Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Arica



f66340d6f28dae6aab0176892c9065e7-Supplemental-Conference.pdf

Neural Information Processing Systems

Once closed-form expressions for these Jacobians are derived, it remains to substitute those expressions into (16). The following identity (often termed the "vec" rule) will To depict the spatial topographies of the latent components measured on the EEG and fMRI analyses, the "forward-model" [ The results of the comparison are shown in Fig S1, where it is clear that the signal fidelity of the GCs (right panel) significantly exceeds those yielded by PCA (left) and ICA (middle). GCA is only able to recover sources with temporal dependencies (i.e., s Both the single electrodes and Granger components exhibit two pronounced peaks in the spectra: one near 2 Hz ("delta" Fig S3 shows the corresponding result for the left motor imagery condition. EEG motor imagery dataset described in the main text. For each technique, the first 6 components are presented.


Granger Components Analysis: Unsupervised learning of latent temporal dependencies

Neural Information Processing Systems

Here the concept of Granger causality is employed to propose a new criterion for unsupervised learning that is appropriate in the case of temporally-dependent source signals. The basic idea is to identify two projections of a multivariate time series such that the Granger causality among the resulting pair of components is maximized.






Appendices This is the supplemental material forOptimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction throughGradientBoostingandApplicationtoMulti-scaleGraphNeuralNetworks

Neural Information Processing Systems

Proposition 1 is a part of the following proposition. We shall prove this proposition in the end of this section. The proof is the extension of [18, Exercises 3.11] to the transductive and multi-layer setting. See also the proof of [20, Theorem 3]. Therefore, itissufficient that we first prove the proposition by assuming P(s) = IN for alls = 2,...,t and then replaceX with By definition, the transductive Rademacher variable of parameterp = 1/2 equals to the (inductive) Rademacher variable.