Oceania
Supplementary Material: Identification of Partially Observed Linear Causal Models Jeffrey Adams 1, Niels Richard Hansen
Let us present the complete theorem first, and then give its proof. We are now ready to present Theorem 1. Theorem 1 But since F induces a different DAG, F is not identified up to trivialities. Proposition 4. F or any graph G there exists F F There are two cases to consider. The backward direction is obvious. This follows from definitions and acyclicity.1.4.5 Proof of Theorem 3 Theorem 3. Then F is identifiable up to trivialities.
Supplementary: Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Explainer for Graph Neural Networks Caihua Shan
(line 4). We show our RG-Explainer for graph classification in Alg. 2. The algorithm is similar to the one explaining node classifications, except that we train our seed locator to detect the most influential (line 4). Input: The input graph G = ( V, E), node features X, node instances I, and a trained GNN model f () . Check the stopping criteria by Eq. 10. I, and a trained GNN model f () .