Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Country


Extended Goals for Composing Services

AAAI Conferences

The ability to automatically compose Web Services is critical for realisingย  more complex functionalities.ย  Several proposals to use automated planning to deal with the problem of service composition have been recently made. We present an approach, based on modelling the problem as a CSP (Constraintย  Satisfaction Problem), that accommodates for the use of numeric variables, sensing and incomplete knowledge. We introduce a language for expressing extended goals, equipped with temporal constructs, maintainability properties, and an explicit distinction between sensing and achievement goals, in order to avoid undesirable situations.


Path-Adaptive A* for Incremental Heuristic Search in Unknown Terrain

AAAI Conferences

Adaptive A* is an incremental version of A* that updates the h-values of the previous A* search to make them more informed and thus future A* searches more focused. In this paper, we show how the A* searches performed by Adaptive A* can reuse part of the path of the previous search and terminate before they expand a goal state, resulting in Path-Adaptive A*. We demonstrate experimentally that Path-Adaptive A* expands fewer states per search and runs faster than Adaptive A* when solving path-planning problems in initially unknown terrain.


h m ( P ) = h 1 ( P m ): Alternative Characterisations of the Generalisation From h max To h m

AAAI Conferences

The h m ( m = 1 ... ) family of admissible heuristics for STRIPS planning with additive costs generalise the h max heuristic, which results when m = 1. We show that the step from h 1 to h m can be made by changing the planning problem instead of the heuristic function. This furthers our understanding of the h m heuristic, and may inspire application of the same generalisation to admissible heuristics stronger than h max . As an example, we show how it applies to the additive variant of h m obtained via cost splitting.


An Automatically Configurable Portfolio-based Planner with Macro-actions: PbP

AAAI Conferences

The field of automated plan generation has recently significantly advanced. However, while several powerful domainindependent PbP has two variants: PbP.s focusing on speed, and planners have been developed, no one of these PbP.q focusing on plan quality. PbP.s entered the learning clearly outperforms all the others in every known benchmark track of the sixth international planning competition (IPC6), domain. It would then be useful to have a multi-planner system and was the overall winner of this competition track (Fern, that automatically selects and combines the most efficient Khardon and Tadepalli 2008). The paper includes some experimental planner(s) for each given domain.


Computing Robust Plans in Continuous Domains

AAAI Conferences

We define the robustness of a sequential plan as the probability that it will execute successfully despite uncertainty in the execution environment. We consider a rich notion of uncertainty over continuous domains that includes stochastic action effects, and changes to state variables due to unpredictable exogenous events. Given a characterization of this uncertainty in terms of probability distributions (e.g., Gaussian) our contributions are two-fold: First, we describe a novel approach to computing the robustness of a plan in the situation calculus, which (a) separates the projection problem from the problem of reasoning about probability, and (b) explicitly reveals the relevance and statistical independence of random variables and events (i.e., conditions that contain random variables). Then, building on this approach, we describe a forward search based planner that generates maximally robust plans, exploiting the revealed structure for speed-up. Preliminary empirical results demonstrate that our approach can realize exponential savings in both time and space compared to the classical sampling approach.


Multi-Goal Planning for an Autonomous Blasthole Drill

AAAI Conferences

This paper presents multi-goal planning for an autonomous blasthole drill used in open pit mining operations. Given a blasthole pattern to be drilled and constraints on the vehicle's motion and orientation when drilling, we wish to compute the best order in which to drill the given pattern. Blasthole pattern drilling is an asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem with precedence constraints specifying that some holes must be drilled before others. We wish to find the minimum cost tour according to criteria that minimize the distance travelled satisfying the precedence and vehicle motion constraints. We present an iterative method for solving the blasthole sequencing problem using the combination of a Genetic Algorithm and motion planning simulations that we use to determine the true cost of travel between any two holes.


Acquisition of Object-Centred Domain Models from Planning Examples

AAAI Conferences

The problem of formulating knowledge bases containing action schema is a central concern in knowledge engineering for AI Planning. This paper describes LOCM, a system which carries out the automated induction of action schema from sets of example plans.ย  Each plan is assumed to be a sound sequence of actions; each action in a plan is stated as a name and a list of objects that the action refers to. LOCM exploits the assumption that actions change the state of objects, and require objects to be in a certain state before they can be executed.ย  The novelty of LOCM is that it can induce action schema without being provided with any information about predicates or initial, goal or intermediate state descriptions for the example action sequences.ย  In this paper we describe the implemented LOCM algorithm, and analyse its performance by its application to the induction of domain models for several domains. To evaluate the algorithm, we used random action sequences from existing models of domains, as well as solutions to past IPC problems.


Ant Search Strategies For Planning Optimization

AAAI Conferences

In this paper a planning framework based on Ant Colony Optimization techniques is presented. It is well known that finding optimal solutions to planning problems is a very hard computational problem. Stochastic methods do not guarantee either optimality or completeness, but it has been proved that in many applications they are able to find very good, often optimal, solutions. We propose several approaches based both on backward and forward search over the state space, using several heuristics and testing different pheromone models in order to solve sequential optimization planning problems.


Integrating Planning and Scheduling in a CP Framework: A Transition-Based Approach

AAAI Conferences

Many potential real-world planning applications are on the border of planning and scheduling. To handle the complex choices of actions and temporal and resource constraints of these problems we need to integrate planning and scheduling techniques. Here we propose a transition-based formulation of temporal planning problems, that enables us to represent features like deadlines, time windows, release times etc. in a simple way. We describe a CSP encoding of the transition-based formulation and its potential advantages in integrating planning and scheduling techniques.


Multi-Agent Online Planning with Communication

AAAI Conferences

We propose an online algorithm for planning under uncertainty in multi-agent settings modeled as DEC-POMDPs. The algorithm helps overcome the high computational complexity of solving such problems off-line. The key challenge is to produce coordinated behavior using little or no communication. When communication is allowed but constrained, the challenge is to produce high value with minimal communication. The algorithm addresses these challenges by communicating only when history inconsistency is detected, allowing communication to be postponed if necessary. Moreover, it bounds the memory usage at each step and can be applied to problems with arbitrary horizons. The experimental results confirm that the algorithm can solve problems that are too large for the best existing off-line planning algorithms and it outperforms the best online method, producing higher value with much less communication in most cases.