The training of a next-best-view (NBV) planner for visual place recognition (VPR) is a fundamentally important task in autonomous robot navigation, for which a typical approach is the use of visual experiences that are collected in the target domain as training data. However, the collection of a wide variety of visual experiences in everyday navigation is costly and prohibitive for real-time robotic applications. We address this issue by employing a novel {\it domain-invariant} NBV planner. A standard VPR subsystem based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) is assumed to be available, and its domain-invariant state recognition ability is proposed to be transferred to train the domain-invariant NBV planner. Specifically, we divide the visual cues that are available from the CNN model into two types: the output layer cue (OLC) and intermediate layer cue (ILC). The OLC is available at the output layer of the CNN model and aims to estimate the state of the robot (e.g., the robot viewpoint) with respect to the world-centric view coordinate system. The ILC is available within the middle layers of the CNN model as a high-level description of the visual content (e.g., a saliency image) with respect to the ego-centric view. In our framework, the ILC and OLC are mapped to a state vector and subsequently used to train a multiview NBV planner via deep reinforcement learning. Experiments using the public NCLT dataset validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Around 3.7 million Australians have been unintentionally caught in an ocean rip. For the unprepared it can be a harrowing experience--but for experienced surfers, rips are a handy way to ride through the whitewash and out to the break. We're not surfers, but we work at Australia's national science agency in "strategic foresight," which you can think of as the study of the currents taking the world into the future. These currents are a bit like ocean rips: they present risks for those who don't understand them, but opportunities for societies, organizations and people who are prepared. We call the biggest currents "megatrends", and in a new report we examine the megatrends that will shape the next 20 years.

Gold mining is one of the very oldest human occupations. The earliest known underground gold mine, in what is now the country of Georgia, dates back at least 5,000 years, when people were just starting to develop written language. Over the centuries, a number of innovations have emerged that disrupted and forever changed how we explore and mine for gold and other metals. Think dynamite, or the steam engine. Lately, however, innovation has slowed.

Alphabet's Q3 financial results, released Tuesday (July 26), showed that Google Search and Google Cloud were big factors in the company's growth, along with greater innovations around artificial intelligence (AI). "In the second quarter our performance was driven by Search and Cloud," Alphabet and Google CEO Sundar Pichai said. "The investments we've made over the years in AI and computing are helping to make our services particularly valuable for consumers, and highly effective for businesses of all sizes. "As we sharpen our focus, we'll continue to invest responsibly in deep computer science for the long-term." Chief Financial Officer Ruth Porat added that the company had a "solid performance" in the quarter.

Current AI systems are designed to solve close-world problems with the assumption that the underlying world is remaining more or less the same. However, when dealing with real-world problems such assumptions can be invalid as sudden and unexpected changes can occur. To effectively deploy AI-powered systems in the real world, AI systems should be able to deal with open-world novelty quickly. Inevitably, dealing with open-world novelty raises an important question of novelty difficulty. Knowing whether one novelty is harder to deal with than another, can help researchers to train their systems systematically. In addition, it can also serve as a measurement of the performance of novelty robust AI systems. In this paper, we propose to define the novelty reaction difficulty as a relative difficulty of performing the known task after the introduction of the novelty. We propose a universal method that can be applied to approximate the difficulty. We present the approximations of the difficulty using our method and show how it aligns with the results of the evaluation of AI agents designed to deal with novelty.

We introduce RealTime QA, a dynamic question answering (QA) platform that announces questions and evaluates systems on a regular basis (weekly in this version). RealTime QA inquires about the current world, and QA systems need to answer questions about novel events or information. It therefore challenges static, conventional assumptions in open domain QA datasets and pursues, instantaneous applications. We build strong baseline models upon large pretrained language models, including GPT-3 and T5. Our benchmark is an ongoing effort, and this preliminary report presents real-time evaluation results over the past month. Our experimental results show that GPT-3 can often properly update its generation results, based on newly-retrieved documents, highlighting the importance of up-to-date information retrieval. Nonetheless, we find that GPT-3 tends to return outdated answers when retrieved documents do not provide sufficient information to find an answer. This suggests an important avenue for future research: can an open domain QA system identify such unanswerable cases and communicate with the user or even the retrieval module to modify the retrieval results? We hope that RealTime QA will spur progress in instantaneous applications of question answering and beyond.

A combinatorial recommender (CR) system feeds a list of items to a user at a time in the result page, in which the user behavior is affected by both contextual information and items. The CR is formulated as a combinatorial optimization problem with the objective of maximizing the recommendation reward of the whole list. Despite its importance, it is still a challenge to build a practical CR system, due to the efficiency, dynamics, personalization requirement in online environment. In particular, we tear the problem into two sub-problems, list generation and list evaluation. Novel and practical model architectures are designed for these sub-problems aiming at jointly optimizing effectiveness and efficiency. In order to adapt to online case, a bootstrap algorithm forming an actor-critic reinforcement framework is given to explore better recommendation mode in long-term user interaction. Offline and online experiment results demonstrate the efficacy of proposed JDRec framework. JDRec has been applied in online JD recommendation, improving click through rate by 2.6% and synthetical value for the platform by 5.03%. We will publish the large-scale dataset used in this study to contribute to the research community.

Analyzing classification model performance is a crucial task for machine learning practitioners. While practitioners often use count-based metrics derived from confusion matrices, like accuracy, many applications, such as weather prediction, sports betting, or patient risk prediction, rely on a classifier's predicted probabilities rather than predicted labels. In these instances, practitioners are concerned with producing a calibrated model, that is, one which outputs probabilities that reflect those of the true distribution. Model calibration is often analyzed visually, through static reliability diagrams, however, the traditional calibration visualization may suffer from a variety of drawbacks due to the strong aggregations it necessitates. Furthermore, count-based approaches are unable to sufficiently analyze model calibration. We present Calibrate, an interactive reliability diagram that addresses the aforementioned issues. Calibrate constructs a reliability diagram that is resistant to drawbacks in traditional approaches, and allows for interactive subgroup analysis and instance-level inspection. We demonstrate the utility of Calibrate through use cases on both real-world and synthetic data. We further validate Calibrate by presenting the results of a think-aloud experiment with data scientists who routinely analyze model calibration.

Restless Multi-Armed Bandits (RMAB) is an apt model to represent decision-making problems in public health interventions (e.g., tuberculosis, maternal, and child care), anti-poaching planning, sensor monitoring, personalized recommendations and many more. Existing research in RMAB has contributed mechanisms and theoretical results to a wide variety of settings, where the focus is on maximizing expected value. In this paper, we are interested in ensuring that RMAB decision making is also fair to different arms while maximizing expected value. In the context of public health settings, this would ensure that different people and/or communities are fairly represented while making public health intervention decisions. To achieve this goal, we formally define the fairness constraints in RMAB and provide planning and learning methods to solve RMAB in a fair manner. We demonstrate key theoretical properties of fair RMAB and experimentally demonstrate that our proposed methods handle fairness constraints without sacrificing significantly on solution quality.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), inspired by Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), aggregate the message of nodes' neighbors and structure information to acquire expressive representations of nodes for node classification, graph classification, and link prediction. Previous studies have indicated that GNNs are vulnerable to Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs), which infer whether a node is in the training data of GNNs and leak the node's private information, like the patient's disease history. The implementation of previous MIAs takes advantage of the models' probability output, which is infeasible if GNNs only provide the prediction label (label-only) for the input. In this paper, we propose a label-only MIA against GNNs for node classification with the help of GNNs' flexible prediction mechanism, e.g., obtaining the prediction label of one node even when neighbors' information is unavailable. Our attacking method achieves around 60\% accuracy, precision, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) for most datasets and GNN models, some of which are competitive or even better than state-of-the-art probability-based MIAs implemented under our environment and settings. Additionally, we analyze the influence of the sampling method, model selection approach, and overfitting level on the attack performance of our label-only MIA. Both of those factors have an impact on the attack performance. Then, we consider scenarios where assumptions about the adversary's additional dataset (shadow dataset) and extra information about the target model are relaxed. Even in those scenarios, our label-only MIA achieves a better attack performance in most cases. Finally, we explore the effectiveness of possible defenses, including Dropout, Regularization, Normalization, and Jumping knowledge. None of those four defenses prevent our attack completely.