We study the problem of learning the preferences of drivers and planners in the context of last mile delivery. Given a data set containing historical decisions and delivery locations, the goal is to capture the implicit preferences of the decision-makers. We consider two ways to use the historical data: one is through a probability estimation method that learns transition probabilities between stops (or zones). This is a fast and accurate method, recently studied in a VRP setting. Furthermore, we explore the use of machine learning to infer how to best balance multiple objectives such as distance, probability and penalties. Specifically, we cast the learning problem as a structured output prediction problem, where training is done by repeatedly calling the TSP solver. Another important aspect we consider is that for last-mile delivery, every address is a potential client and hence the data is very sparse. Hence, we propose a two-stage approach that first learns preferences at the zone level in order to compute a zone routing; after which a penalty-based TSP computes the stop routing. Results show that the zone transition probability estimation performs well, and that the structured output prediction learning can improve the results further. We hence showcase a successful combination of both probability estimation and machine learning, all the while using standard TSP solvers, both during learning and to compute the final solution; this means the methodology is applicable to other, real-life, TSP variants, or proprietary solvers.

This webinar brings together a diverse group of scholars and experts to discuss some of the inequity and systemic vulnerabilities of covid-19 pandemic. Nathaniel Osgood serves as Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Saskatchewan, and Director of the Computational Epidemiology and Public Health Informatics Laboratory. His research focuses on combining tools from Systems Science, Data Science, Computational Science and Mathematics to inform decision making in health & health care. Dr. Osgood serves as Chief Research Advisor for the Saskatchewan Centre for Patient Oriented Research and has contributed to or co-led over a dozen initiatives involving people with lived experience with dynamic modeling, machine learning and/or big data collection efforts. Dr. Osgood served as the technical director of COVID-19 modeling for the Province of Saskatchewan from March 2020-April 2021.

Natural disasters ravage the world's cities, valleys, and shores on a regular basis. Deploying precise and efficient computational mechanisms for assessing infrastructure damage is essential to channel resources and minimize the loss of life. Using a dataset that includes labeled pre- and post- disaster satellite imagery, we take a machine learning-based remote sensing approach and train multiple convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to assess building damage on a per-building basis. We present a novel methodology of interpretable deep learning that seeks to explicitly investigate the most useful modalities of information in the training data to create an accurate classification model. We also investigate which loss functions best optimize these models. Our findings include that ordinal-cross entropy loss is the most optimal criterion for optimization to use and that including the type of disaster that caused the damage in combination with pre- and post-disaster training data most accurately predicts the level of damage caused. Further, we make progress in the qualitative representation of which parts of the images that the model is using to predict damage levels, through gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM). Our research seeks to computationally contribute to aiding in this ongoing and growing humanitarian crisis, heightened by anthropogenic climate change.

Predicting the emergence of links in large evolving networks is a difficult task with many practical applications. Recently, the Science4cast competition has illustrated this challenge presenting a network of 64.000 AI concepts and asking the participants to predict which topics are going to be researched together in the future. In this paper, we present a solution to this problem based on a new family of deep learning approaches, namely Graph Neural Networks. The results of the challenge show that our solution is competitive even if we had to impose severe restrictions to obtain a computationally efficient and parsimonious model: ignoring the intrinsic dynamics of the graph and using only a small subset of the nodes surrounding a target link. Preliminary experiments presented in this paper suggest the model is learning two related, but different patterns: the absorption of a node by a sub-graph and union of more dense sub-graphs. The model seems to excel at recognizing the first type of pattern.

Beat is the fastest growing ride hailing app in Latin America and a part of the international FreeNow Group, the multi-service mobility joint venture backed by BMW Group and Daimler AG. One city at a time, we are on a mission to develop seamless mobility for a safe and sustainable urban life. We are proud to say we have launched Beat Tesla / Loonshot, the first and largest private all-electric vehicle service in Latin America. As an organization, we are committed to our drivers with ethical practices and a safe working environment. To our customers, we differentiate ourselves from other ride-hailing apps with our super user-friendly app and excellent customer service.

Language models built using semi-supervised machine learning on large corpora of natural language have very quickly enveloped the fields of natural language generation and understanding. In this paper we apply a zero-shot approach independently developed by a number of researchers now gaining recognition as a significant alternative to fine-tuning for evaluation on common sense tasks. A language model with relatively few parameters and training steps compared to a more recent language model (T5) can outperform it on a recent large data set (TimeDial), while displaying robustness in its performance across a similar class of language tasks. Surprisingly, this result is achieved by using a hyperparameter-free zero-shot method with the smaller model, compared to fine-tuning to the larger model. We argue that robustness of the smaller model ought to be understood in terms of compositionality, in a sense that we draw from recent literature on a class of similar models. We identify a practical cost for our method and model: high GPU-time for natural language evaluation. The zero-shot measurement technique that produces remarkable stability, both for ALBERT and other BERT variants, is an application of pseudo-log-likelihoods to masked language models for the relative measurement of probability for substitution alternatives in forced choice language tasks such as the Winograd Schema Challenge, Winogrande, and others. One contribution of this paper is to bring together a number of similar, but independent strands of research. We produce some absolute state-of-the-art results for common sense reasoning in binary choice tasks, performing better than any published result in the literature, including fine-tuned efforts. We show a remarkable consistency of the model's performance under adversarial settings, which we argue is best explained by the model's compositionality of representations.

This paper offers a comprehensive survey of recent developments in 3D object detection covering the full pipeline from input data, over data representation and feature extraction to the actual detection modules. We include basic concepts, focus our survey on a broad spectrum of different approaches arising in the last ten years and propose a systematization which offers a practical framework to compare those approaches on the methods level.

In model extraction attacks, adversaries can steal a machine learning model exposed via a public API by repeatedly querying it and adjusting their own model based on obtained predictions. To prevent model stealing, existing defenses focus on detecting malicious queries, truncating, or distorting outputs, thus necessarily introducing a tradeoff between robustness and model utility for legitimate users. Instead, we propose to impede model extraction by requiring users to complete a proof-of-work before they can read the model's predictions. This deters attackers by greatly increasing (even up to 100x) the computational effort needed to leverage query access for model extraction. Since we calibrate the effort required to complete the proof-of-work to each query, this only introduces a slight overhead for regular users (up to 2x). To achieve this, our calibration applies tools from differential privacy to measure the information revealed by a query. Our method requires no modification of the victim model and can be applied by machine learning practitioners to guard their publicly exposed models against being easily stolen. Model extraction attacks (Tramèr et al., 2016; Jagielski et al., 2020; Zanella-Beguelin et al., 2021) are a threat to the confidentiality of machine learning (ML) models. They are also used as reconnaissance prior to mounting other attacks, for example, if an adversary wishes to disguise some spam message to get it past a target spam filter (Lowd & Meek, 2005), or generate adversarial examples (Biggio et al., 2013; Szegedy et al., 2014) using the extracted model (Papernot et al., 2017b). Furthermore, an adversary can extract a functionally similar model even without access to any real input training data (Krishna et al., 2020; Truong et al., 2021; Miura et al., 2021) while bypassing the long and expensive process of data procuring, cleaning, and preprocessing. This harms the interests of the model owner and infringes on their intellectual property. Defenses against model extraction can be categorized as active, passive, or reactive. Passive defenses try to detect an attack (Juuti et al., 2019) or truncate outputs (Tramèr et al., 2016), but these methods lower the quality of results for legitimate users. The main reactive defenses against model extraction attacks are watermarking (Jia et al., 2020b), dataset inference (Maini et al., 2021), and proof of learning (Jia et al., 2021). However, reactive approaches address model extraction post hoc, i.e., after the attack has been completed. We design a pro-active defense that prevents model stealing before it succeeds. Specifically, we aim to increase the computational cost of model extraction without lowering the quality of model outputs. Our method is based on the concept of proof-of-work (PoW) and its main steps are presented as a block diagram in Figure 1.

It is widely acknowledged that transparency of automated decision making is crucial for deployability of intelligent systems, and explaining the reasons why some decisions are "good" and some are not is a way to achieving this transparency. We consider two variants of decision making, where "good" decisions amount to alternatives (i) meeting "most" goals, and (ii) meeting "most preferred" goals. We then define, for each variant and notion of "goodness" (corresponding to a number of existing notions in the literature), explanations in two formats, for justifying the selection of an alternative to audiences with differing needs and competences: lean explanations, in terms of goals satisfied and, for some notions of "goodness", alternative decisions, and argumentative explanations, reflecting the decision process leading to the selection, while corresponding to the lean explanations. To define argumentative explanations, we use assumption-based argumentation (ABA), a well-known form of structured argumentation. Specifically, we define ABA frameworks such that "good" decisions are admissible ABA arguments and draw argumentative explanations from dispute trees sanctioning this admissibility. Finally, we instantiate our overall framework for explainable decision-making to accommodate connections between goals and decisions in terms of decision graphs incorporating defeasible and non-defeasible information.

A number of approaches have dealt with statistical assessment of self-similarity, and many of those are based on multiscale concepts. Most rely on certain distributional assumptions which are usually violated by real data traces, often characterized by large temporal or spatial mean level shifts, missing values or extreme observations. A novel, robust approach based on Theil-type weighted regression is proposed for estimating self-similarity in two-dimensional data (images). The method is compared to two traditional estimation techniques that use wavelet decompositions; ordinary least squares (OLS) and Abry-Veitch bias correcting estimator (AV). As an application, the suitability of the self-similarity estimate resulting from the the robust approach is illustrated as a predictive feature in the classification of digitized mammogram images as cancerous or non-cancerous. The diagnostic employed here is based on the properties of image backgrounds, which is typically an unused modality in breast cancer screening. Classification results show nearly 68% accuracy, varying slightly with the choice of wavelet basis, and the range of multiresolution levels used.