Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Country


Multi-Agent Coordination: DCOPs and Beyond

AAAI Conferences

Distributed constraint optimization problems (DCOPs) are a model for representing multi-agent systems in which agents cooperate to optimize a global objective. The DCOP model has two main advantages: it can represent a wide range of problem domains, and it supports the development of generic algorithms to solve them. Firstly, this paper presents some advances in both complete and approximate DCOP algorithms. Secondly, it explains that the DCOP model makes a number of unrealistic assumptions that severely limit its range of application. Finally, it points out hints on how to tackle such limitations.


Human Behavior Analysis from Video Data Using Bag-of-Gestures

AAAI Conferences

Human Behavior Analysis in Uncontrolled Environmentscan be categorized in two main challenges:1) Feature extraction and 2) Behavior analysisfrom a set of corporal language vocabulary. Inthis work, we present our achievements characterizingsome simple behaviors from visual data ondifferent real applications and discuss our plan forfuture work: low level vocabulary definition frombag-of-gesture units and high level modelling andinference of human behaviors.


Temporal Defeasible Argumentation in Multi-Agent Planning

AAAI Conferences

In this paper, I present my ongoing research on temporal defeasible argumentation-based multi-agent planning. In multi-agent planning a team of agents share a set of goals but have diverse abilities and temporal beliefs, which vary over time. In order to plan for these goals, agents start a stepwise dialogue consisting of exchanges of temporal plan proposals, plus temporal arguments against them, where both, actions with different duration, and temporal defeasible arguments, need to be integrated. This thesis proposes a computational framework for this research on multi-agent planning.


Research Proposal: Cooperation among Self Interested Agents

AAAI Conferences

Unfortunately, this example is a useful analogy can be treated within a unified framework along for many situations in real life, where (individually) rational with seemingly unrelated problems in the fields of judgment behavior leads to a disaster for the society.


RDFKB: A Semantic Web Knowledge Base

AAAI Conferences

There are many significant research projects focused on providing semantic web repositories that are scalable and efficient. However, the true value of the semantic web architecture is its ability to represent meaningful knowledge and not just data. Therefore, a semantic web knowledge base should do more than retrieve collections of triples. We propose RDFKB (Resource Description Knowledge Base), a complete semantic web knowledge case. RDFKB is a solution for managing, persisting and querying semantic web knowledge. Our experiments with real world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that RDFKB achieves superior query performance to other state-of-the-art solutions. The key features of RDFKB that differentiate it from other solutions are: 1) a simple and efficient process for data additions, deletions and updates that does not involve reprocessing the dataset; 2) materialization of inferred triples at addition time without performance degradation; 3) materialization of uncertain information and support for queries involving probabilities; 4) distributed inference across datasets; 5) ability to apply alignments to the dataset and perform queries against multiple sources using alignment. RDFKB allows more knowledge to be stored and retrieved; it is a repository not just for RDF datasets, but also for inferred triples, probability information, and lineage information. RDFKB provides a complete and efficient RDF data repository and knowledge base.


Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Social Choice and Manipulation

AAAI Conferences

My research seeks insight into the complexity of computationalreasoning under uncertain information. I focus onpreference aggregation and social choice. Insights in theseareas have broader impacts in the areas of complexity theory, autonomous agents, and uncertainty in artificial intelligence.


Contributions to Personalizable Knowledge Integration

AAAI Conferences

Researchers Inconsistency and partial information is the norm both in AI and databases, as well as in information retrieval, in knowledge bases used in many real world applications have been working on the problems that arise with the integration that support, among other things, human of heterogeneous knowledge bases for decades [Baral et decision making processes. In this work we argue al., 1991; Benferhat et al., 1997; Besnard and Schaub, 1998; that the management of this kind of data needs to be Arenas et al., 1999; Bohannon et al., 2005]. However, almost context-sensitive, creating a synergy with the user all past approaches proceeded under the assumption that to build useful, flexible data management systems.


On Temporal Regulations and Commitment Protocols

AAAI Conferences

Temporal regulations are needed to express commitments The proposal of Elisa Marengo's thesis is to extend to achieve something and in a specified order. For commitment protocols in order to (i) allow for expressing instance, an insurance company commits to paying an innetwork commitments to temporal regulations, and surgeon for a procedure only after a covered patient (ii) to supply a tool for expressing laws, conventions has undergone the procedure. Patterns of interaction, instead, and the like, in order to specify legal interactions.


An Analysis of Multiobjective Search Algorithms and Heuristics

AAAI Conferences

However, little is known regarding which algorithm is heuristic graph search algorithms. The analysis better in practice or the actual benefits of heuristic information is focused on the influence of heuristic information, in multiobjective search performance.


Talking about Trust in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems

AAAI Conferences

In heterogeneous multi-agent systems trust is necessary to improve interactions by enabling agents to choose good partners. Most trust models work by taking, in addition to direct experiences, other agents' communicated evaluations into account. However, in an open MAS other agents may use different trust models and the evaluations they communicate are based on different principles: as such they are meaningless without some form of alignment. My doctoral research gives a formal definition of this problem and proposes two methods of achieving an alignment.