There is a growing demand for explainable, transparent, and data-driven models within the domain of fraud detection. Decisions made by fraud detection models need to be explainable in the event of a customer dispute. Additionally, the decision-making process in the model must be transparent to win the trust of regulators and business stakeholders. At the same time, fraud detection solutions can benefit from data due to the noisy, dynamic nature of fraud and the availability of large historical data sets. Finally, fraud detection is notorious for its class imbalance: there are typically several orders of magnitude more legitimate transactions than fraudulent ones. In this paper, we present Deep Symbolic Classification (DSC), an extension of the Deep Symbolic Regression framework to classification problems. DSC casts classification as a search problem in the space of all analytic functions composed of a vocabulary of variables, constants, and operations and optimizes for an arbitrary evaluation metric directly. The search is guided by a deep neural network trained with reinforcement learning. Because the functions are mathematical expressions that are in closed-form and concise, the model is inherently explainable both at the level of a single classification decision and the model's decision process. Furthermore, the class imbalance problem is successfully addressed by optimizing for metrics that are robust to class imbalance such as the F1 score. This eliminates the need for oversampling and undersampling techniques that plague traditional approaches. Finally, the model allows to explicitly balance between the prediction accuracy and the explainability. An evaluation on the PaySim data set demonstrates competitive predictive performance with state-of-the-art models, while surpassing them in terms of explainability. This establishes DSC as a promising model for fraud detection systems.

Instruction-tuning is a widely adopted method of finetuning that enables large language models (LLMs) to generate output that more closely resembles human responses to natural language queries, in many cases leading to human-level performance on diverse testbeds. However, it remains unclear whether instruction-tuning truly makes LLMs more similar to how humans process language. We investigate the effect of instruction-tuning on LLM-human similarity in two ways: (1) brain alignment, the similarity of LLM internal representations to neural activity in the human language system, and (2) behavioral alignment, the similarity of LLM and human behavior on a reading task. We assess 25 vanilla and instruction-tuned LLMs across three datasets involving humans reading naturalistic stories and sentences. We discover that instruction-tuning generally enhances brain alignment by an average of 6%, but does not have a similar effect on behavioral alignment. To identify the factors underlying LLM-brain alignment, we compute correlations between the brain alignment of LLMs and various model properties, such as model size, various problem-solving abilities, and performance on tasks requiring world knowledge spanning various domains. Notably, we find a strong positive correlation between brain alignment and model size (r = 0.95), as well as performance on tasks requiring world knowledge (r = 0.81). Our results demonstrate that instruction-tuning LLMs improves both world knowledge representations and brain alignment, suggesting that mechanisms that encode world knowledge in LLMs also improve representational alignment to the human brain.

Group decision making is an important field with interesting applications in various disciplines, among which environmental economics. Group decision, often requires that all or the majority of agents in the group agree to a single proposal or opinion, i.e. consensus. This is particularly true in cases where there is no coercion involved in the implementation of the decision made, so that the implementation of the decision depends on the good will, or rather the acceptance of the common decision by all members of the group. To make the discussion more concrete we consider the following generic situation: Assume that a group of agents, G, has to reach a common decision concerning policies regarding a future contingency X. Policies may refer for instance to the cost of abatement measures for protection against X, which clearly require the acceptance of a commonly acceptable estimate for the value of X by every member of the group as well as the acceptance of a commonly acceptably discount factor. Typically, different member of the group will have different valuations for X, therefore report different costs for the adverse effects of X. Moreover, different members of the group will have different discount rates for calculating the present value of the future adverse effect X.

Active learning aims to enhance model performance by strategically labeling informative data points. While extensively studied, its effectiveness on large-scale, real-world datasets remains underexplored. Existing research primarily focuses on single-source data, ignoring the multi-domain nature of real-world data. We introduce a multi-domain active learning benchmark to bridge this gap. Our benchmark demonstrates that traditional single-domain active learning strategies are often less effective than random selection in multi-domain scenarios. We also introduce CLIP-GeoYFCC, a novel large-scale image dataset built around geographical domains, in contrast to existing genre-based domain datasets. Analysis on our benchmark shows that all multi-domain strategies exhibit significant tradeoffs, with no strategy outperforming across all datasets or all metrics, emphasizing the need for future research.

The unstructured nature of data used in foundation model development is a challenge to systematic analyses for making data use and documentation decisions. From a Responsible AI perspective, these decisions often rely upon understanding how people are represented in data. We propose a framework designed to guide analysis of human representation in unstructured data and identify downstream risks. We apply the framework in two toy examples using the Common Crawl web text corpus (C4) and LAION-400M. We also propose a set of hypothetical action steps in service of dataset use, development, and documentation.

Data curation tasks that prepare data for analytics are critical for turning data into actionable insights. However, due to the diverse requirements of applications in different domains, generic off-the-shelf tools are typically insufficient. As a result, data scientists often have to develop domain-specific solutions tailored to both the dataset and the task, e.g. writing domain-specific code or training machine learning models on a sufficient number of annotated examples. This process is notoriously difficult and time-consuming. We present SEED, an LLM-as-compiler approach that automatically generates domain-specific data curation solutions via Large Language Models (LLMs). Once the user describes a task, input data, and expected output, the SEED compiler produces an executable pipeline composed of LLM-generated code, small model, and data access modules. SEED uses these generated modules to process most of the data records and dynamically decides when the LLM should step in to directly process some individual records, possibly using the data-access modules to retrieve relevant information from the data sources to assist the LLM in solving the task. To validate this new, revolutionary approach, we conducted experiments on 9 datasets spanning over 5 data curation tasks. The results show that SEED generates domain-specific solutions that significantly outperform their generic counterparts, often approaching the performance of the manually curated solutions that use thousands of labeled training examples. Moreover, in comparison to solutions that use the LLM on every data record, SEED achieves state-of-the-art or comparable few-shot performance, while significantly reducing the number of LLM calls.

Accurate image reconstruction is at the heart of diagnostics in medical imaging. Supervised deep learning-based approaches have been investigated for solving inverse problems including image reconstruction. However, these trained models encounter unseen data distributions that are widely shifted from training data during deployment. Therefore, it is essential to assess whether a given input falls within the training data distribution for diagnostic purposes. Uncertainty estimation approaches exist but focus on providing an uncertainty map to radiologists, rather than assessing the training distribution fit. In this work, we propose a method based on the local Lipschitz-based metric to distinguish out-of-distribution images from in-distribution with an area under the curve of 99.94%. Empirically, we demonstrate a very strong relationship between the local Lipschitz value and mean absolute error (MAE), supported by a high Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of 0.8475, which determines the uncertainty estimation threshold for optimal model performance. Through the identification of false positives, the local Lipschitz and MAE relationship was used to guide data augmentation and reduce model uncertainty. Our study was validated using the AUTOMAP architecture for sensor-to-image Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) reconstruction. We compare our proposed approach with baseline methods: Monte-Carlo dropout and deep ensembles, and further analysis included MRI denoising and Computed Tomography (CT) sparse-to-full view reconstruction using UNET architectures. We show that our approach is applicable to various architectures and learned functions, especially in the realm of medical image reconstruction, where preserving the diagnostic accuracy of reconstructed images remains paramount.

Binary phylogenetic trees inferred from biological data are central to understanding the shared evolutionary history of organisms. Inferring the placement of latent nodes in a tree by any optimality criterion (e.g., maximum likelihood) is an NP-hard problem, propelling the development of myriad heuristic approaches. Yet, these heuristics often lack a systematic means of uniformly sampling random trees or effectively exploring a tree space that grows factorially, which are crucial to optimisation problems such as machine learning. Phylo2Vec maps any binary tree with n leaves to an integer vector of length n 1. We prove that Phylo2Vec is both well-defined and bijective to the space of phylogenetic trees. The advantages of Phylo2Vec are twofold: i) easy uniform sampling of binary trees and ii) systematic ability to traverse tree space in very large or small jumps. As a proof of concept, we use Phylo2Vec for maximum likelihood inference on five real-world datasets and show that a simple hill climbing-based optimisation can efficiently traverse the vastness of tree space from a random to an optimal tree. Phylogenetic trees are a fundamental tool in depicting evolutionary processes, whether linguistic (evolution of different languages and language families) or biological (evolution of biological entities). In the latter field, phylogenetic trees are integral to multiple research domains, including evolution (Morlon et al., 2010), conservation (Rolland et al., 2011), and epidemiology, where they allow us to better understand infectious disease transmission dynamics (Ypma et al., 2013; Faria et al., 2021). A multitude of computer-readable formats have been proposed to store and represent (binary) phylogenetic trees. While basic data structures such as arrays or linked lists can be used for this purpose, the Newick format, as outlined by Olsen (1990) and Felsenstein (2004), has emerged as the standard notation. Each parenthesis encloses a pair of leaf nodes or subtrees, separated by a comma.

Contrastive learning is a highly successful technique for learning representations of data from labeled tuples, specifying the distance relations within the tuple. We study the sample complexity of contrastive learning, i.e. the minimum number of labeled tuples sufficient for getting high generalization accuracy. We give tight bounds on the sample complexity in a variety of settings, focusing on arbitrary distance functions, both general $\ell_p$-distances, and tree metrics. Our main result is an (almost) optimal bound on the sample complexity of learning $\ell_p$-distances for integer $p$. For any $p \ge 1$ we show that $\tilde \Theta(\min(nd,n^2))$ labeled tuples are necessary and sufficient for learning $d$-dimensional representations of $n$-point datasets. Our results hold for an arbitrary distribution of the input samples and are based on giving the corresponding bounds on the Vapnik-Chervonenkis/Natarajan dimension of the associated problems. We further show that the theoretical bounds on sample complexity obtained via VC/Natarajan dimension can have strong predictive power for experimental results, in contrast with the folklore belief about a substantial gap between the statistical learning theory and the practice of deep learning.

Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com. City lawmakers in Brazil have enacted what appears to be the nation's first legislation written entirely by artificial intelligence -- even if they didn't know it at the time. The experimental ordinance was passed in October in the southern city of Porto Alegre and city councilman Ramiro Rosário revealed this week that it was written by a chatbot, sparking objections and raising questions about the role of artificial intelligence in public policy. Rosário told The Associated Press that he asked OpenAI's chatbot ChatGPT to craft a proposal to prevent the city from charging taxpayers to replace water consumption meters if they are stolen.