Country
Towards Measuring Sharedness of Team Mental Models by Compositional Means
Jonker, Catholijn M. (Delft University of Technology) | Riemsdijk, Birna van (Delft University of Technology) | Kieft, Iris C. van de (Delft University of Technology) | Gini, Maria (Delft University of Technology, and University of Minnesota)
The better the team mental model, the better the teamwork. An important aspect of what determines a good team model is the extent to which the model is shared by the team members. This paper presents suggestions for measuring the extent to which teams have a shared mental model and describes how these measures are related to team performance. The most promising measures of sharedness proposed so far rely on using a compositional approach for team modeling and on a situation-sensitive relevance relation that indicates to what extent components contribute to team performance. A case study illustrates the approach and initial results on measuring performance when teams use different levels of sharedness.
Awareness in Mixed Initiative Planning
Gianni, Mario (Sapienza University of Rome) | Papadakis, Panagiotis (Sapienza University of Rome) | Pirri, Fiora (Sapienza University of Rome) | Pizzoli, Matia (Sapienza University of Rome)
For tasks that need to be accomplished in unconstrained environments, as in the case of Urban Search and Rescue (USAR), human-robot collaboration is considered as an indispensable component. Collaboration is based on accurate models of robot and human perception consistent with one another, so that exchange of information critical to the accomplishment of a task is performed efficiently and in a simplified fashion to minimize the interaction overhead. In this paper, we highlight the features of a human-robot team, i.e. how robot perception may be combined with human perception based on a task-driven direction for USAR. We elaborate on the design of the components of a mixed-initiative system wherein a task assigned to the robot is planned and executed jointly with the human operator as a result of their interaction. Our description is solidified by demonstrating the application of mixed-initiative planning in a number of examples related to the morphological adaptation of the rescue robot.
A Graph Theory Approach for Generating Multiple Choice Exams
Luger, Sarah K. K. (The University of Edinburgh)
It is costly and time consuming to develop Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) by hand. Using web-based resources to automate components of MCQ development would greatly benefit the education community through reducing reduplication of effort. Similar to many areas of Natural Language Processing (NLP), human-judged data is needed to train automated systems, but the majority of such data is proprietary. We present a graph-based representation for gathering training data from existing, web-based resources that increases access to such data and better directs the development of good questions.
Planning and Realizing Questions in Situated Human-Robot Interaction
Kruijff-Korbayova, Ivana (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI))
This paper is about generating questions in human-robot interaction. We survey existing work on the forms and meanings of questions in English and discuss the pragmatic effects resulting from an interplay between the choice of syntactic form and intonation. We propose an approach to formalization based on a notion of common ground and commitment, set in a model of situated dialogue as part of collaborative activity where we explicitly model the beliefs and intentions of both the robot and the human. Questions come about by abductively inferring an intentional structure grounded in the belief model and indicating commitments. Content planning and surface realization turn this into a question of the appropriate form.
Curiosity and the Development of Question Generation Skills
Jirout, Jamie J. (Carnegie Mellon University)
The current study investigates the relationship between children’s curiosity and question asking ability. Generation of two types of questions was assessed: identification (yes/no questions asked to identify a target from an array) and understanding questions, asked to learn more about a topic. The latter was related to children’s curiosity, as was the ability to recognize the effectiveness of questions in solving a mystery. Training on asking identification questions was effective in improving children’s ability to ask that type of question, but did not transfer to the other task. Training on asking understanding questions was not successful. Children’s curiosity did not influence the effectiveness of the training.
How to Generate Cloze Questions from Definitions: A Syntactic Approach
Gates, Donna Marie (Carnegie Mellon University)
This paper discusses the implementation and evaluation of automatically generated cloze questions in the style of the definitions found in Collins COBUILD English language learner’s dictionary. The definitions and the cloze questions are used in an automated reading tutor to help second and third grade students learn new vocabulary. A parser provides syntactic phrase structure trees for the definitions. With these parse trees as input, a pattern matching program uses a set of syntactic patterns to extract the phrases that make up the cloze question answers and distracters.
Using Automatic Question Generation to Evaluate Questions Generated by Children
Chen, Wei (Carnegie Mellon University) | Mostow, Jack (Carnegie Mellon University) | Aist, Gregory (Iowa State University)
This paper shows that automatically generated questions can help classify children’s spoken responses to a reading tutor teaching them to generate their own questions. We use automatic question generation to model and classify children’s prompted spoken questions about stories. On distinguishing complete and incomplete questions from irrelevant speech and silence, a language model built from automatically generated questions out-performs a trigram language model that does not exploit the structure of questions.
A Simulation of Evolving Sustainable Technology Through Social Pressure
Rush, Daniel E. (University of Michigan)
In this paper we develop a model to simulate the evolution of a pollution-free resource gathering technology that is initially less efficient but ultimately reaches parity with polluting technology. We find that for low levels of pollution, pressure exerted by society can indeed encourage the development and use of non-polluting technology, with greater pressure being associated with faster achievement of efficiency parity and lower overall pollution. However, greater pressure is also associated with lower populations and at the highest levels of pressure there are significant risks of population crashes. We find that these results hold for both localized pollution and globalized pollution, with globalized pollution encouraging faster achievement of efficiency parity. For high levels of pollution we find that introducing societal pressure significantly increases the occurrence of population crashes, and thus the strategy is only effective under certain conditions.
Energy Constraints and Behavioral Complexity: The Case of a Robot with a Living Core
Montebelli, Alberto (University of Skövde) | Lowe, Robert ( University of Skövde ) | Ziemke, Tom ( University of Skövde )
The new scenarios of contemporary adaptive robotics seem to suggest a transformation of the traditional methods. In the search for new approaches to the control of adaptive autonomous systems, the mind becomes a fundamental source of inspiration. In this paper we anticipate, through the use of simulation, the cognitive and behavioral properties that emerge from a recent prototype robotic platform, EcoBot, a family of bio-mechatronic symbionts provided with an `artificial metabolism', that has been under physical development during recent years. Its energy reliance on a biological component and the consequent limitation of its supplied energy determine a special kind of dynamic coupling between the robot and its environment. Rather than just an obstacle, energetic constraints become the opportunity for the development of a rich set of behavioral and cognitive properties.
In Defense of the Neo-Piagetian Approach to Modeling and Engineering Human-Level Cognitive Systems
Licato, John (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) | Bringsjord, Selmer (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
Presumably any human-level cognitive system (HLCS) must have the capacity to: maintain and learn new concepts; believe propositions about its environment that are constructed from these concepts, and from what it perceives; reason over the propositions it believes, in order to among other things manipulate its environment and justify its significant decisions; and learn new concepts. Given this list of desiderata, it’s hard to see how any intelligent attempt to build or simulate a HLCS can avoid falling under a neo-Piagetian approach to engineering HLCSs. Unfortunately, such engineering has been discursively declared by Jerry Fodor to be flat-out impossible. After setting out Fodor’s challenges, we refute them and, inspired by those refutations, sketch our solutions on behalf of those wanting to computationally model and construct HLCSs, under neo-Piagetian assumptions.