Look-back, an improved decoding algorithm that leverages the Kullback-Leibler divergence Figure 1: Maximum similarity of hidden states and to track the distribution distance between current normalized minimum KL divergence between current and historical decoding steps. Thus Lookback step and history (a) or prefix (b) from GPT2 on 1,000 can automatically predict potential repetitive instances of WikiText-103. Compared with human continuation, phrase and topic drift, and remove tokens (a): repetition has much smaller minKL but that may cause the failure modes, restricting undistinguishable high maxHidden with history text, (b): the next token probability distribution within a pseudo topic drift by switching to continuation of another plausible distance to the history. We perform instance has much higher minKL but similar high decoding experiments on document continuation maxHidden with prefix text.

In this work, we aim at augmenting the decisions output by quantum models with "error bars" that provide finitesample coverage guarantees. Quantum models implement implicit probabilistic predictors that produce multiple random decisions for each input through measurement shots. Randomness arises not only from the inherent stochasticity of quantum measurements, but also from quantum gate noise and quantum measurement noise caused by noisy hardware. Furthermore, quantum noise may be correlated across shots and it may present drifts in time. This paper proposes to leverage such randomness to define prediction sets for both classification and regression that provably capture the uncertainty of the model. The approach builds on probabilistic conformal prediction (PCP), while accounting for the unique features of quantum models. Among the key technical innovations, we introduce a new general class of non-conformity scores that address the presence of quantum noise, including possible drifts. Experimental results, using both simulators and current quantum computers, confirm the theoretical calibration guarantees of the proposed framework. Quantum machine learning (QML) is currently viewed as a promising paradigm for the optimization of algorithms that can leverage existing noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) computers [1]-[3]. The authors are with the King's Communications, Learning & Information Processing (KCLIP) lab within the Centre for Intelligent Information Processing Systems (CIIPS), Department of Engineering, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, U.K. (e-mail: sangwoo.park@kcl.ac.uk; osvaldo.simeone@kcl.ac.uk). This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement No. 725732), by the European Union's Horizon Europe project CENTRIC (101096379), by an Open Fellowship of the EPSRC (EP/W024101/1), by the EPSRC project (EP/X011852/1), and by Project REASON, a UK Government funded project under the Future Open Networks Research Challenge (FONRC) sponsored by the Department of Science Innovation and Technology (DSIT). This paper addresses the problem of using M samples drawn from quantum model to produce error bars at coverage probability 1 α for the target variable given a test input. The ground-truth (unknown) minimal 1 α conditional support for a regression problem is shown as the gray area.

Textual entailment models are increasingly applied in settings like fact-checking, presupposition verification in question answering, or summary evaluation. However, these represent a significant domain shift from existing entailment datasets, and models underperform as a result. We propose WiCE, a new fine-grained textual entailment dataset built on natural claim and evidence pairs extracted from Wikipedia. In addition to standard claim-level entailment, WiCE provides entailment judgments over sub-sentence units of the claim, and a minimal subset of evidence sentences that support each subclaim. To support this, we propose an automatic claim decomposition strategy using GPT-3.5 which we show is also effective at improving entailment models' performance on multiple datasets at test time. Finally, we show that real claims in our dataset involve challenging verification and retrieval problems that existing models fail to address.

Simulations play a key role for inference in collider physics. We explore various approaches for enhancing the precision of simulations using machine learning, including interventions at the end of the simulation chain (reweighting), at the beginning of the simulation chain (pre-processing), and connections between the end and beginning (latent space refinement). To clearly illustrate our approaches, we use W+jets matrix element surrogate simulations based on normalizing flows as a prototypical example. First, weights in the data space are derived using machine learning classifiers. Then, we pull back the data-space weights to the latent space to produce unweighted examples and employ the Latent Space Refinement (LASER) protocol using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. An alternative approach is an augmented normalizing flow, which allows for different dimensions in the latent and target spaces. These methods are studied for various pre-processing strategies, including a new and general method for massive particles at hadron colliders that is a tweak on the widely-used RAMBO-on-diet mapping. We find that modified simulations can achieve sub-percent precision across a wide range of phase space.

We study model extraction attacks in natural language processing (NLP) where attackers aim to steal victim models by repeatedly querying the open Application Programming Interfaces (APIs). Recent works focus on limited-query budget settings and adopt random sampling or active learning-based sampling strategies on publicly available, unannotated data sources. However, these methods often result in selected queries that lack task relevance and data diversity, leading to limited success in achieving satisfactory results with low query costs. In this paper, we propose MeaeQ (Model extraction attack with efficient Queries), a straightforward yet effective method to address these issues. Specifically, we initially utilize a zero-shot sequence inference classifier, combined with API service information, to filter task-relevant data from a public text corpus instead of a problem domain-specific dataset. Furthermore, we employ a clustering-based data reduction technique to obtain representative data as queries for the attack. Extensive experiments conducted on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that MeaeQ achieves higher functional similarity to the victim model than baselines while requiring fewer queries. Our code is available at https://github.com/C-W-D/MeaeQ.

Today's online platforms rely heavily on algorithmic recommendations to bolster user engagement and drive revenue. However, such algorithmic recommendations can impact diverse stakeholders involved, namely the platform, items (seller), and users (customers), each with their unique objectives. In such multi-sided platforms, finding an appropriate middle ground becomes a complex operational challenge. Motivated by this, we formulate a novel fair recommendation framework, called Problem (FAIR), that not only maximizes the platform's revenue, but also accommodates varying fairness considerations from the perspectives of items and users. Our framework's distinguishing trait lies in its flexibility -- it allows the platform to specify any definitions of item/user fairness that are deemed appropriate, as well as decide the "price of fairness" it is willing to pay to ensure fairness for other stakeholders. We further examine Problem (FAIR) in a dynamic online setting, where the platform needs to learn user data and generate fair recommendations simultaneously in real time, which are two tasks that are often at odds. In face of this additional challenge, we devise a low-regret online recommendation algorithm, called FORM, that effectively balances the act of learning and performing fair recommendation. Our theoretical analysis confirms that FORM proficiently maintains the platform's revenue, while ensuring desired levels of fairness for both items and users. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our framework and method via several case studies on real-world data.

Despite the remarkable ability of large language models (LMs) to comprehend and generate language, they have a tendency to hallucinate and create factually inaccurate output. Augmenting LMs by retrieving information from external knowledge resources is one promising solution. Most existing retrieval augmented LMs employ a retrieve-and-generate setup that only retrieves information once based on the input. This is limiting, however, in more general scenarios involving generation of long texts, where continually gathering information throughout generation is essential. In this work, we provide a generalized view of active retrieval augmented generation, methods that actively decide when and what to retrieve across the course of the generation. We propose Forward-Looking Active REtrieval augmented generation (FLARE), a generic method which iteratively uses a prediction of the upcoming sentence to anticipate future content, which is then utilized as a query to retrieve relevant documents to regenerate the sentence if it contains low-confidence tokens. We test FLARE along with baselines comprehensively over 4 long-form knowledge-intensive generation tasks/datasets. FLARE achieves superior or competitive performance on all tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of our method. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/jzbjyb/FLARE.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable strides in various tasks. Whether LLMs are competitive few-shot solvers for information extraction (IE) tasks, however, remains an open problem. In this work, we aim to provide a thorough answer to this question. Through extensive experiments on nine datasets across four IE tasks, we demonstrate that current advanced LLMs consistently exhibit inferior performance, higher latency, and increased budget requirements compared to fine-tuned SLMs under most settings. Therefore, we conclude that LLMs are not effective few-shot information extractors in general. Nonetheless, we illustrate that with appropriate prompting strategies, LLMs can effectively complement SLMs and tackle challenging samples that SLMs struggle with. And moreover, we propose an adaptive filter-then-rerank paradigm to combine the strengths of LLMs and SLMs. In this paradigm, SLMs serve as filters and LLMs serve as rerankers. By prompting LLMs to rerank a small portion of difficult samples identified by SLMs, our preliminary system consistently achieves promising improvements (2.4% F1-gain on average) on various IE tasks, with an acceptable time and cost investment.

Like most newsreaders, Zae-In wears a microphone pinned to her collar and clutches a stack of notes – but unlike most, her face is entirely fake. A "virtual human" designed by South Korean artificial intelligence company Pulse9, Zae-In spent five months this year reading live news bulletins on national broadcaster SBS. That, you might think, is it then. To adapt the words of another animated newscaster: "I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords." The world belongs to the artificially intelligent and the News at Ten will never be the same again.

Aligning large language models (LLMs) to human values has become increasingly important as it enables sophisticated steering of LLMs. However, it requires significant human demonstrations and feedback or distillation from proprietary LLMs such as ChatGPT. In this work, we propose a novel alignment learning framework with synthetic feedback not dependent on extensive human annotations and proprietary LLMs. First, we perform reward modeling (RM) with synthetic feedback by contrasting responses from vanilla LLMs with various sizes and prompts. Then, we use the RM to simulate high-quality demonstrations to train a supervised policy and further optimize the model with reinforcement learning. Our resulting model, Aligned Language Model with Synthetic Training dataset (ALMoST), outperforms recent open-sourced models, which are trained on the outputs of InstructGPT or human-annotated demonstrations, in alignment benchmarks. In human evaluation, our model is preferred to Alpaca and Dolly-v2, 55.0% and 58.5% of the time, respectively. Further analyses demonstrate the efficacy and importance of synthetic feedback in our framework. The code is available at https://github.com/naver-ai/almost