Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Overview


Modeling Relational Logic Circuits for And-Inverter Graph Convolutional Network

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The automation of logic circuit design enhances chip performance, energy efficiency, and reliability, and is widely applied in the field of Electronic Design Automation (EDA).And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs) efficiently represent, optimize, and verify the functional characteristics of digital circuits, enhancing the efficiency of EDA development.Due to the complex structure and large scale of nodes in real-world AIGs, accurate modeling is challenging, leading to existing work lacking the ability to jointly model functional and structural characteristics, as well as insufficient dynamic information propagation capability.To address the aforementioned challenges, we propose AIGer.Specifically, AIGer consists of two components: 1) Node logic feature initialization embedding component and 2) AIGs feature learning network component.The node logic feature initialization embedding component projects logic nodes, such as AND and NOT, into independent semantic spaces, to enable effective node embedding for subsequent processing.Building upon this, the AIGs feature learning network component employs a heterogeneous graph convolutional network, designing dynamic relationship weight matrices and differentiated information aggregation approaches to better represent the original structure and information of AIGs.The combination of these two components enhances AIGer's ability to jointly model functional and structural characteristics and improves its message passing capability. Experimental results indicate that AIGer outperforms the current best models in the Signal Probability Prediction (SSP) task, improving MAE and MSE by 18.95\% and 44.44\%, respectively. In the Truth Table Distance Prediction (TTDP) task, AIGer achieves improvements of 33.57\% and 14.79\% in MAE and MSE, respectively, compared to the best-performing models.


A Survey on Video Anomaly Detection via Deep Learning: Human, Vehicle, and Environment

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Video Anomaly Detection (VAD) has emerged as a pivotal task in computer vision, with broad relevance across multiple fields. Recent advances in deep learning have driven significant progress in this area, yet the field remains fragmented across domains and learning paradigms. This survey offers a comprehensive perspective on VAD, systematically organizing the literature across various supervision levels, as well as adaptive learning methods such as online, active, and continual learning. We examine the state of VAD across three major application categories: human-centric, vehicle-centric, and environment-centric scenarios, each with distinct challenges and design considerations. In doing so, we identify fundamental contributions and limitations of current methodologies. By consolidating insights from subfields, we aim to provide the community with a structured foundation for advancing both theoretical understanding and real-world applicability of VAD systems. This survey aims to support researchers by providing a useful reference, while also drawing attention to the broader set of open challenges in anomaly detection, including both fundamental research questions and practical obstacles to real-world deployment.


about the paper like connecting the existing meta-learning frameworks with unsupervised/self-supervised feature

Neural Information Processing Systems

We thank the reviewers for the time and expertise they have invested in these reviews. How much does hand-crafted knowledge play a role in the performance of the proposed method? That seems like a more informative/reasonable baseline than training from scratch. For results, see table at supplemental material page 4. This overhead indeed exists during the meta-training time.





page allowed in the camera-ready version to: I) expand our literature review to include other related approaches; II)

Neural Information Processing Systems

We are very thankful to all reviewers for their time and valuable comments. We agree that "lots of works have used GCNN for different combinatorial optimization We agree that our benchmark is artificial, and using real-world instances would bring value. Such datasets could be collected, e.g. We intend to include those new results in the final version of the paper. We agree that we should discuss references [a-c] in our literature review.