Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is an emerging methodology that is transforming the way many complicated transportation decision-making problems are tackled. Researchers have been increasingly turning to this powerful learning-based methodology to solve challenging problems across transportation fields. While many promising applications have been reported in the literature, there remains a lack of comprehensive synthesis of the many DRL algorithms and their uses and adaptations. The objective of this paper is to fill this gap by conducting a comprehensive, synthesized review of DRL applications in transportation. We start by offering an overview of the DRL mathematical background, popular and promising DRL algorithms, and some highly effective DRL extensions. Building on this overview, a systematic investigation of about 150 DRL studies that have appeared in the transportation literature, divided into seven different categories, is performed. Building on this review, we continue to examine the applicability, strengths, shortcomings, and common and application-specific issues of DRL techniques with regard to their applications in transportation. In the end, we recommend directions for future research and present available resources for actually implementing DRL.

We consider a pursuit-evasion game [11] played between two agents, 'Blue' (the pursuer) and 'Red' (the evader), over $T$ time steps. Red aims to attack Blue's territory. Blue's objective is to intercept Red by time $T$ and thereby limit the success of Red's attack. Blue must plan its pursuit trajectory by choosing parameters that determine its course of movement (speed and angle in our setup) such that it intercepts Red by time $T$. We show that Blue's path-planning problem in pursuing Red, can be posed as a sequential decision making problem under uncertainty. Blue's unawareness of Red's action policy renders the analytic dynamic programming approach intractable for finding the optimal action policy for Blue. In this work, we are interested in exploring data-driven approaches to the policy optimization problem that Blue faces. We apply generative machine learning (ML) approaches to learn optimal action policies for Blue. This highlights the ability of generative ML model to learn the relevant implicit representations for the dynamics of simulated pursuit-evasion games. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our modeling approach via extensive statistical assessments. This work can be viewed as a preliminary step towards further adoption of generative modeling approaches for addressing policy optimization problems that arise in the context of multi-agent learning and planning [1].

In this meetup, we will learn how AI, in particular, Reinforcement Learning learns to play games. We will provide an overview of Monte Carlo methods, including prediction & control. Then see how we can use this to play the game of Black Jack with no user input. Have your Laptops ready as this meetup is hands-on.

In this meetup, we will learn how AI, in particular, Reinforcement Learning learns to play games. We will provide an overview of Monte Carlo methods, including prediction and control. Then see how we can use this to play the game of Black Jack with no user input. Have your Laptops ready as this meetup is hands-on.

Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) is commonly based on medical observations and assessment of clinical signs, including the characterization of a variety of motor symptoms. However, traditional diagnostic approaches may suffer from subjectivity as they rely on the evaluation of movements that are sometimes subtle to human eyes and therefore difficult to classify, leading to possible misclassification. In the meantime, early non-motor symptoms of PD may be mild and can be caused by many other conditions. Therefore, these symptoms are often overlooked, making diagnosis of PD at an early stage challenging. To address these difficulties and to refine the diagnosis and assessment procedures of PD, machine learning methods have been implemented for the classification of PD and healthy controls or patients with similar clinical presentations (e.g., movement disorders or other Parkinsonian syndromes). To provide a comprehensive overview of data modalities and machine learning methods that have been used in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PD, in this study, we conducted a systematic literature review of studies published until February 14, 2020, using the PubMed and IEEE Xplore databases. A total of 209 studies were included, extracted for relevant information and presented in this systematic review, with an investigation of their aims, sources of data, types of data, machine learning methods and associated outcomes. These studies demonstrate a high potential for adaptation of machine learning methods and novel biomarkers in clinical decision making, leading to increasingly systematic, informed diagnosis of PD.

This paper investigates the use of nonparametric kernel-regression to obtain a tasksimilarity aware meta-learning algorithm. Our hypothesis is that the use of tasksimilarity helps meta-learning when the available tasks are limited and may contain outlier/ dissimilar tasks. While existing meta-learning approaches implicitly assume the tasks as being similar, it is generally unclear how this task-similarity could be quantified and used in the learning. As a result, most popular metalearning approaches do not actively use the similarity/dissimilarity between the tasks, but rely on availability of huge number of tasks for their working. Our contribution is a novel framework for meta-learning that explicitly uses task-similarity in the form of kernels and an associated meta-learning algorithm. We model the task-specific parameters to belong to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space where the kernel function captures the similarity across tasks. The proposed algorithm iteratively learns a meta-parameter which is used to assign a task-specific descriptor for every task. The task descriptors are then used to quantify the task-similarity through the kernel function. We show how our approach conceptually generalizes the popular meta-learning approaches of model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) and Meta-stochastic gradient descent (Meta-SGD) approaches. Numerical experiments with regression tasks show that our algorithm outperforms these approaches when the number of tasks is limited, even in the presence of outlier or dissimilar tasks. This supports our hypothesis that task-similarity helps improve the metalearning performance in task-limited and adverse settings.

This article provides an introduction to forecasting insurance claims payouts. We focus specifically on the claims arising from weather events (events) that result in large scale destruction such as hurricanes, wildfires, floods, etc. We first provide a general overview of the traditional methodology and then discuss potential use of machine learning (ML) techniques to enhance the forecasting process. While the examples and website references provided in this article are US-centric, the ideas presented herein are general and can be applied to all locations. In other regions and countries, the analyst will need to substitute the appropriate data sources for event data.

Clustering is a fundamental task in unsupervised learning, one that targets to group a dataset into clusters of similar objects. There has been recent interest in embedding normative considerations around fairness within clustering formulations. In this paper, we propose 'local connectivity' as a crucial factor in assessing membership desert in centroid clustering. We use local connectivity to refer to the support offered by the local neighborhood of an object towards supporting its membership to the cluster in question. We motivate the need to consider local connectivity of objects in cluster assignment, and provide ways to quantify local connectivity in a given clustering. We then exploit concepts from density-based clustering and devise LOFKM, a clustering method that seeks to deepen local connectivity in clustering outputs, while staying within the framework of centroid clustering. Through an empirical evaluation over real-world datasets, we illustrate that LOFKM achieves notable improvements in local connectivity at reasonable costs to clustering quality, illustrating the effectiveness of the method.

Authentication is the task of confirming the matching relationship between a data instance and a given identity. Typical examples of authentication problems include face recognition and person re-identification. Data-driven authentication could be affected by undesired biases, i.e., the models are often trained in one domain (e.g., for people wearing spring outfits) while applied in other domains (e.g., they change the clothes to summer outfits). Previous works have made efforts to eliminate domain-difference. They typically assume domain annotations are provided, and all the domains share classes. However, for authentication, there could be a large number of domains shared by different identities/classes, and it is impossible to annotate these domains exhaustively. It could make domain-difference challenging to model and eliminate. In this paper, we propose a domain-agnostic method that eliminates domain-difference without domain labels. We alternately perform latent domain discovery and domain-difference elimination until our model no longer detects domain-difference. In our approach, the latent domains are discovered by learning the heterogeneous predictive relationships between inputs and outputs. Then domain-difference is eliminated in both class-dependent and class-independent components. Comprehensive empirical evaluation results are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed method.

As progress in AI continues to advance at a rapid pace, it is crucial to know how advanced systems will make choices and in what ways they may fail. Machines can already outsmart humans in some domains, and understanding how to safely build systems which may have capabilities at or above the human level is of particular concern. One might suspect that superhumanly-intelligent systems should be modeled as as something which humans, by definition, can't outsmart. However, as a challenge to this assumption, this paper presents the Achilles Heel hypothesis which states that highly-effective goal-oriented systems -- even ones that are potentially superintelligent -- may nonetheless have stable decision theoretic delusions which cause them to make obviously irrational decisions in adversarial settings. In a survey of relevant dilemmas and paradoxes from the decision theory literature, a number of these potential Achilles Heels are discussed in context of this hypothesis. Several novel contributions are made involving the ways in which these weaknesses could be implanted into a system.