More than one hundred benchmarks have been developed to test the commonsense knowledge and commonsense reasoning abilities of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. However, these benchmarks are often flawed and many aspects of common sense remain untested. Consequently, we do not currently have any reliable way of measuring to what extent existing AI systems have achieved these abilities. This paper surveys the development and uses of AI commonsense benchmarks. We discuss the nature of common sense; the role of common sense in AI; the goals served by constructing commonsense benchmarks; and desirable features of commonsense benchmarks. We analyze the common flaws in benchmarks, and we argue that it is worthwhile to invest the work needed ensure that benchmark examples are consistently high quality. We survey the various methods of constructing commonsense benchmarks. We enumerate 139 commonsense benchmarks that have been developed: 102 text-based, 18 image-based, 12 video based, and 7 simulated physical environments. We discuss the gaps in the existing benchmarks and aspects of commonsense reasoning that are not addressed in any existing benchmark. We conclude with a number of recommendations for future development of commonsense AI benchmarks.

The traditional Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM) systems rely on the assumption of a static environment and fail to accurately estimate the system's location when dynamic objects are present in the background. While learning-based dynamic SLAM systems have difficulties in handling unknown moving objects, geometry-based methods have limited success in addressing the residual effects of unidentified dynamic objects on location estimation. To address these issues, we propose an anti-dynamics two-stage SLAM approach. Firstly, the potential motion regions of both prior and non-prior dynamic objects are extracted and pose estimates for dynamic discrimination are quickly obtained using optical flow tracking and model generation methods. Secondly, dynamic points in each frame are removed through dynamic judgment. For non-prior dynamic objects, we present a approach that uses super-pixel extraction and geometric clustering to determine the potential motion regions based on color and geometric information in the image. Evaluations on multiple low and high dynamic sequences in a public RGB-D dataset show that our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art dynamic SLAM methods.

The world of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing, with new discoveries and breakthroughs emerging at an unprecedented pace. For researchers and practitioners in the field, staying current and connected is vital, and attending top AI conferences in 2023 can offer unique opportunities for collaboration, inspiration, and professional growth. From NeurIPS to KDD, these conferences bring together leading experts in machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and more. Whether you're an established researcher, an aspiring practitioner, or just passionate about the latest AI developments, these conferences are a must-attend. So join the excitement and start planning your trip to one of these top AI conferences in 2023.

Agoda is an online travel booking platform for accommodations, flights, and more. We build and deploy cutting-edge technology that connects travelers with more than 2.5 million accommodations globally. Based in Asia and part of Booking Holdings, our 6,000 employees representing 90 nationalities foster a work environment rich in diversity, creativity, and collaboration. We innovate through a culture of experimentation and ownership, enhancing the ability for our customers to experience the world. In this role, you'll get to: Strategy: Conduct analyses to identify growth opportunities and prioritize investment areas in APAC for Strategic Partnerships team based on analytical insights, industry trends, and changing competitive landscape.

Three Australian-US scientific teams will set their sights on minimising the impact of health pandemics, harmful environmental emissions and drought using AI approaches. Minister for Industry and Science Ed Husic welcomed the announcement that the US National Science Foundation and Australia's national science agency CSIRO have awarded grants under their Collaboration Opportunities in Responsible and Ethical AI initiative. The grants total $1.8 million on the US side and $2.3 million on the Australian side, and include researchers from the University of NSW, RMIT University, University of Technology Sydney and the University of Melbourne. "These grants will support valuable research in ethical artificial intelligence, while strengthening relationships between US and Australian research organisations," Minister Husic said. "The NSF-CSIRO initiative will bring the best Australian and US researchers together from a range of disciplinary backgrounds, to share knowledge and learn from each other. "AI is an important driver of new scientific discoveries and economic prosperity, while also safeguarding national wellbeing.

Modern deep learning techniques have illustrated their excellent capabilities in many areas, but relies on large training data. Optimization-based meta-learning train a model on a variety tasks, such that it can solve new learning tasks using only a small number of training samples.However, these methods assumes that training and test dataare identically and independently distributed. To overcome such limitation, in this paper, we propose invariant meta learning for out-of-distribution tasks. Specifically, invariant meta learning find invariant optimal meta-initialization,and fast adapt to out-of-distribution tasks with regularization penalty. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed invariant meta learning on out-of-distribution few-shot tasks.

Open domain conversational agents can answer a broad range of targeted queries. However, the sequential nature of interaction with these systems makes knowledge exploration a lengthy task which burdens the user with asking a chain of well phrased questions. In this paper, we present a retrieval based system and associated dataset for predicting the next questions that the user might have. Such a system can proactively assist users in knowledge exploration leading to a more engaging dialog. The retrieval system is trained on a dataset which contains ~14K multi-turn information-seeking conversations with a valid follow-up question and a set of invalid candidates. The invalid candidates are generated to simulate various syntactic and semantic confounders such as paraphrases, partial entity match, irrelevant entity, and ASR errors. We use confounder specific techniques to simulate these negative examples on the OR-QuAC dataset and develop a dataset called the Follow-up Query Bank (FQ-Bank). Then, we train ranking models on FQ-Bank and present results comparing supervised and unsupervised approaches. The results suggest that we can retrieve the valid follow-ups by ranking them in higher positions compared to confounders, but further knowledge grounding can improve ranking performance.

Smart devices, such as smart speakers, are becoming ubiquitous, and users expect these devices to act in accordance with their preferences. In particular, since these devices gather and manage personal data, users expect them to adhere to their privacy preferences. However, the current approach of gathering these preferences consists in asking the users directly, which usually triggers automatic responses failing to capture their true preferences. In response, in this paper we present a collaborative filtering approach to predict user preferences as norms. These preference predictions can be readily adopted or can serve to assist users in determining their own preferences. Using a dataset of privacy preferences of smart assistant users, we test the accuracy of our predictions.

Empathy is an important characteristic to be considered when building a more intelligent and humanized dialogue agent. However, existing methods did not fully comprehend empathy as a complex process involving three aspects: cognition, affection and behavior. In this paper, we propose CAB, a novel framework that takes a comprehensive perspective of cognition, affection and behavior to generate empathetic responses. For cognition, we build paths between critical keywords in the dialogue by leveraging external knowledge. This is because keywords in a dialogue are the core of sentences. Building the logic relationship between keywords, which is overlooked by the majority of existing works, can improve the understanding of keywords and contextual logic, thus enhance the cognitive ability. For affection, we capture the emotional dependencies with dual latent variables that contain both interlocutors' emotions. The reason is that considering both interlocutors' emotions simultaneously helps to learn the emotional dependencies. For behavior, we use appropriate dialogue acts to guide the dialogue generation to enhance the empathy expression. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our multi-perspective model outperforms the state-of-the-art models in both automatic and manual evaluation.

Recent advances in the capacity of large language models to generate human-like text have resulted in their increased adoption in user-facing settings. In parallel, these improvements have prompted a heated discourse around the risks of societal harms they introduce, whether inadvertent or malicious. Several studies have explored these harms and called for their mitigation via development of safer, fairer models. Going beyond enumerating the risks of harms, this work provides a survey of practical methods for addressing potential threats and societal harms from language generation models. We draw on several prior works' taxonomies of language model risks to present a structured overview of strategies for detecting and ameliorating different kinds of risks/harms of language generators. Bridging diverse strands of research, this survey aims Figure 1: Overview of Intervention Strategies. A typical to serve as a practical guide for both LM researchers ML/NLP model development process involves data and practitioners, with explanations collection/curation, model training and design, inference, of different mitigation strategies' motivations, and finally application deployment.