Edge computing brings a new paradigm in which the sharing of computing, storage, and bandwidth resources as close as possible to the mobile devices or sensors generating a large amount of data. A parallel trend is the rise of phones and tablets as primary computing devices for many people. The powerful sensors present on these devices combined with the fact that they are mobile, mean they have access to data of an unprecedentedly diverse and private nature. Models learned on such data hold the promise of greatly improving usability by powering more intelligent applications, but the sensitive nature of the data means there are risks and responsibilities to storing it in a centralized location. To address the data privacy required for some data in these devices we propose the use of Federated Learning (FL) so that specific data about services performed by clients do not leave the source machines. Instead of sharing data, users collaboratively train a model by only sending weight updates to a server. However, the naive use of FL in those scenarios exposes it to a risk of corruption, whether intentional or not, during the training phase. To improve the security of the FL structure, we propose a decentralized Blockchain-based FL in an edge computing scenario. We also apply blockchain to create a reward mechanism in FL to enable incentive strategy for trainers.

I spent most of the summer sifting through topics, including patents, blood diamonds and police brutality. None of them really stuck. However, on September 16, 2021 I sent Dr. White this email: " In a shocking turn of events, I have found another thing I would like to research. I would like to see if Twitter "coverage" of a publicly traded stock or related phrase ("google" and "search engine") can predict the daily returns of the stock, or changes in the highs/lows/volume of trades. The theory here being that investors' valuation of a stock may be reinforced or informed based on their perception of how others think about the companies (sort of like herd behavior) or their familiarity with the firm in general. If there is an effect, I would particularly like to examine whether this effect has gotten stronger during corona times, as many journalists are claiming that now that everyone is sitting at home with their commission-free trading apps like RobinHood, there are tons of amateur investors in the scene, who may be prone to "window shopping" for hot stocks that make the news.

Precise estimation of Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) is central to evaluating the effectiveness of various road safety treatments and prioritizing infrastructure investment accordingly. While customized study for each countermeasure scenario is desired, the conventional CMF estimation approaches rely heavily on the availability of crash data at given sites. This not only makes the estimation costly, but the results are also less transferable, since the intrinsic similarities between different safety countermeasure scenarios are not fully explored. Aiming to fill this gap, this study introduces a novel knowledge-mining framework for CMF prediction. This framework delves into the connections of existing countermeasures and reduces the reliance of CMF estimation on crash data availability and manual data collection. Specifically, it draws inspiration from human comprehension processes and introduces advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to extract intricate variations and patterns from existing CMF knowledge. It effectively encodes unstructured countermeasure scenarios into machine-readable representations and models the complex relationships between scenarios and CMF values. This new data-driven framework provides a cost-effective and adaptable solution that complements the case-specific approaches for CMF estimation, which is particularly beneficial when availability of crash data or time imposes constraints. Experimental validation using real-world CMF Clearinghouse data demonstrates the effectiveness of this new approach, which shows significant accuracy improvements compared to baseline methods. This approach provides insights into new possibilities of harnessing accumulated transportation knowledge in various applications.

Diabetic eye disease is a major cause of blindness worldwide. The ability to monitor relevant clinical trajectories and detect lapses in care is critical to managing the disease and preventing blindness. Alas, much of the information necessary to support these goals is found only in the free text of the electronic medical record. To fill this information gap, we introduce a system for extracting evidence from clinical text of 19 clinical concepts related to diabetic eye disease and inferring relevant attributes for each. In developing this ophthalmology phenotyping system, we are also afforded a unique opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical language models at adapting to new clinical domains. Across multiple training paradigms, we find that BERT language models pretrained on out-of-distribution clinical data offer no significant improvement over BERT language models pretrained on non-clinical data for our domain. Our study tempers recent claims that language models pretrained on clinical data are necessary for clinical NLP tasks and highlights the importance of not treating clinical language data as a single homogeneous domain.

Pedestrian detection has become a cornerstone of several vision-based applications in modern Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), security, and surveillance. It is the process of identifying human movements in input feeds from data acquisition devices, like visual cameras, and thermopile sensors, for semantic understanding of a scene. It is more significant than other forms of object detection since it addresses the safety concerns of the people. Thus, it has stringent operational criteria, such as higher detection accuracy and real-time performance, which are of paramount importance to the aforesaid smart systems. To address this, there are several methods have been introduced by computer vision and machine learning researchers through exploiting technological advancements as illustrated in Figure 1.

Detecting COVID-19 patients using Computed Tomography (CT) images of the lungs is an active area of research. Datasets of CT images from COVID-19 patients are becoming available. Deep learning (DL) solutions and in particular Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved impressive results for the classification of COVID-19 CT images, but only when the training and testing take place within the same dataset. Work on the cross-dataset problem is still limited and the achieved results are low. Our work tackles the cross-dataset problem through a Domain Adaptation (DA) technique with deep learning. Our proposed solution, COVID19-DANet, is based on pre-trained CNN backbone for feature extraction. For this task, we select the pre-trained Efficientnet-B3 CNN because it has achieved impressive classification accuracy in previous work. The backbone CNN is followed by a prototypical layer which is a concept borrowed from prototypical networks in few-shot learning (FSL). It computes a cosine distance between given samples and the class prototypes and then converts them to class probabilities using the Softmax function. To train the COVID19-DANet model, we propose a combined loss function that is composed of the standard cross-entropy loss for class discrimination and another entropy loss computed over the unlabelled target set only. This so-called unlabelled target entropy loss is minimized and maximized in an alternative fashion, to reach the two objectives of class discrimination and domain invariance. COVID19-DANet is tested under four cross-dataset scenarios using the SARS-CoV-2-CT and COVID19-CT datasets and has achieved encouraging results compared to recent work in the literature.

Test suites assess natural language processing models' performance on specific functionalities: cases of interest involving model robustness, fairness, or particular linguistic capabilities. They enable fine-grained evaluations of model aspects that would otherwise go unnoticed in standard evaluation datasets, but they do not address the problem of how to fix the failure cases. Previous work has explored functionality learning by fine-tuning models on suite data. While this improves performance on seen functionalities, it often does not generalize to unseen ones and can harm general performance. This paper analyses a fine-tuning-free approach to functionality learning. For each functionality in a suite, we generate a specification instruction that encodes it. We combine the obtained specification instructions to create specification-augmented prompts, which we feed to language models pre-trained on natural instruction data to generate suite predictions. A core aspect of our analysis is to measure the effect that including a set of specifications has on a held-out set of unseen, qualitatively different specifications. Our experiments across four tasks and models ranging from 80M to 175B parameters show that smaller models struggle to follow specification instructions. However, larger models (> 3B params.) can benefit from specifications and even generalize desirable behaviors across functionalities.

SUPERB was proposed to evaluate the generalizability of self-supervised learning (SSL) speech models across various tasks. However, it incurs high computational costs due to the large datasets and diverse tasks. In this paper, we introduce MiniSUPERB, a lightweight benchmark that efficiently evaluates SSL speech models with comparable results to SUPERB but lower computational costs significantly. We carefully select representative tasks, sample datasets, and extract model representations offline. Our approach achieves a Spearman's rank correlation of 0.954 and 0.982 with SUPERB Paper and SUPERB Challenge, respectively. Additionally, we reduce the computational cost by 97% in terms of Multiply-ACcumulate operations (MACs). Furthermore, we evaluate SSL speech models in few-shot scenarios and observe significant variations in their performance. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine both the computational cost of the model itself and the cost of evaluating it on a benchmark.

We consider a collaborative learning setting where the goal of each agent is to improve their own model by leveraging the expertise of collaborators, in addition to their own training data. To facilitate the exchange of expertise among agents, we propose a distillation-based method leveraging shared unlabeled auxiliary data, which is pseudo-labeled by the collective. Central to our method is a trust weighting scheme that serves to adaptively weigh the influence of each collaborator on the pseudo-labels until a consensus on how to label the auxiliary data is reached. We demonstrate empirically that our collaboration scheme is able to significantly boost the performance of individual models in the target domain from which the auxiliary data is sampled. By design, our method adeptly accommodates heterogeneity in model architectures and substantially reduces communication overhead compared to typical collaborative learning methods. At the same time, it can provably mitigate the negative impact of bad models on the collective.

Conversational tutoring systems (CTSs) offer learning experiences driven by natural language interaction. They are known to promote high levels of cognitive engagement and benefit learning outcomes, particularly in reasoning tasks. Nonetheless, the time and cost required to author CTS content is a major obstacle to widespread adoption. In this paper, we introduce a novel type of CTS that leverages the recent advances in large language models (LLMs) in two ways: First, the system induces a tutoring script automatically from a lesson text. Second, the system automates the script orchestration via two LLM-based agents (Ruffle&Riley) with the roles of a student and a professor in a learning-by-teaching format. The system allows a free-form conversation that follows the ITS-typical inner and outer loop structure. In an initial between-subject online user study (N = 100) comparing Ruffle&Riley to simpler QA chatbots and reading activity, we found no significant differences in post-test scores. Nonetheless, in the learning experience survey, Ruffle&Riley users expressed higher ratings of understanding and remembering and further perceived the offered support as more helpful and the conversation as coherent. Our study provides insights for a new generation of scalable CTS technologies.