Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) has proven highly effective in enhancing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on tasks that require external knowledge. By leveraging Knowledge Graphs (KGs), GraphRAG improves information retrieval for complex reasoning tasks, providing more precise and comprehensive retrieval and generating more accurate responses to QAs. However, most RAG methods fall short in addressing multi-step reasoning, particularly when both information extraction and inference are necessary. To address this limitation, this paper presents Knowledge Graph-Based Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KG-IRAG), a novel framework that integrates KGs with iterative reasoning to improve LLMs' ability to handle queries involving temporal and logical dependencies. Through iterative retrieval steps, KG-IRAG incrementally gathers relevant data from external KGs, enabling step-by-step reasoning. The proposed approach is particularly suited for scenarios where reasoning is required alongside dynamic temporal data extraction, such as determining optimal travel times based on weather conditions or traffic patterns. Experimental results show that KG-IRAG improves accuracy in complex reasoning tasks by effectively integrating external knowledge with iterative, logic-based retrieval. Additionally, three new datasets: weatherQA-Irish, weatherQA-Sydney, and trafficQA-TFNSW, are formed to evaluate KG-IRAG's performance, demonstrating its potential beyond traditional RAG applications.

As narrative extraction systems grow in complexity, establishing user trust through interpretable and explainable outputs becomes increasingly critical. This paper presents an evaluation of an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) system for narrative map extraction that provides meaningful explanations across multiple levels of abstraction. Our system integrates explanations based on topical clusters for low-level document relationships, connection explanations for event relationships, and high-level structure explanations for overall narrative patterns. In particular, we evaluate the XAI system through a user study involving 10 participants that examined narratives from the 2021 Cuban protests. The analysis of results demonstrates that participants using the explanations made the users trust in the system's decisions, with connection explanations and important event detection proving particularly effective at building user confidence. Survey responses indicate that the multi-level explanation approach helped users develop appropriate trust in the system's narrative extraction capabilities.

Urban traffic forecasting is a commonly encountered problem, with wide-ranging applications in fields such as urban planning, civil engineering and transport. In this paper, we study the enhancement of traffic forecasting with pre-training, focusing on spatio-temporal graph methods. While various machine learning methods to solve traffic forecasting problems have been explored and extensively studied, there is a gap of a more contextual approach: studying how relevant non-traffic data can improve prediction performance on traffic forecasting problems. We call this data spatial context. We introduce a novel method of combining road and traffic information through the notion of a traffic quotient graph, a quotient graph formed from road geometry and traffic sensors. We also define a way to encode this relationship in the form of a geometric encoder, pre-trained using contrastive learning methods and enhanced with OpenStreetMap data. We introduce and discuss ways to integrate this geometric encoder with existing graph neural network (GNN)-based traffic forecasting models, using a contrastive pre-training paradigm. We demonstrate the potential for this hybrid model to improve generalisation and performance with zero additional traffic data. Code for this paper is available at https://github.com/mattchrlw/forecasting-on-new-roads.

In Recent Years, Digital Technologies Have Made Significant Strides In Augmenting-Human-Health, Cognition, And Perception, Particularly Within The Field Of Computational-Pathology. This Paper Presents A Novel Approach To Enhancing The Analysis Of Histopathology Images By Leveraging A Mult-modal-Model That Combines Vision Transformers (Vit) With Gpt-2 For Image Captioning. The Model Is Fine-Tuned On The Specialized Arch-Dataset, Which Includes Dense Image Captions Derived From Clinical And Academic Resources, To Capture The Complexities Of Pathology Images Such As Tissue Morphologies, Staining Variations, And Pathological Conditions. By Generating Accurate, Contextually Captions, The Model Augments The Cognitive Capabilities Of Healthcare Professionals, Enabling More Efficient Disease Classification, Segmentation, And Detection. The Model Enhances The Perception Of Subtle Pathological Features In Images That Might Otherwise Go Unnoticed, Thereby Improving Diagnostic Accuracy. Our Approach Demonstrates The Potential For Digital Technologies To Augment Human Cognitive Abilities In Medical Image Analysis, Providing Steps Toward More Personalized And Accurate Healthcare Outcomes.

AI-driven outcomes can be challenging for end-users to understand. Explanations can address two key questions: "Why this outcome?" (factual) and "Why not another?" (counterfactual). While substantial efforts have been made to formalize factual explanations, a precise and comprehensive study of counterfactual explanations is still lacking. This paper proposes a formal definition of counterfactual explanations, proving some properties they satisfy, and examining the relationship with factual explanations. Given that multiple counterfactual explanations generally exist for a specific case, we also introduce a rigorous method to rank these counterfactual explanations, going beyond a simple minimality condition, and to identify the optimal ones. Our experiments with 12 real-world datasets highlight that, in most cases, a single optimal counterfactual explanation emerges. We also demonstrate, via three metrics, that the selected optimal explanation exhibits higher representativeness and can explain a broader range of elements than a random minimal counterfactual. This result highlights the effectiveness of our approach in identifying more robust and comprehensive counterfactual explanations.

This paper explores pruning attention heads as a post-processing bias mitigation method for large language models (LLMs). Modern AI systems such as LLMs are expanding into sensitive social contexts where fairness concerns become especially crucial. Since LLMs develop decision-making patterns by training on massive datasets of human-generated content, they naturally encode and perpetuate societal biases. While modifying training datasets and algorithms is expensive and requires significant resources; post-processing techniques-such as selectively deactivating neurons and attention heads in pre-trained LLMs-can provide feasible and effective approaches to improve fairness. However, identifying the optimal subset of parameters to prune presents a combinatorial challenge within LLMs' immense parameter space, requiring solutions that efficiently balance competing objectives across the frontiers of model fairness and utility. To address the computational challenges, we explore a search-based program repair approach via randomized simulated annealing. Given the prohibitive evaluation costs in billion-parameter LLMs, we develop surrogate deep neural networks that efficiently model the relationship between attention head states (active/inactive) and their corresponding fairness/utility metrics. This allows us to perform optimization over the surrogate models and efficiently identify optimal subsets of attention heads for selective pruning rather than directly searching through the LLM parameter space. This paper introduces Attention Pruning, a fairness-aware surrogate simulated annealing approach to prune attention heads in LLMs that disproportionately contribute to bias while minimally impacting overall model utility. Our experiments show that Attention Pruning achieves up to $40\%$ reduction in gender bias and outperforms the state-of-the-art bias mitigation strategies.

Since the proliferation of LLMs, there have been concerns about their misuse for harmful content creation and spreading. Recent studies justify such fears, providing evidence of LLM vulnerabilities and high potential of their misuse. Humans are no longer able to distinguish between high-quality machine-generated and authentic human-written texts. Therefore, it is crucial to develop automated means to accurately detect machine-generated content. It would enable to identify such content in online information space, thus providing an additional information about its credibility. This work addresses the problem by proposing a robust fine-tuning process of LLMs for the detection task, making the detectors more robust against obfuscation and more generalizable to out-of-distribution data.

X, XX 2025 1 Deep Contrastive Unlearning for Language Models Estrid He, Tabinda Sarwar, Ibrahim Khalil, Xun Yi, and Ke Wang Abstract --The past a few years have witnessed the great success of large language models, demonstrating powerful capabilities in comprehending textual data and generating humanlike languages. Thus, to safeguard individuals' "right to be forgotten", there has been increasing interests in machine unlearning - the process of removing information carried by particular training samples from a model while not deteriorating its predictive quality. This is a challenging task due to the black-box nature of language models. Most existing studies focus on mitigating the impact of those forgot samples upon a model's outputs, and do not explicitly consider the geometric distributions of samples in the latent space of a model. T o address this issue, we propose a machine unlearning framework, named Deep C ontrastive U nlearning for fine-T uning (DeepCUT) language models. Our proposed model achieves machine unlearning by directly optimizing the latent space of a model. Comprehensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of DeepCUT with consistent and significant improvement over baseline methods. I NTRODUCTION I N the existing digital era, the availability of user-contributed data has increased exponentially. The rich and diverse data has been the engine of the significant advancements in the development of natural language processing (NLP) models. In the past a few years, the introduction of Transformer architecture [1] has revolutionized NLP, enabling language models such as BERT [2], RoBERTa [3].

In light of rising drug-related concerns and the increasing role of social media, sales and discussions of illicit drugs have become commonplace online. Social media platforms hosting user-generated content must therefore perform content moderation, which is a difficult task due to the vast amount of jargon used in drug discussions. Previous works on drug jargon detection were limited to extracting a list of terms, but these approaches have fundamental problems in practical application. First, they are trivially evaded using word substitutions. Second, they cannot distinguish whether euphemistic terms such as "pot" or "crack" are being used as drugs or in their benign meanings. We argue that drug content moderation should be done using contexts rather than relying on a banlist. However, manually annotated datasets for training such a task are not only expensive but also prone to becoming obsolete. We present JEDIS, a framework for detecting illicit drug jargon terms by analyzing their contexts. JEDIS utilizes a novel approach that combines distant supervision and delexicalization, which allows JEDIS to be trained without human-labeled data while being robust to new terms and euphemisms. Experiments on two manually annotated datasets show JEDIS significantly outperforms state-of-the-art word-based baselines in terms of F1-score and detection coverage in drug jargon detection. We also conduct qualitative analysis that demonstrates JEDIS is robust against pitfalls faced by existing approaches.

Monitoring forest dynamics at an individual tree scale is essential for accurately assessing ecosystem responses to climate change, yet traditional methods relying on field-based forest inventories are labor-intensive and limited in spatial coverage. Advances in remote sensing using drone-acquired RGB imagery combined with deep learning models have promised precise individual tree crown (ITC) segmentation; however, existing methods are frequently validated against human-annotated images, lacking rigorous independent ground truth. In this study, we generate high-fidelity validation labels from co-located Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) data for drone imagery of mixed unmanaged boreal and Mediterranean forests. We evaluate the performance of two widely used deep learning ITC segmentation models - DeepForest (RetinaNet) and Detectree2 (Mask R-CNN) - on these data, and compare to performance on further Mediterranean forest data labelled manually. When validated against TLS-derived ground truth from Mediterranean forests, model performance decreased significantly compared to assessment based on hand-labelled from an ecologically similar site (AP50: 0.094 vs. 0.670). Restricting evaluation to only canopy trees shrank this gap considerably (Canopy AP50: 0.365), although performance was still far lower than on similar hand-labelled data. Models also performed poorly on boreal forest data (AP50: 0.142), although again increasing when evaluated on canopy trees only (Canopy AP50: 0.308). Both models showed very poor localisation accuracy at stricter IoU thresholds, even when restricted to canopy trees (Max AP75: 0.051). Similar results have been observed in studies using aerial LiDAR data, suggesting fundamental limitations in aerial-based segmentation approaches in closed canopy forests.