The starting point is an ongoing effort to structure underlying intelligent behavior, whether intended reconstruct cognitive architectures from the ground up via as models of human intelligence and/or implementations of graphical models (Koller and Friedman 2009), with the artificial intelligence (Langley, Laird and Rogers 2009). A aim of understanding existing architectures better, basic cognitive architecture may comprise memories, exploring the overall space of architectures, and decision algorithms, learning mechanisms, and some developing new and improved architectures (Rosenbloom means of interacting with external environments.

Since the expert systems movement of the 1980s and 1990s, - Joint inference between expert knowledge and general AI has had the dream of reproducing expert behavior in specialized Commonsense background knowledge; domains of knowledge, such as medicine or engineering, - Efficient inference, both forward and backward, of plausible by collecting knowledge from human experts. But assertions. the first generations of expert systems suffered from two problems -- first, the difficulty of knowledge engineering

Informational conflicts in operational policies cause agents to run into situations where responding based on the rules in one policy violates the same or another policy. Static checking of these conflicts is infeasible and impractical in a dynamic environment. This paper discusses a practical approach to handling policy conflicts in real-time domains within the context of a hierarchical military command and control simulated system that consists of a central command, squad leaders and squad members. All the entities in the domain function according to preset communication and action protocols in order to perform successful missions. Each entity in the domain is equipped with an instance of a metacognitive component to provide on-board/on-time analysis of actions and recommendations during the operation of the system. The metacognitive component is the Metacognitive Loop (MCL) which is a general purpose anomaly processor designed to function as a cross-domain plugin system. It continuously monitors expectations and notices when they are violated, assesses the cause of the violation and guides the host system to an appropriate response. MCL makes use of three ontologies—indications, failures and responses—to perform the notice, assess and guide phases when a conflict occurs. Conflicts in the set of rules (within a policy or between policies) manifest as expectation violations in the real world. These expectation violations trigger nodes in the indication ontology which, in turn, activate associated nodes in the failure ontology. The responding failure nodes then activate the appropriate nodes in the response ontology. Depending on which response node gets activated, the actual response may vary from ignoring the conflict to prioritizing, modifying or deleting one or more conflicting rules.

The impressive results of the 2007 DARPA Urban Challenge showed that fully autonomous vehicles are technologically feasible with current intelligent vehicle hardware. It is natural to ask how current transportation infrastructure can be improved when most vehicles are driven autonomously in the future. Dresner and Stone proposed a new intersection control mechanism called Autonomous Intersection Management (AIM) and showed in simulation that intersection control can be made more efficient than the traditional control mechanisms such as traffic signals and stop signs. In this paper, we extend the study by examining the relationship between the precision of cars' motion controllers and the efficiency of the intersection controller. We propose a planning-based motion controller that can reduce the chance that autonomous vehicles stop before intersections, and show that this controller can increase the efficiency of the intersection control mechanism.

In Real-Time Strategy (RTS) video games, players (controlled by humans or computers) build structures and recruit armies, fight for space and resources in order to control strategic points, destroy the opposing force and ultimately win the game. Players need to predict where and how the opponents will strike in order to best defend themselves. Conversely, assessing how the opponents will defend themselves is crucial to mounting a successful attack while exploiting the vulnerabilities in the opponent's defence strategy. In this context, to be truly adaptable, computer-controlled players need to recognize their opponents' behaviour, their goals, and their plans to achieve those goals. In this paper we analyze the algorithmic challenges behind behaviour recognition in RTS games and discuss a generic RTS behaviour recognition system that we are developing to address those challenges. The application domain is that of RTS games, but many of the key points we discuss also apply to other video game genres such as multiplayer first person shooter (FPS) games.

Collaborative filtering systems have been developed to manage information overload and improve discourse in online communities. In such systems, users rank content provided by other users on the validity or usefulness within their particular context. The goal is that "good" content will rise to prominence and "bad" content will fade into obscurity. These filtering mechanisms are not well-understood and have known weaknesses. For example, they depend on the presence of a large crowd to rate content, but such a crowd may not be present. Additionally, the community's decisions determine which voices will reach a large audience and which will be silenced, but it is not known if these decisions represent "the wisdom of crowds" or a "censoring mob." Our approach uses statistical machine learning to predict community ratings. By extracting features that replicate the community's verdict, we can better understand collaborative filtering, improve the way the community uses the ratings of their members, and design agents that augment community decision-making. Slashdot is an example of such a community where peers will rate each others' comments based on their relevance to the post. This work extracts a wide variety of features from the Slashdot metadata and posts' linguistic contents to identify features that can predict the community rating. We find that author reputation, use of pronouns, and author sentiment are salient. We achieve 76% accuracy predicting community ratings as good, neutral, or bad.

Wikis allow for collaborators to collect information about entities. In turn, such entity information can be used for AI tasks, such as information extraction. However, these collaborators are almost exclusively human users. Allowing arbitrary software agents to act as collaborators can greatly enrich a wiki since agents can contribute structured data to complement the human-contributed, unstructured-data. For instance, agents can import huge volumes of structured data about entities, enriching the pages, and agents can update wiki pages to reflect real-time information changes (e.g., win-loss records in sports). This paper describes an approach that allows for both arbitrary software agents and human users to collaborate. In particular, we address three key problems: agents updating the correct wiki pages, policies for agent updates, and sharing the schema across collaborators. Using our approach, we describe creating entity-focused wikis which include the ability to create dynamic categories of entities based on their wiki pages. These categories dynamically update their membership based upon real-world changes.

We study several classes of interactive assistants from the points of view of decision theory and computational complexity. We first introduce a special class of POMDPs called hidden-goal MDPs (HGMDPs), which formalize the problem of interactively assisting an agent whose goal is hidden and whose actions are observable. In spite of its restricted nature, we show that optimal action selection in finite horizon HGMDPs is PSPACE-complete even in domains with deterministic dynamics. We then introduce a more restricted model called helper action MDPs (HAMDPs), where the assistant’s action is accepted by the agent when it is helpful, and can be easily ignored by the agent otherwise. We show classes of HAMDPs that are complete for PSPACE and NP along with a polynomial time class. Furthermore, we show that for general HAMDPs a simple myopic policy achieves a regret, compared to an omniscient assistant, that is bounded by the entropy of the initial goal distribution. A variation of this policy is also shown to achieve worst-case regret that is logarithmic in the number of goals for any goal distribution.

Present-day programs are brittle as computers are notoriously lacking in common sense. While significant progress has been made in building large common sense knowledge bases, they are intrinsically incomplete and inconsistent. This paper presents a novel approach to bridging the gaps between multiple knowledge bases, making it possible to answer queries based on knowledge collected from multiple sources without a common ontology. New assertions are found by computing graph similarity with principle component analysis to draw analogies across multiple knowledge bases. Experiments are designed to find new assertions for a Chinese commonsense knowledge base using the OMCS ConceptNet and similarly for WordNet. The assertions are voted by online users to verify that 75.77% / 77.59% for Chinese ConceptNet / WordNet respectively are good, despite the low overlap in coverage among the knowledge bases.

The overall goal of our research is the automatic recognition of the intended message of a grouped bar chart. This paper presents our preliminary work on a system that utilizes the communicative signals in a grouped bar chart as evidence in a Bayesian network that hypothesizes the primary message conveyed by the graphic. The paper discusses the kinds of communicative signals present in grouped bar charts and an ACT-R model for computationalizing one important communicative signal, the relative effort involved in performing the perceptual tasks necessary for the recognition. It also describes our Bayesian network and its implementation on a subset of the kinds of messages that can be conveyed by grouped bar charts.