated. On Qwen3-30B-A3B, configured with 48 MoE-FFN layers and 128 experts per layer under top-8 routing (48 128 = 6,144 experts in total), disabling 12 selected experts reduces the refusal rate by 22%. In addition, lightweight adaptation is performed using LoRA under three configurations--the HRCG, the union of HCDG and HRCG, and all experts--and the resulting updates are composed through negative weight merging targeted at the HRCG, leading to improved refusal under adversarial prompts without full-model retraining. These results establish positional vulnerability as a distinct MoE-specific safety challenge and provide a practical, computeefficient pathway for expert-level safety interventions within routed architectures (https://github.com/Bearisbug/SAFEx).

We consider the problem of detecting a community of densely connected vertices in a high-dimensional bipartite graph of size n1 n2. Under the null hypothesis, the observed graph is drawn from a bipartite Erd os-Renyi distribution with connection probability p0. Under the alternative hypothesis, there exists an unknown bipartite subgraph of size k1 k2 in which edges appear with probability p1 = p0 +δfor some δ > 0, while all other edges outside the subgraph appear with probability p0. Specifically, we provide non-asymptotic upper and lower bounds on the smallest signal strength δ that is both necessary and sufficient to ensure the existence of a test with small enough Type I and Type II errors. We also derive novel minimax-optimal tests achieving these fundamental limits when the underlying graph is sufficiently dense. Our proposed tests involve a combination of hardthresholded nonlinear statistics of the adjacency matrix, the analysis of which may be of independent interest. In contrast with previous work, our non-asymptotic upper and lower bounds match for any configuration of n1,n2,k1,k2.

Multi-frame video enhancement tasks aim to improve the spatial and temporal resolution and quality of video sequences by leveraging temporal information from multiple frames, which are widely used in streaming video processing, surveillance, and generation. Although numerous Transformer-based enhancement methods have achieved impressive performance, their computational and memory demands hinder deployment on edge devices. Quantization offers a practical solution by reducing the bit-width of weights and activations to improve efficiency. However, directly applying existing quantization methods to video enhancement tasks often leads to significant performance degradation and loss of fine details. This stems from two limitations: (a) inability to allocate varying representational capacity across frames, which results in suboptimal dynamic range adaptation; (b) overreliance on full-precision teachers, which limits the learning of low-bit student models. To tackle these challenges, we propose a novel quantization method for video enhancement: Progressive Multi-Frame Quantization for Video Enhancement (PMQ-VE). This framework features a coarse-to-fine two-stage process: Backtracking-based Multi-Frame Quantization (BMFQ) and Progressive MultiTeacher Distillation (PMTD).

In real world, the observed label distribution of a dataset often mismatches its true distribution due to noisy labels. In this situation, noisy labels learning (NLL) methods directly integrated with long-tailed learning (LTL) methods tend to fail due to a dilemma: NLL methods normally rely on unbiased model predictions to recover true distribution by selecting and correcting noisy labels; while LTL methods like logit adjustment depends on true distributions to adjust biased predictions, leading to a deadlock of mutual dependency defined in this paper. To address this, we propose Unlocker, a bilevel optimization framework that integrates NLL methods and LTL methods to iteratively disentangle this deadlock. The inner optimization leverages NLL to train the model, incorporating LTL methods to fairly select and correct noisy labels. The outer optimization adaptively determines an adjustment strength, mitigating model bias from over-or under-adjustment. We also theoretically prove that this bilevel optimization problem is convergent by transferring the outer optimization target to an equivalent problem with a closed-form solution. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in alleviating model bias and handling long-tailed noisy label data. Code is available at https://github.com/ChenShu248/Unlocker.

Classical image filters, such as those for averaging or differencing, are carefully normalized to ensure consistency, interpretability, and to avoid artifacts like intensity shifts, halos, or ringing. In contrast, convolutional filters learned end-to-end in deep networks lack such constraints. Although they may resemble wavelets and blob/edge detectors, they are not normalized in the same or any way. Consequently, when images undergo atmospheric transfer, their responses become distorted, leading to incorrect outcomes. We address this limitation by proposing filter normalization, followed by learnable scaling and shifting, akin to batch normalization. This simple yet effective modification ensures that the filters are atmosphere-equivariant, enabling co-domain symmetry. By integrating classical filtering principles into deep learning (applicable to both convolutional neural networks and convolution-dependent vision transformers), our method achieves significant improvements on artificial and natural intensity variation benchmarks. Our ResNet34 could even outperform CLIP by a large margin. Our analysis reveals that unnormalized filters degrade performance, whereas filter normalization regularizes learning, promotes diversity, and improves robustness and generalization.

Image stitching synthesizes images captured from multiple perspectives into a single image with a broader field of view. The significant variations in object depth often lead to large parallax, resulting in ghosting and misalignment in the stitched results. To address this, we propose a depth-consistency-constrained seamless-free image stitching method. First, to tackle the multi-view alignment difficulties caused by parallax, a multi-stage mechanism combined with global depth regularization constraints is developed to enhance the alignment accuracy of the same apparent target across different depth ranges. Second, during the multi-view image fusion process, an optimal stitching seam is determined through graph-based low-cost computation, and a soft-seam region is diffused to precisely locate transition areas, thereby effectively mitigating alignment errors induced by parallax and achieving natural and seamless stitching results. Furthermore, considering the computational overhead in the shift regression process, a reparameterization strategy is incorporated to optimize the structural design, significantly improving algorithm efficiency while maintaining optimal performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method against the existing methods. Code is available at https://github.com/DLUT-YRH/DSFN.

Language model outputs are not always reliable, thus prompting research into how to adapt model responses based on uncertainty. Common approaches include: abstention, where models refrain from generating responses when uncertain; and linguistic calibration, where models hedge their statements using uncertainty quantifiers. However, abstention can withhold valuable information, while linguistically calibrated responses are often challenging to leverage in downstream tasks. We propose a unified view, Conformal Linguistic Calibration (CLC), which reinterprets linguistic calibration as answer set prediction. First we present a framework connecting abstention and linguistic calibration through the lens of linguistic pragmatics. We then describe an implementation of CLC that allows for controlling the level of imprecision in model responses. Results demonstrate our method produces calibrated outputs with conformal guarantees on factual accuracy. Further, our approach enables fine-tuning models to perform uncertainty-aware adaptive claim rewriting, offering a controllable balance between factuality and specificity.1

LRMs we By inno training directly vatively LRMs on fine-tune the to origina accurately the l reasoning model verify solely task the correctness the o reasoning verthinking.