Explainable Recommendation refers to the personalized recommendation algorithms that address the problem of why -- they not only provide the user with the recommendations, but also make the user aware why such items are recommended by generating recommendation explanations, which help to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, persuasiveness, and user satisfaction of recommender systems. In recent years, a large number of explainable recommendation approaches -- especially model-based explainable recommendation algorithms -- have been proposed and adopted in real-world systems. In this survey, we review the work on explainable recommendation that has been published in or before the year of 2018. We first high-light the position of explainable recommendation in recommender system research by categorizing recommendation problems into the 5W, i.e., what, when, who, where, and why. We then conduct a comprehensive survey of explainable recommendation itself in terms of three aspects: 1) We provide a chronological research line of explanations in recommender systems, including the user study approaches in the early years, as well as the more recent model-based approaches. 2) We provide a taxonomy for explainable recommendation algorithms, including user-based, item-based, model-based, and post-model explanations. 3) We summarize the application of explainable recommendation in different recommendation tasks, including product recommendation, social recommendation, POI recommendation, etc. We devote a chapter to discuss the explanation perspectives in the broader IR and machine learning settings, as well as their relationship with explainable recommendation research. We end the survey by discussing potential future research directions to promote the explainable recommendation research area.

Machine learning – The ability for computers to improve functionality based on a variety of algorithms including pattern and text recognition. Over time, as it has more reference data, the machine learns to become more efficient. Natural-language processing – A process that deals with a computer's ability to analyze language through speech recognition, semantics and syntax. Just like a human learns a language through listening and reading while understanding the context, computers can attain a similar capability. Deep learning – A broader version of machine learning, deep learning is the ability for a computer to process various pieces of information the way a human would to make informed decisions and judgements.

Machine learning methods have gained a great deal of popularity in recent years among public administration scholars and practitioners. These techniques open the door to the analysis of text, image and other types of data that allow us to test foundational theories of public administration and to develop new theories. Despite the excitement surrounding machine learning methods, clarity regarding their proper use and potential pitfalls is lacking. This paper attempts to fill this gap in the literature through providing a machine learning "guide to practice" for public administration scholars and practitioners. Here, we take a foundational view of machine learning and describe how these methods can enrich public administration research and practice through their ability develop new measures, tap into new sources of data and conduct statistical inference and causal inference in a principled manner. We then turn our attention to the pitfalls of using these methods such as unvalidated measures and lack of interpretability. Finally, we demonstrate how machine learning techniques can help us learn about organizational reputation in federal agencies through an illustrated example using tweets from 13 executive federal agencies.

Extracting action sequences from natural language texts is challenging, as it requires commonsense inferences based on world knowledge. Although there has been work on extracting action scripts, instructions, navigation actions, etc., they require that either the set of candidate actions be provided in advance, or that action descriptions are restricted to a specific form, e.g., description templates. In this paper, we aim to extract action sequences from texts in free natural language, i.e., without any restricted templates, provided the candidate set of actions is unknown. We propose to extract action sequences from texts based on the deep reinforcement learning framework. Specifically, we view "selecting" or "eliminating" words from texts as "actions", and the texts associated with actions as "states". We then build Q-networks to learn the policy of extracting actions and extract plans from the labeled texts. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on several datasets with comparison to state-of-the-art approaches, including online experiments interacting with humans.

Coordinating agents to complete a set of tasks with intercoupled temporal and resource constraints is computationally challenging, yet human domain experts can solve these difficult scheduling problems using paradigms learned through years of apprenticeship. A process for manually codifying this domain knowledge within a computational framework is necessary to scale beyond the ``single-expert, single-trainee" apprenticeship model. However, human domain experts often have difficulty describing their decision-making processes, causing the codification of this knowledge to become laborious. We propose a new approach for capturing domain-expert heuristics through a pairwise ranking formulation. Our approach is model-free and does not require enumerating or iterating through a large state space. We empirically demonstrate that this approach accurately learns multifaceted heuristics on a synthetic data set incorporating job-shop scheduling and vehicle routing problems, as well as on two real-world data sets consisting of demonstrations of experts solving a weapon-to-target assignment problem and a hospital resource allocation problem. We also demonstrate that policies learned from human scheduling demonstration via apprenticeship learning can substantially improve the efficiency of a branch-and-bound search for an optimal schedule. We employ this human-machine collaborative optimization technique on a variant of the weapon-to-target assignment problem. We demonstrate that this technique generates solutions substantially superior to those produced by human domain experts at a rate up to 9.5 times faster than an optimization approach and can be applied to optimally solve problems twice as complex as those solved by a human demonstrator.

By the end of April 2018, blockchain-oriented projects have already collected a total of $6.1 billion year-to-date via initial coin offerings (ICOs), according to CoinSchedule data. This is a new record, as we saw $5.6 billion raised during the last year. Almost 60% of all the projects cover three markets -- communications, finance, and trading & investing -- with machine learning & AI getting only 2.7%. So we have an unexplored market here, with the artificial intelligence (AI) being so much ignored by the general public despite it being one of the revolutionary technologies along with blockchain. AI Crypto, an artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain-oriented company headquartered in Singapore, wants to combine both of the transformative technologies and bring a game-changing product to the market.

Region-based classification of PolSAR data can be effectively performed by seeking for the assignment that minimizes a distance between prototypes and segments. Silva et al (2013) used stochastic distances between complex multivariate Wishart models which, differently from other measures, are computationally tractable. In this work we assess the robustness of such approach with respect to errors in the training stage, and propose an extension that alleviates such problems. We introduce robustness in the process by incorporating a combination of radial basis kernel functions and stochastic distances with Support Vector Machines (SVM). We consider several stochastic distances between Wishart: Bhatacharyya, Kullback-Leibler, Chi-Square, R\'{e}nyi, and Hellinger. We perform two case studies with PolSAR images, both simulated and from actual sensors, and different classification scenarios to compare the performance of Minimum Distance and SVM classification frameworks. With this, we model the situation of imperfect training samples. We show that SVM with the proposed kernel functions achieves better performance with respect to Minimum Distance, at the expense of more computational resources and the need of parameter tuning. Code and data are provided for reproducibility.

We report a procedure that, in one step from continuous data with minimal preparation, recovers the graph found by Sachs et al. \cite{sachs2005causal}, with only a few edges different. The algorithm, Fast Adjacency Skewness (FASK), relies on a mixture of linear reasoning and reasoning from the skewness of variables; the Sachs data is a good candidate for this procedure since the skewness of the variables is quite pronounced. We review the ground truth model from Sachs et al. as well as some of the fluctuations seen in the protein abundances in the system, give the Sachs model and the FASK model, and perform a detailed comparison. Some variation in hyper-parameters is explored, though the main result uses values at or near the defaults learned from work modeling fMRI data.

A few weeks ago, I attempted to sit through Samsung's live-streamed Galaxy S9 smartphone launch event. I nearly fell asleep at my desk. Or the relocated fingerprint sensor, which is exactly what it sounds like. I realize this is a first-world problem, but in the 11 years since the release of the iPhone, advances in personal technology have gone from breakthrough to, well, pretty broke. What--and where--is the next revolutionary product, the thing that rewrites the rules and alters our lives forever?

Wall Street, venture capitalists, technology executives – all have important reasons to understand the growth and opportunity in the artificial intelligence market, but the inherent vagueness of the term makes any single valuation extremely difficult. Indeed, the term "artificial intelligence" is notorious for having a relatively amorphous definition. In order to put together an executive brief for market size and projected growth of AI, I've molded this article around (a) AI-related industry market research forecasts, and (b) a limited number of reputable research sources for further insight into AI valuation and forecasting, in addition to select and relevant quotes. Bear in mind that different market research firms define "artificial intelligence" according to varying criteria. To make this summary article more useful, we've quickly broken down all reports by source, definition / meaning of "artificial intelligence", valuation, and timeline.