We propose a paradigm for modeling speech production based on neural networks. We focus on characteristics of the musculoskeletal system. Using real physiological data - articulator movements and EMG from muscle activitya neural network learns the forward dynamics relating motor commands to muscles and the ensuing articulator behavior. After learning, simulated perturbations, were used to asses properties of the acquired model, such as natural frequency, damping, and interarticulator couplings. Finally, a cascade neural network is used to generate continuous motor commands from a sequence of discrete articulatory targets.

We have previously described an unsupervised learning procedure that discovers spatially coherent propertit _; of the world by maximizing the information that parameters extracted from different parts of the sensory input convey about some common underlying cause. When given random dot stereograms of curved surfaces, this procedure learns to extract surface depth because that is the property that is coherent across space. It also learns how to interpolate the depth at one location from the depths at nearby locations (Becker and Hint.oll.

This paper considers the problem of expressing predicate calculus in connectionist networks that are based on energy minimization. Given a firstorder-logic knowledge base and a bound k, a symmetric network is constructed (like a Boltzman machine or a Hopfield network) that searches for a proof for a given query. If a resolution-based proof of length no longer than k exists, then the global minima of the energy function that is associated with the network represent such proofs. The network that is generated is of size cubic in the bound k and linear in the knowledge size. There are no restrictions on the type of logic formulas that can be represented.

Neurons encoding simple visual features in area VI such as orientation, direction of motion and color are organized in retinotopic maps. However, recent physiological experiments have shown that the responses of many neurons in VI and other cortical areas are modulated by the direction of gaze. We have developed a neural network model of the visual cortex to explore the hypothesis that visual features are encoded in headcentered coordinates at early stages of visual processing. New experiments are suggested for testing this hypothesis using electrical stimulations and psychophysical observations.

Visual object recognition involves the identification of images of 3-D objects seen from arbitrary viewpoints. We suggest an approach to object recognition in which a view is represented as a collection of points given by their location in the image. An object is modeled by a set of 2-D views together with the correspondence between the views. We show that any novel view of the object can be expressed as a linear combination of the stored views. Consequently, we build a linear operator that distinguishes between views of a specific object and views of other objects.

Recently, high resolution images of the simultaneous representation of orientation preference, orientation selectivity and ocular dominance have been obtained for large areas in monkey striate cortex by optical imaging [1-3]. These data allow for the first time a "local" as well as "global" description of the spatial patterns and provide strong evidence for correlations between orientation selectivity and ocular dominance. A quantitative analysis reveals that these correlations arise when a fivedimensional feature space (two dimensions for retinotopic space, one each for orientation preference, orientation specificity, and ocular dominance) is mapped into the two available dimensions of cortex while locally preserving topology. These results provide strong evidence for the concept of topology preserving maps which have been suggested as a basic design principle of striate cortex [4-7]. Monkey striate cortex contains a retinotopic map in which are embedded the highly repetitive patterns of orientation selectivity and ocular dominance. The retinotopic projection establishes a "global" order, while maps of variables describing other stimulus features, in particular line orientation and ocularity, dominate cortical organization locally. A large number of pattern models [8-12] as well as models of development [6,7,13-21] have been proposed to describe the spatial structure of these patterns and their development during ontogenesis. However, most models have not been compared with experimental data in detail. There are two reasons for this: (i) many model-studies were not elaborated enough to be experimentally testable and (ii) a sufficient amount of experimental data obtained from large areas of striate cortex was not available.

It is shown that both changes in viewing position and illumination conditions can be compensated for, prior to recognition, using combinations of images taken from different viewing positions and different illumination conditions. It is also shown that, in agreement with psychophysical findings, the computation requires at least a sign-bit image as input - contours alone are not sufficient. 1 Introduction The task of visual recognition is natural and effortless for biological systems, yet the problem of recognition has been proven to be very difficult to analyze from a computational point of view. The fundamental reason is that novel images of familiar objects are often not sufficiently similar to previously seen images of that object. Assuming a rigid and isolated object in the scene, there are two major sources for this variability: geometric and photometric. The geometric source of variability comes from changes of view position. A 3D object can be viewed from a variety of directions, each resulting with a different 2D projection. The difference is significant, even for modest changes in viewing positions, and can be demonstrated by superimposing those projections (see Figure 1, first row second image). Much attention has been given to this problem in the visual recognition literature ([9], and references therein), and recent results show that one can compensate for changes in viewing position by generating novel views from a small number of model views of the object [10, 4, 8].

Automated monitoring of vigilance in attention intensive tasks such as air traffic control or sonar operation is highly desirable. As the operator monitors the instrument, the instrument would monitor the operator, insuring against lapses. We have taken a first step toward this goal by using feedforward neural networks trained with backpropagation to interpret event related potentials (ERPs) and electroencephalogram (EEG) associated with periods of high and low vigilance. The accuracy of our system on an ERP data set averaged over 28 minutes was 96%, better than the 83% accuracy obtained using linear discriminant analysis. Practical vigilance monitoring will require prediction over shorter time periods. We were able to average the ERP over as little as 2 minutes and still get 90% correct prediction of a vigilance measure. Additionally, we achieved similarly good performance using segments of EEG power spectrum as short as 56 sec.

Such systems attempt to combine the best features of both models: the temporal structure of HMMs and the discriminative power of neural networks. In this work we define a time-warping (1W) neuron that extends the operation of the fonnal neuron of a back-propagation network by warping the input pattern to match it optimally to its weights. We show that a single-layer network of TW neurons is equivalent to a Gaussian density HMMbased recognition system.

The Bayesian model comparison framework is reviewed, and the Bayesian Occam's razor is explained. This framework can be applied to feedforward networks, making possible (1) objective comparisons between solutions using alternative network architectures; (2) objective choice of magnitude and type of weight decay terms; (3) quantified estimates of the error bars on network parameters and on network output. The framework also generates a measure of the effective number of parameters determined by the data. The relationship of Bayesian model comparison to recent work on prediction of generalisation ability (Guyon et al., 1992, Moody, 1992) is discussed.