Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Overview


Understanding Practitioners Perspectives on Monitoring Machine Learning Systems

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

--Given the inherent non-deterministic nature of machine learning (ML) systems, their behavior in production environments can lead to unforeseen and potentially dangerous outcomes. For a timely detection of unwanted behavior and to prevent organizations from financial and reputational damage, monitoring these systems is essential. This paper explores the strategies, challenges, and improvement opportunities for monitoring ML systems from the practitioners' perspective. We conducted a global survey of 91 ML practitioners to collect diverse insights into current monitoring practices for ML systems. We aim to complement existing research through our qualitative and quantitative analyses, focusing on prevalent runtime issues, industrial monitoring and mitigation practices, key challenges, and desired enhancements in future monitoring tools. Our findings reveal that practitioners frequently struggle with runtime issues related to declining model performance, exceeding latency, and security violations. While most prefer automated monitoring for its increased efficiency, many still rely on manual approaches due to the complexity or lack of appropriate automation solutions. Practitioners report that the initial setup and configuration of monitoring tools is often complicated and challenging, particularly when integrating with ML systems and setting alert thresholds. Moreover, practitioners find that monitoring adds extra workload, strains resources, and causes alert fatigue. The desired improvements from the practitioners' perspective are: automated generation and deployment of monitors, improved support for performance and fairness monitoring, and recommendations for resolving runtime issues. These insights offer valuable guidance for the future development of ML monitoring tools that are better aligned with practitioners' needs. Machine Learning (ML) systems are being increasingly employed across various domains, including social media, e-commerce, and engineering - even critical domains such as finance, healthcare, and autonomous vehicles nowadays leverage ML to automate and enhance their services. Generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) have further boosted ML adoption by creating several new use cases [1], [2]. A typical ML system lifecycle begins by gathering requirements and preparing data, which is followed by the development of the ML component (experimentation, model training, and evaluation) and other traditional software components [3]. After development, the next step is integration and system testing. Once quality assurance is completed, the ML system is deployed to a production environment.


Devstral: Fine-tuning Language Models for Coding Agent Applications

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We introduce Devstral-Small, a lightweight open source model for code agents with the best performance among models below 100B size. In this technical report, we give an overview of how we design and develop a model and craft specializations in agentic software development. The resulting model, Devstral-Small is a small 24B model, fast and easy to serve. Despite its size, Devstral-Small still attains competitive performance compared to models more than an order of magnitude larger.


InfiAgent: Self-Evolving Pyramid Agent Framework for Infinite Scenarios

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in organizing and executing complex tasks, and many such agents are now widely used in various application scenarios. However, developing these agents requires carefully designed workflows, carefully crafted prompts, and iterative tuning, which requires LLM techniques and domain-specific expertise. These handcrafted limitations hinder the scalability and cost-effectiveness of LLM agents across a wide range of industries. To address these challenges, we propose InfiA-gent, a Pyramid-like DAG-based Multi-Agent Framework that can be applied to infinite scenarios, which introduces several key innovations: a generalized "agent-as-a-tool" mechanism that automatically decomposes complex agents into hierarchical multi-agent systems; a dual-audit mechanism that ensures the quality and stability of task completion; an agent routing function that enables efficient task-agent matching; and an agent self-evolution mechanism that autonomously restructures the agent DAG based on new tasks, poor performance, or optimization opportunities. Furthermore, InfiAgent's atomic task design supports agent parallelism, significantly improving execution efficiency. Evaluations on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that InfiAgent achieves 9.9% higher performance compared to ADAS (similar auto-generated agent framework), while a case study of the AI research assistant InfiHelper shows that it generates scientific papers that have received recognition from human reviewers at top-tier IEEE conferences. The rapid development of large-scale language models (LLMs) has ushered in a new era of intelligent automation (Naveed et al., 2025; Tran et al., 2025), with agent-based systems demonstrating remarkable capabilities in organizing and executing complex tasks across domains. From scientific research and software development to creative content generation and business process automation, LLM agents are transforming how we solve problems at scale. However, the development and deployment of these agents face significant challenges, limiting their widespread adoption and effectiveness. Current approaches to building LLM agents rely heavily on carefully designed workflows, carefully crafted prompts, and extensive iterative tuning--processes that require deep LLM expertise and domain-specific knowledge (V eeramachaneni, 2025; Guo et al., 2024; Annam et al., 2025; Schick et al., 2023). This reliance on handcrafted solutions creates a fundamental scalability barrier: each new application requires significant manual intervention, making it difficult to rapidly deploy agents across diverse industries and use cases.


Adversarial Defense in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Review of GANs for Threat Detection and Mitigation

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Digital transformation of modern society has spread the attack surface of critical infrastructures, enterprise networks, and personal devices. Quick propagation of cyber threats, driven by sophisticated adversarial attacks including evasion[8, 82], data poisoning[21], and backdoor insertions[20, 21], weakened traditional security measures across domains including intrusion detection systems (IDS), Internet of Things (IoT) security, and autonomous networks [19, 82, 127, 138]. These attacks exploit machine learning vulnerabilities, vastly expanding attack surfaces amid the proliferation of IoT devices and distributed systems[35, 58, 59]. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), first introduced by Goodfellow et al.[1], have transitioned from synthetic data generation to essential defenses, enabling adversarial scenario simulation, dataset augmentation, and model resilience enhancement[16, 32, 33, 139]. Variants like Conditional GANs (CGANs) and Wasserstein GANs (WGANs) excel in producing realistic samples for anomaly detection and IDS robustness[27, 169, 170], outperforming static signature-based approaches against dynamic threats[60, 169, 173]. Yet, GAN applications in Cybersecurity are fragmented, grappling with training instability, dataset scarcity, edge-device computational constraints, and dual-use risks where GANs facilitate both defenses and advanced attacks[11, 13, 24, 34, 44, 61-63, 79, 80]. Recent advancements, such as GAN-IF models for intrusion detection and AR-GAN for autonomous vehicle defenses, underscore potential in real-time mitigation, but ethical frameworks and unified evaluations remain deficient[78, 81]. This gap necessitates a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate GAN architectures, applications, and performance metrics for proactive adversarial defense. 1


Object Detection with Multimodal Large Vision-Language Models: An In-depth Review

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The fusion of language and vision in large vision-language models (LVLMs) has revolutionized deep learning-based object detection by enhancing adaptability, contextual reasoning, and generalization beyond traditional architectures. This in-depth review presents a structured exploration of the state-of-the-art in LVLMs, systematically organized through a three-step research review process. First, we discuss the functioning of vision language models (VLMs) for object detection, describing how these models harness natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision (CV) techniques to revolutionize object detection and localization. We then explain the architectural innovations, training paradigms, and output flexibility of recent LVLMs for object detection, highlighting how they achieve advanced contextual understanding for object detection. The review thoroughly examines the approaches used in integration of visual and textual information, demonstrating the progress made in object detection using VLMs that facilitate more sophisticated object detection and localization strategies. This review presents comprehensive visualizations demonstrating LVLMs' effectiveness in diverse scenarios including localization and segmentation, and then compares their real-time performance, adaptability, and complexity to traditional deep learning systems. Based on the review, its is expected that LVLMs will soon meet or surpass the performance of conventional methods in object detection. The review also identifies a few major limitations of the current LVLM modes, proposes solutions to address those challenges, and presents a clear roadmap for the future advancement in this field. We conclude, based on this study, that the recent advancement in LVLMs have made and will continue to make a transformative impact on object detection and robotic applications in the future.


A Survey on Code Generation with LLM-based Agents

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Code generation agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the software development paradigm. Distinct from previous code generation techniques, code generation agents are characterized by three core features. 1) Autonomy: the ability to independently manage the entire workflow, from task decomposition to coding and debugging. 2) Expanded task scope: capabilities that extend beyond generating code snippets to encompass the full software development lifecycle (SDLC). 3) Enhancement of engineering practicality: a shift in research emphasis from algorithmic innovation toward practical engineering challenges, such as system reliability, process management, and tool integration. This domain has recently witnessed rapid development and an explosion in research, demonstrating significant application potential. This paper presents a systematic survey of the field of LLM-based code generation agents. We trace the technology's developmental trajectory from its inception and systematically categorize its core techniques, including both single-agent and multi-agent architectures. Furthermore, this survey details the applications of LLM-based agents across the full SDLC, summarizes mainstream evaluation benchmarks and metrics, and catalogs representative tools. Finally, by analyzing the primary challenges, we identify and propose several foundational, long-term research directions for the future work of the field.


Mind the Gap: A Review of Arabic Post-Training Datasets and Their Limitations

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Post-training has emerged as a crucial technique for aligning pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) with human instructions, significantly enhancing their performance across a wide range of tasks. Central to this process is the quality and diversity of post-training datasets. This paper presents a review of publicly available Arabic post-training datasets on the Hugging Face Hub, organized along four key dimensions: (1) LLM Capabilities (e.g., Question Answering, Translation, Reasoning, Summarization, Dialogue, Code Generation, and Function Calling); (2) Steerability (e.g., Persona and System Prompts); (3) Alignment (e.g., Cultural, Safety, Ethics, and Fairness); and (4) Robustness. Each dataset is rigorously evaluated based on popularity, practical adoption, recency and maintenance, documentation and annotation quality, licensing transparency, and scientific contribution. Our review revealed critical gaps in the development of Arabic post-training datasets, including limited task diversity, inconsistent or missing documentation and annotation, and low adoption across the community. Finally, the paper discusses the implications of these gaps on the progress of Arabic-centric LLMs and applications while providing concrete recommendations for future efforts in Arabic post-training dataset development.


LATTE: Latent Trajectory Embedding for Diffusion-Generated Image Detection

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The rapid advancement of diffusion-based image generators has made it increasingly difficult to distinguish generated from real images. This erodes trust in digital media, making it critical to develop generated image detectors that remain reliable across different generators. While recent approaches leverage diffusion denoising cues, they typically rely on single-step reconstruction errors and overlook the sequential nature of the denoising process. In this work, we propose LATTE - LATent Trajectory Embedding - a novel approach that models the evolution of latent embeddings across multiple denoising steps. Instead of treating each denoising step in isolation, LATTE captures the trajectory of these representations, revealing subtle and discriminative patterns that distinguish real from generated images. Experiments on several benchmarks, such as GenImage, Chameleon, and Diffusion Forensics, show that LATTE achieves superior performance, especially in challenging cross-generator and cross-dataset scenarios, highlighting the potential of latent trajectory modeling. The code is available on the following link: https://github.com/AnaMVasilcoiu/LATTE-Diffusion-Detector.


Scalable LLM Math Reasoning Acceleration with Low-rank Distillation

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

While many existing efficient inference methods have been developed with excellent performance preservation on language tasks, they often severely degrade math performance. In this paper, we propose Caprese, a resource-efficient distillation method to recover lost capabilities from deploying efficient inference methods, focused primarily in feedforward blocks. With original weights unperturbed, roughly 1% of additional parameters, and only 20K synthetic training samples, we are able to recover much if not all of the math capabilities lost from efficient inference for thinking LLMs and without harm to language tasks for instruct LLMs. Moreover, Caprese slashes the number of active parameters ( 2B cut for Gemma 2 9B and Llama 3.1 8B) and integrates cleanly into existing model layers to reduce latency (>16% time-to-next-token reduction) while encouraging response brevity (up to 8.5% fewer tokens).


Conflict-Based Search and Prioritized Planning for Multi-Agent Path Finding Among Movable Obstacles

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Abstract--This paper investigates Multi-Agent Path Finding Among Movable Obstacles (M-PAMO), which seeks collision-free paths for multiple agents from their start to goal locations among static and movable obstacles. M-PAMO arises in logistics and warehouses where mobile robots are among unexpected movable objects. Although Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) and single-agent Path planning Among Movable Obstacles (PAMO) were both studied, M-PAMO remains under-explored. Movable obstacles lead to new fundamental challenges as the state space, which includes both agents and movable obstacles, grows exponentially with respect to the number of agents and movable obstacles. This paper makes a first attempt to adapt and fuse the popular Conflict-Based Search (CBS) and Prioritized Planning (PP) for MAPF, and a recent single-agent PAMO planner called PAMO*, together to address M-PAMO. We compare their performance with up to 20 agents and hundreds of movable obstacles, and show the pros and cons of these approaches.