Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has achieved great success in various applications. However, recent studies show that machine learning models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. DRL models have been attacked by adding perturbations to observations. While such observation based attack is only one aspect of potential attacks on DRL, other forms of attacks which are more practical require further analysis, such as manipulating environment dynamics. Therefore, we propose to understand the vulnerabilities of DRL from various perspectives and provide a thorough taxonomy of potential attacks. We conduct the first set of experiments on the unexplored parts within the taxonomy. In addition to current observation based attacks against DRL, we propose the first targeted attacks based on action space and environment dynamics. We also introduce the online sequential attacks based on temporal consistency information among frames. To better estimate gradient in black-box setting, we propose a sampling strategy and theoretically prove its efficiency and estimation error bound. We conduct extensive experiments to compare the effectiveness of different attacks with several baselines in various environments, including game playing, robotics control, and autonomous driving.

We consider a problem of ecological inference, in which individual-level covariates are known, but labeled data is available only at the aggregate level. The intended application is modeling voter preferences in elections. In Rosenman and Viswanathan (2018), we proposed modeling individual voter probabilities via a logistic regression, and posing the problem as a maximum likelihood estimation for the parameter vector beta. The likelihood is a Poisson binomial, the distribution of the sum of independent but not identically distributed Bernoulli variables, though we approximate it with a heteroscedastic Gaussian for computational efficiency. Here, we extend the prior work by proving results about the existence of the MLE and the curvature of this likelihood, which is not log-concave in general. We further demonstrate the utility of our method on a real data example. Using data on voters in Morris County, NJ, we demonstrate that our approach outperforms other ecological inference methods in predicting a related, but known outcome: whether an individual votes.

Graph convolutional networks(GCNs) have become the most popular approaches for graph data in these days because of their powerful ability to extract features from graph. GCNs approaches are divided into two categories, spectral-based and spatial-based. As the earliest convolutional networks for graph data, spectral-based GCNs have achieved impressive results in many graph related analytics tasks. However, spectral-based models cannot directly work on directed graphs. In this paper, we propose an improved spectral-based GCN for the directed graph by leveraging redefined Laplacians to improve its propagation model. Our approach can work directly on directed graph data in semi-supervised nodes classification tasks. Experiments on a number of directed graph datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.

Modelling statistical relationships beyond the conditional mean is crucial in many settings. Conditional density estimation (CDE) aims to learn the full conditional probability density from data. Though highly expressive, neural network based CDE models can suffer from severe over-fitting when trained with the maximum likelihood objective. Due to the inherent structure of such models, classical regularization approaches in the parameter space are rendered ineffective. To address this issue, we develop a model-agnostic noise regularization method for CDE that adds random perturbations to the data during training. We demonstrate that the proposed approach corresponds to a smoothness regularization and prove its asymptotic consistency. In our experiments, noise regularization significantly and consistently outperforms other regularization methods across seven data sets and three CDE models. The effectiveness of noise regularization makes neural network based CDE the preferable method over previous non- and semi-parametric approaches, even when training data is scarce.

The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is the number of infants per 1000 that do not survive until their first birthday. It is an important metric providing information about infant health but it also measures the society's general health status. Despite the high level of prosperity in the U.S.A., the country's IMR is higher than that of many other developed countries. Additionally, the U.S.A. exhibits persistent inequalities in the IMR across different racial and ethnic groups. In this paper, we study the infant mortality prediction using features extracted from birth certificates. We are interested in training classification models to decide whether an infant will survive or not. We focus on exploring and understanding the importance of features in subsets of the population; we compare models trained for individual races to general models. Our evaluation shows that our methodology outperforms standard classification methods used by epidemiology researchers.

The physics informed neural network (PINN) is evolving as a viable method to solve partial differential equations. In the recent past PINNs have been successfully tested and validated to find solutions to both linear and non-linear partial differential equations (PDEs). However, the literature lacks detailed investigation of PINNs in terms of their representation capability. In this work, we first test the original PINN method in terms of its capability to represent a complicated function. Further, to address the shortcomings of the PINN architecture, we propose a novel distributed PINN, named DPINN. We first perform a direct comparison of the proposed DPINN approach against PINN to solve a non-linear PDE (Burgers' equation). We show that DPINN not only yields a more accurate solution to the Burgers' equation, but it is found to be more data-efficient as well. At last, we employ our novel DPINN to two-dimensional steady-state Navier-Stokes equation, which is a system of non-linear PDEs. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first such attempt to directly solve the Navier-Stokes equation using a physics informed neural network.

Bayesian optimization (BO) has been broadly applied to computational expensive problems, but it is still challenging to extend BO to high dimensions. Existing works are usually under strict assumption of an additive or a linear embedding structure for objective functions. This paper directly introduces a supervised dimension reduction method, Sliced Inverse Regression (SIR), to high dimensional Bayesian optimization, which could effectively learn the intrinsic sub-structure of objective function during the optimization. Furthermore, a kernel trick is developed to reduce computational complexity and learn nonlinear subset of the unknowing function when applying SIR to extremely high dimensional BO. We present several computational benefits and derive theoretical regret bounds of our algorithm. Extensive experiments on synthetic examples and two real applications demonstrate the superiority of our algorithms for high dimensional Bayesian optimization.

Regularization in the optimization of deep neural networks is often critical to avoid undesirable over-fitting leading to better generalization of model. One of the most popular regularization algorithms is to impose L-2 penalty on the model parameters resulting in the decay of parameters, called weight-decay, and the decay rate is generally constant to all the model parameters in the course of optimization. In contrast to the previous approach based on the constant rate of weight-decay, we propose to consider the residual that measures dissimilarity between the current state of model and observations in the determination of the weight-decay for each parameter in an adaptive way, called adaptive weight-decay (AdaDecay) where the gradient norms are normalized within each layer and the degree of regularization for each parameter is determined in proportional to the magnitude of its gradient using the sigmoid function. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of AdaDecay in comparison to the state-of-the-art optimization algorithms using popular benchmark datasets: MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10 with conventional neural network models ranging from shallow to deep. The quantitative evaluation of our proposed algorithm indicates that AdaDecay improves generalization leading to better accuracy across all the datasets and models.

Contemporary debates on filter bubbles and polarization in public and social media raise the question to what extent news media of the past exhibited biases. This paper specifically examines bias related to gender in six Dutch national newspapers between 1950 and 1990. We measure bias related to gender by comparing local changes in word embedding models trained on newspapers with divergent ideological backgrounds. We demonstrate clear differences in gender bias and changes within and between newspapers over time. In relation to themes such as sexuality and leisure, we see the bias moving toward women, whereas, generally, the bias shifts in the direction of men, despite growing female employment number and feminist movements. Even though Dutch society became less stratified ideologically (depillarization), we found an increasing divergence in gender bias between religious and social-democratic on the one hand and liberal newspapers on the other. Methodologically, this paper illustrates how word embeddings can be used to examine historical language change. Future work will investigate how fine-tuning deep contextualized embedding models, such as ELMO, might be used for similar tasks with greater contextual information.

We introduce a semantics for epistemic logic exploiting a belief base abstraction. Differently from existing Kripke-style semantics for epistemic logic in which the notions of possible world and epistemic alternative are primitive, in the proposed semantics they are non-primitive but are defined from the concept of belief base. We show that this semantics allows us to define the universal epistemic model in a simpler and more compact way than existing inductive constructions of it. We provide (i) a number of semantic equivalence results for both the basic epistemic language with "individual belief" operators and its extension by the notion of "only believing", and (ii) a lower bound complexity result for epistemic logic model checking relative to the universal epistemic model.