Heuristics used for solving hard real-time search problems have regions with depressions. Such regions are bounded areas of the search space in which the heuristic function is exceedingly low compared to the actual cost to reach a solution. Real-time search algorithms easily become trapped in those regions since the heuristic values of states in them may need to be updated multiple times, which results in costly solutions. State-of-the-art real-time search algorithms like LSS-LRTA*, LRTA*(k), etc., improve LRTA*'s mechanism to update the heuristic, resulting in improved performance. Those algorithms, however, do not guide search towards avoiding or escaping depressed regions. This paper presents depression avoidance, a simple real-time search principle to guide search towards avoiding states that have been marked as part of a heuristic depression. We apply the principle to LSS-LRTA* producing aLSS-LRTA*, a new real-time search algorithm whose search is guided towards exiting regions with heuristic depressions. We show our algorithm outperforms LSS-LRTA* in standard real-time benchmarks. In addition we prove aLSS-LRTA* has most of the good theoretical properties of LSS-LRTA*.

This paper proposes the integration of the resolution rule for Max-SAT with unsatisfiability-based Max-SAT solvers. First, we show that the resolution rule for Max-SAT can be safely applied as dictated by the resolution proof associated with an unsatisfiable core when such proof is read-once, that is, each clause is used at most once in the resolution process. Second, we study how this property can be integrated in an unsatisfiability-based solver. In particular, the resolution rule for Max-SAT is applied to read-once proofs or to read-once subparts of a general proof. Finally, we perform an empirical investigation on structured instances from recent Max-SAT evaluations. Preliminary results show that the use of read-once resolution substantially improves the performance of the solver.

The minimization problem for propositional formulas is an important optimization problem in the second level of the polynomial hierarchy. In general, the problem is Sigma-2-complete under Turing reductions, but restricted versions are tractable. We study the complexity of minimization for formulas in two established frameworks for restricted propositional logic: The Post framework allowing arbitrarily nested formulas over a set of Boolean connectors, and the constraint setting, allowing generalizations of CNF formulas. In the Post case, we obtain a dichotomy result: Minimization is solvable in polynomial time or coNP-hard. This result also applies to Boolean circuits. For CNF formulas, we obtain new minimization algorithms for a large class of formulas, and give strong evidence that we have covered all polynomial-time cases.

We address a dynamic decision problem in which decision makers must pay some costs when they change their decisions along the way. We formalize this problem as Dynamic SAT (DynSAT) with decision change costs, whose goal is to find a sequence of models that minimize the aggregation of the costs for changing variables. We provide two solutions to solve a specific case of this problem. The first uses a Weighted Partial MaxSAT solver after we encode the entire problem as a WeightedPartial MaxSAT problem. The second solution, which we believe is novel, uses the Lagrangian decomposition technique that divides the entire problem into sub-problems, each of which can be separately solved by an exact Weighted Partial MaxSATsolver, and produces both lower and upper bounds on the optimal in an anytime manner. To compare the performance of these solvers, we experimentedon the random problem and the target trackingproblem. The experimental results show that a solver based on Lagrangian decomposition performs better for the random problem and competitively for the target tracking problem.

ADOPT and BnB-ADOPT are two optimal DCOP search algorithms that are similar except for their search strategies: the former uses best-first search and the latter uses depth-first branch-and-bound search. In this paper, we present a new algorithm, called ADOPT( k ), that generalizes them. Its behavior depends on the k parameter. It behaves like ADOPT when k = 1, like BnB-ADOPT when k = ∞ and like a hybrid of ADOPT and BnB-ADOPT when 1 < k < ∞. We prove that ADOPT( k ) is a correct and complete algorithm and experimentally show that ADOPT( k ) outperforms ADOPT and BnB-ADOPT on several benchmarks across several metrics.

Bessiere et al. (AAAI'08) showed that several intractable global constraints can be efficiently propagated when certain natural problem parameters are small. In particular, the complete propagation of a global constraint is fixed-parameter tractable in k — the number of holes in domains — whenever bound consistency can be enforced in polynomial time; this applies to the global constraints AtMost-NValue and Extended Global Cardinality (EGC). In this paper we extend this line of research and introduce the concept of reduction to a problem kernel, a key concept of parameterized complexity, to the field of global constraints. In particular, we show that the consistency problem for AtMost-NValue constraints admits a linear time reduction to an equivalent instance on O(k 2 ) variables and domain values. This small kernel can be used to speed up the complete propagation of NValue constraints. We contrast this result by showing that the consistency problem for EGC constraints does not admit a reduction to a polynomial problem kernel unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses.

Transposition tables are a powerful tool in search domains for avoiding duplicate effort and for guiding node expansions. Traditionally, however, they have only been applicable when the current state is exactly the same as a previously explored state. We consider a generalized transposition table, whereby a similarity metric that exploits local structure is used to compare the current state with a neighbourhood of previously seen states. We illustrate this concept and forward pruning based on function approximation in the domain of Skat, and show that we can achieve speedups of 16+ over standard methods.

This problem involves imprecise probability judgements, widening the scope of application areas. In fact, there is a In this paper, we study algorithms for probabilistic large number of potential application areas for PSAT, from satisfiability (PSAT), an NPcomplete problem, machine learning to the modelling of biological processes, and their empiric complexity distribution. We define from hardware and software verification to economics and a PSAT normal form, based on which we propose econometrics. However, there are very few, if any, practical two logic-based algorithms: a reduction of algorithms available, used in limited applications.

We examine the complexity of constraint satisfaction problems that consist of a set of AllDiff constraints. Such CSPs naturally model a wide range of real-world and combinatorial problems, like scheduling, frequency allocations and graph coloring problems. As this problem is known to be NP-complete, we investigate under which further assumptions it becomes tractable. We observe that a crucial property seems to be the convexity of the variable domains and constraints. Our main contribution is an extensive study of the complexity of Multiple AllDiff CSPs for a set of natural parameters, like maximum domain size and maximum size of the constraint scopes. We show that, depending on the parameter, convexity can make the problem tractable while it is provably intractable in general.

Such problems are that each relation R can be defined by a Boolean combination frequently intractable, but there are several important of equations over the signature,, andc, which are set CSPs that are known to be polynomial-time function symbols for intersection, union, and complementation, tractable. We introduce a large class of set CSPs respectively. Details of the formal definition and many that can be solved in quadratic time. Our class, examples of set constraint languages can be found in Section which we call EI, contains all previously known 3. The choice of N is just for notational convenience; tractable set CSPs, but also some new ones that as we will see, we could have selected any infinite set for are of crucial importance for example in description our purposes. In the following, a set constraint satisfaction logics. The class of EI set constraints has an problem (set CSP) is a problem of the form CSP(Γ) for a elegant universal-algebraic characterization, which set constraint language Γ. It has been shown by Marriott and we use to show that every set constraint language Odersky [Marriott and Odersky, 1996] that all set CSPs are that properly contains all EI set constraints already contained in NP; they also showed that the largest set constraint has a finite sublanguage with an NPhard constraint language, which consists of all relations that can be satisfaction problem.