The RW-LS planner Arvand-LS is described Most successful current satisficing planners combine several next, followed by a section about the generation and selection complementary search algorithms. Examples range from of harder problems from existing IPC domains for portfolio planners such as Fast Downward Stone Soup which scalable problem generators are available. The experimental (Helmert, Röger, and Karpas 2011) and loosely coupled parallel results for Arvand-LS show strong improvements planners such as ArvandHerd (Valenzano et al. 2011) to over the state of the art in both coverage and plan quality for systems which alternate several search strategies, such as FF hard problems from several IPC domains. The paper concludes (Hoffmann and Nebel 2001), FD (Helmert 2006), and ArvandHerd, with a discussion of possible future work, including and dual queue search algorithms as in LAMA perspectives for a portfolio system containing Arvand-LS. (Richter and Westphal 2010).

Portfolio planners and parameter tuning are two ideas that have recently attracted significant attention in the domain-independent planning community. We combine these two ideas and present a portfolio planner that runs automatically configured planners. We let the automatic parameter tuning framework ParamILS find fast configurations of the Fast Downward planning system for a number of planning domains. Afterwards we learn a portfolio of those planner configurations. Evaluation of our portfolio planner on the IPC 2011 domains shows that it has a significantly higher IPC score than the winner of the sequential satisficing track.

Recent research leverages results from the continuous-armed bandit literature to create a reinforcement-learning algorithm for continuous state and action spaces. Initially proposed in a theoretical setting, we provide the first examination of the empirical properties of the algorithm. Through experimentation, we demonstrate the effectiveness of this planning method when coupled with exploration and model learning and show that, in addition to its formal guarantees, the approach is very competitive with other continuous-action reinforcement learners.

Human users who execute an automatically generated plan want to understand the rationale behind it. Knowledge-rich plans are particularly suitable for this purpose, because they provide the means to give reason for causal, temporal, and hierarchical relationships between actions. Based on this information, focused arguments can be generated that constitute explanations on an appropriate level of abstraction. In this paper, we present a formal approach to plan explanation. Information about plans is represented as first-order logic formulae and explanations are constructed as proofs in the resulting axiomatic system. With that, plan explanations are provably correct w.r.t. the planning system that produced the plan. A prototype plan explanation system implements our approach and first experiments give evidence that finding plan explanations is feasible in real-time.

This work describes an approach that automatically extracts standard metadata information from e-learning contents, combines it with the student preferences/goals and creates PDDL planning domains+problems.These PDDL problems can be solved by current planners, although we motivate the use and benefits of case-based planning techniques, to obtain fully tailored learning routes that significantly enhance the learning process. During the execution of a given route, a monitoring phase is used to detect discrepancies, i.e. flaws that prevent the student from continuing with the original plan. In such a situation, an adaptation mechanism becomes necessary to fix the flaws, while also trying to minimise the differences between the original and the new route. We have integrated this approach on top of Moodle and experimented with 100 benchmark problems to evaluate the quality, scalability and viability of the system.

This paper presents a decision-theoretic planning approach for probabilistic environments where the agent's goal is to win, which we model as maximizing the probability of being above a given reward threshold. In competitive domains, second is as good as last, and it is often desirable to take risks if one is in danger of losing, even if the risk does not pay off very often. Our algorithm maximizes the probability of being above a particular reward threshold by dynamically switching between a suite of policies, each of which encodes a different level of risk. This method does not explicitly encode time or reward into the state space, and decides when to switch between policies during each execution step. We compare a risk-neutral policy to switching among different risk-sensitive policies, and show that our approach improves the agent's probability of winning.

This paper provides an analysis of the efficacy of a known iterative improvement meta-heuristic approach from the AI area in solving the Blocking Job Shop Scheduling Problem (BJSSP) class of problems. The BJSSP is known to have significant fallouts on practical domains, and differs from the classical Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) in that it assumes that there are no intermediate buffers for storing a job as it moves from one machine to another; according to the BJSSP definition, each job has to wait on a machine until it can be processed on the next machine. In our analysis, two specific variants of the iterative improvement meta-heuristic are evaluated: (1) an adaptation of an existing scheduling algorithm based on the Iterative Flattening Search and (2) an off-the-shelf optimization tool, the IBM ILOG CP Optimizer, which implements Self-Adapting Large Neighborhood Search. Both are applied to a reference benchmark problem set and comparative performance results are presented. The results confirm the effectiveness of the iterative improvement approach in solving the BJSSP; both variants perform well individually and together succeed in improving the entire set of benchmark instances.

We present the domain-independent HRFF algorithm, which solves goal-oriented HMDPs by incrementally aggregating plans generated by the METRIC-FF planner into a policy defined over discrete and continuous state variables. HRFF takes into account non-monotonic state variables, and complex combinations of many discrete and continuous probability distributions. We introduce new data structures and algorithmic paradigms to deal with continuous state spaces: hybrid hierarchical hash tables, domain determinization based on dynamic domain sampling or on static computation of probability distributions' modes, optimization settings under METRIC-FF based on plan probability and length. We deeply analyze the behavior of HRFF on a probabilistically-interesting structured navigation problem with continuous dead-ends and non-monotonic continuous state variables. We compare with HAO* on the Rover domain and show that HRFF outperforms HAO* by many order of magnitudes in terms of computation time and memory usage. We also experiment challenging and combinatorial HMDP versions of benchmarks from numeric classical planning.

The paper illustrates a novel approach to conformant planning using classical planners. The approach relies on two core ideas developed to deal with incomplete information in the initial situation: the use of a classical planner to solve non-classical planning problems, and the reduction of the size of the initial belief state. Differently from previous uses of classical planners to solve non-classical planning problems, the approach proposed in this paper creates a valid plan from a possible plan---by inserting actions into the possible plan and maintaining only one level of non-deterministic choice (i.e., the initial plan being modified). The algorithm can be instantiated with different classical planners---the paper presents the GC[LAMA] implementation, whose classical planner is LAMA. We investigate properties of the approach, including conditions for completeness. GC[LAMA] is empirically evaluated against state-of-the-art conformant planners, using benchmarks from the literature. The experimental results show that GC[LAMA] is superior to other planners, in both performance and scalability. GC[LAMA] is the only planner that can solve the largest instances from several domains. The paper investigates the reasons behind the good performance and the challenges encountered in GC[LAMA].

There has been much interest recently in problems that com-bine high-level task planning with low-level motion planning.In this paper, we present a problem of this kind that arises inmulti-vehicle mission planning. It tightly integrates task al-location and scheduling, who will do what when, with pathplanning, how each task will actually be performed. It ex-tends classical vehicle routing in that the cost of executing aset of high-level tasks can vary significantly in time and costaccording to the low-level paths selected. It extends classi-cal motion planning in that each path must minimize costwhile also respecting temporal constraints, including thoseimposed by the agent’s other tasks and the tasks assigned toother agents. Furthermore, the problem is a subtask withinan interactive system and therefore must operate within se-vere time constraints. We present an approach to the problembased on a combination of tabu search, linear programming,and heuristic search. We evaluate our planner on represen-tative problem instances and find that its performance meetsthe demanding requirements of our application. These resultsdemonstrate how integrating multiple diverse techniques cansuccessfully solve challenging real-world planning problemsthat are beyond the reach of any single method.