Collaborating Authors


A change in the air


Atmospheric science is overwhelmingly white. These Black scientists ignited a change. Everything depended on finding the gigantic dust cloud. Seventeen years ago, a scientific crew set out on the Ron Brown , a gleaming U.S. research ship, in search of a plume of desert dust that had sheared off the Sahara and wafted over the Atlantic Ocean. Sailing from Barbados with day after day of clear sky, the crew was anxious about finding the dust storm. But that wasn't the only thing weighing on Vernon Morris, the atmospheric chemist who'd organized the cruise, the first of its kind run largely by Black and Hispanic scientists. Failure could make life complicated for the atmospheric sciences program Morris had recently co-founded at Howard University. And, he says, “They would have never entrusted the ship to a bunch of Puerto Ricans and Blacks again.” Finally, on the fifth morning, the crew awoke to an eclipse of dust. It settled on railings, instruments, and weather balloons. “We were just all giddy, the happiest scientists,” says Michelle Hawkins, a Howard graduate student at the time who now leads severe weather forecasts at the National Weather Service. The schedule was intense, as the crew launched weather balloons around the clock and took measurements in the ocean and at the surface to capture a picture of what turned out to be one of the largest Saharan plumes ever observed. And the cruise began a trend: The Aerosol and Ocean Science Expeditions (AEROSEs) have set out nearly every year since then, with the latest cruise defying the pandemic to sail in January. Although AEROSE cruises are still full of black and brown faces, most research cruises—indeed, most of the geosciences—are not. Nearly 90% of geoscience doctorate holders are white, and by Morris's count, there are no more than seven Black atmospheric scientists in tenured positions in the country's major academic departments. Many of the communities most at risk from climate-related extremes, such as heat waves or hurricanes, are those least represented in the science that explores those threats. “It's not only a Black man's challenge,” says Belay Demoz, an atmospheric physicist originally from Eritrea who is at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. “It's the nation's problem.” Amid this dire portrait, however, the Howard University Graduate Program in Atmospheric Science has been a notable success. From 2006 to 2018, the Howard program, one of AEROSE's sponsors, produced 17 Black doctorate holders in atmospheric science—more than half the country's total—and 30% of its Latina doctorate holders. Seventy-five percent of graduates came from low-income backgrounds. Nearly all hold scientific jobs and some are now carving out prominent positions in the country's premier climate science agencies, especially the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). “I feel like ‘successful’ is not strong enough,” Hawkins says. “It's been such a guiding light for all of us.” With the Biden administration promising to increase its support for historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) like Howard, including a potential new climate research lab based at one, this should be a time of hope and expansion for the Howard program. But its future is in doubt. For years, school leadership neglected the program, according to former faculty, and most of its founders, including Morris himself, have left. “I don't think Howard ever appreciated what they had on their hands,” says Marshall Shepherd, a Black atmospheric scientist at the University of Georgia, Athens, and former president of the American Meteorological Society (AMS). “They had a game-changing program.” As the geosciences seek to improve their diversity, Howard's success holds lessons for leaders and institutions. How can it be replicated? And can it even be sustained at Howard itself? MORRIS “BACKED into college,” as he puts it, attending Morehouse College, an HBCU in Atlanta, after deciding not to follow his father into the Air Force. But he felt adrift, far from his family in Washington, spending above his means to keep up with the rich kids. Thinking about dropping out, Morris ran into Henry McBay, a legendary Black chemist who offered to buy him books as long as he majored in chemistry and math. That led to a mentorship with John Hall, the pioneering Black atmospheric chemist who worked on ozone depletion. “I started doing work on chlorine nitrate chemistry and matrices,” Morris says. “I loved it.” In 1990 he became the first Black person to earn a Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology's earth science program. As a postdoc, he became intrigued by cosmic chemistry and the atmosphere of Venus. He wanted to get back to an HBCU, and he noticed that Howard had recently launched a small, NASA-funded Center for the Study of Terrestrial and Extraterrestrial Atmospheres. Morris wrangled an invite and sold himself as someone who could help focus the center's research and ensure its continuation—at the time, external NASA reviewers were questioning its lack of relevant expertise and threatening to claw back the grant. He was hired as deputy director in 1994. At the time, Morris was one of a few people of color who regularly appeared at national atmospheric science meetings. He and a handful of others would meet at a nearby hotel lobby bar to unwind. “Those meetings used to be superstressful, not seeing anyone who looks like you,” says Gregory Jenkins, a climatologist who now works at Pennsylvania State University, University Park. “You wanted to give a paper, check out other papers, and go back to the hotel room.” The stress did not stop there. In an essay this year in AGU Advances , Morris wrote of being harassed by police. “I have been that figure sitting on the curb with my hands bound behind my back,” he wrote. “I have been struck so hard with the butt of a police flashlight that the manufacturer label could be deciphered from the imprint on my chest days later.” Morris and his peers decided to create a community of Black atmospheric scientists at Howard by founding a new graduate program. Sonya Smith, an atmospheric engineer, came the year after Morris. Jenkins came, too, for a time. Everette Joseph, a code-savvy atmospheric scientist, joined soon after, as did Anthony Reynolds, a white physicist now at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. They started with a single course in atmospheric chemistry and gradually added more to build a case for a degree-granting program, ironing out their talking points over drinks and wings at a local bar. They won approval for the program from the Board of Trustees in 1997. None of them realized what they were getting into. The board had allocated little funding, so they would have to support the program by winning external grants. “We had to worry about building a program and building our careers at the same time,” says Joseph, who in 2019 became the first Black director of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, one of the country's leading climate labs. “We were stupid and brash not to realize the monumental nature of the challenge.” They also needed to recruit students. Some they found at Howard, including DaNa Carlis, a first-generation college student who initially wanted to become a doctor. He ran into Morris, who pitched the program and offered him a scholarship. “I was like, ‘What, you're going to pay me to go to school!’” says Carlis, who is now deputy director at NOAA's Global Systems Laboratory. Soon enough, he was doing research on ozone chemistry at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. Casting a wider net, the Howard faculty began to lure chemistry, physics, and math undergraduates at five HBCUs to Howard for NASA-sponsored summer programs. They also scouted graduate programs where students often stopped at a master's degree. “We recruited those students hard,” Morris says, by touting their connections to NASA and NOAA. They cobbled together money for a conference that attracted nearly 200 students of color to Washington, D.C., a gambit that gave them enough recruits to fill the program for 5 years. In 2001, the Howard team scored a huge victory, winning a $2.5 million annual grant from NOAA to establish one of four new scientific centers at minority-serving institutions. The NOAA grant, which also supports research and students elsewhere, enabled Howard to bring on several new faculty, including Demoz, an atmospheric physicist. Demoz belonged to the majority ethnic group in his home country of Eritrea, and it wasn't until he worked at Goddard, where the only other Black scientist in his division was Shepherd, that he became truly aware of U.S. racial dynamics. Training minority scientists became a cause equal to his research. “I'm Eritrean and I have a guilty feeling that I didn't fight for independence,” he says. “This is my independence.” Meanwhile, the first generation of Howard atmospheric science students was advancing toward doctorates. It was a tight group. One day, Joseph hauled them all into his office, ready to breathe fire because they had all gotten the same test question wrong in the same way. Then it became clear what happened: They had spent days together studying the problem in the wrong way. The tests required your best, says Isha M. Renta López, now a program analyst at NOAA's Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research. Once, Morris asked students to imagine a pyramid-shaped planet that doesn't rotate, then describe the chemical reactions in its atmosphere. “He would put in the craziest stuff,” López says. The professors pushed the students to present their research at scientific meetings, paying their way if they couldn't get a scholarship. “I remember our very first meeting, Vernon giving us the talk,” Hawkins says. “This is what you wear. This is how you introduce yourself. This is how you give a presentation.” The students, in turn, helped recruit their own successors. The program let the students be themselves and focus on their research without facing the tension and microaggressions that could come with being the sole Black student in a program, like passing comments about how “intelligent” or “well spoken” they were, or a critique that seemed excessively harsh for no reason. At Howard, Jenkins says, “They knew that it wasn't going to be easy, but one thing they didn't have to worry about were questions about whether they were qualified.” KNOWING FIELD RESEARCH would be critical to the students' success, the Howard faculty began to build opportunities. Many revolved around a small wooded campus owned by Howard in Beltsville, Maryland. Its haphazard assortment of squat red-brick buildings had previously hosted an observatory, animal experiments, and an argon beamline for particle physics research. Joseph and others saw huge potential in the site. At the time, Joseph says, simulations of the lower atmosphere tended to rely heavily on data from simple environments, like “pristine homogeneous fields in Kansas.” The Beltsville campus was right at the urban-rural divide, with countryside to the north and the sprawl of Washington, D.C., to the south, and the overlying air pushed and pulled from continental and ocean sources. Students took a lead role in launching weather balloons to study this complex environment. In 2006, they won a NASA grant to use their balloons to validate water vapor and ozone measurements from its newly launched Aura satellite—work that might have traditionally gone to a NASA center. “I'm very proud of that,” Demoz says. “Somebody took a risk and said let's do this.” Today, the Beltsville site is one of the few U.S. locations certified to make measurements of the upper atmosphere to the exacting standards of the World Meteorological Organization. It hosts a 30-meter tower for measuring winds, carbon dioxide, and air pollution; instruments for studying dust, soot, and similar particles; and sensors for measuring the precise amount of sunlight reaching the surface. Data gathered by Howard students help feed the numerical models used in National Weather Service forecasts. Many students interned at NOAA and NASA branches around the country, and some opportunities took them even farther afield. In the late 2000s, Jenkins flew students to West Africa for NASA-sponsored research on the birth of Atlantic hurricanes and their interaction with Saharan dust. His students flew on a DC-8 into tropical storms, running the radar instruments to capture these rare data. Follow-up flights chased dust storms across the Atlantic and studied ozone variability in the tropics. “The most important thing was to send students way outside their comfort zone,” Jenkins says. Perhaps nothing was more uncomfortable for some Howard students than spending weeks at sea, as the AEROSE cruises have done now for nearly 2 decades. “Being a girl from the South Side of Chicago, that was really intimidating,” Hawkins says. Mayra Oyola-Merced, now an atmospheric physicist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, remembers when they got a new lidar scanner on board for tracking dust in the air. Joseph asked whether she wanted to run it. “This was a $250,000 instrument,” she says, and she was just an undergraduate. But Joseph patiently explained the physics behind it, and that stuck with her. “Feeling someone trusted me and someone could see my potential to do things—it changed my complete perspective about going to graduate school.” FOR ALL ITS SUCCESS , the Howard program's future remains cloudy. For decades it was just one failed grant application away from collapse. The strain on faculty prompted many to leave, their vacant positions often going unfilled—an exodus that has many former faculty and alumni fearing for the program. Morris left early last year when Arizona State University offered him a chance to lead the school of science at its small liberal arts college. Jenkins, Joseph, and Demoz have also left, though Demoz still helps at Beltsville. “I'm the last one left,” Smith says. She and Terri Adams, a Howard sociologist who led the NOAA center on an interim basis, have been tasked with rebuilding the program, even though Smith's work has veered toward hypersonic weapons and Adams studies emergency management of climate disasters, not geoscience itself. For the university, Morris's departure served as a wake-up call. The university is now creating a department of earth, environment, and equity based on the program, giving it a lasting home that will include undergraduate students. (Previously the program was jointly administered by three departments, diluting its clout with the administration.) Charles Ichoku, a former senior NASA scientist originally from Nigeria, joined the faculty just before the pandemic and is pursuing grants for upgrades at Beltsville. Howard has hired a new director for its NOAA center and three new faculty in atmospheric sciences, two junior and one senior. Atmospheric sciences is essential to the university's future, says Bruce Jones, who joined Howard in 2018 as its first ever vice president for research and is charged with increasing its research ambitions. “While we acknowledge we lost some of the great minds in the field, the recent investment is just the beginning of the rebirth of the program,” he says. The recommitment is good to see, says Jack Kaye, associate director of NASA's earth science division, who is white. “Howard is special place in American education,” he says. “Having a program focused on atmospheric sciences is important to the community. It's important to the nation.” Whatever the future of the program, its mark will be lasting. Morris, his colleagues, and former students have a tradition of getting together at the AMS annual meeting. Their once-informal gathering—online during the pandemic but scheduled to resume next year—is now one of the meeting's primary social events, attended by a diverse crowd that includes agency leaders and senior scientists. Called the “Colour of Weather,” it regularly fills a ballroom. Many former Howard students now occupy leadership positions, especially at NOAA, which remains the primary sponsor of the Howard graduate program. “They're smart, pushing, building communities—that's a pay back, there's no dollar sign on that,” Jenkins says. And they continue to try to make atmospheric science more welcoming. In 2014, Hawkins and Carlis started a diversity working group at NOAA, which hosts monthly seminars and encourages minority scientists scattered across the agency's many divisions to connect and support each other. They have also advised the agency to implement steps like evaluating supervisors on their support for inclusion and increasing the diversity of hiring panels. “We can move the needle,” Hawkins says. “We can provide equity where we can.” One disappointment, though, is that few Howard graduates have ended up in academia. Universities hire faculty from the same few elite academic programs, which continue to churn out predominately white graduates—and when few faculty are people of color, potential students are put off, Marshall says. “Students need to see professors of color,” he says. “We just don't see enough people at the university level, teaching,” Jenkins adds. “That's still the struggle.” In the wake of the murder of George Floyd in May 2020, Morris and several peers published a letter online urging geoscientists to end their silence on the racism in their field. “In place of police brutality, careers are killed through forced attrition and under-investment,” they wrote. New Black professors are subject to biased reviews and limited mentorship. “The time has passed for predominantly white scientific organizations to post photos of happy, multiracial groups on their websites in place of actually diversifying their leadership and members,” they wrote. Since that letter, professional organizations have taken some real steps, Morris says. At the AMS meeting in January, the presidential forum focused on building a culture of antiracism. (Morris was among the speakers.) AMS and the American Geophysical Union have created new senior positions focused on improving diversity, featured talks on diversity more prominently at meetings, and gathered more data about the race and ethnicity of members. But academic programs have been much slower to react, Morris adds. Overall, he sees little evidence that the toxic environment often faced by students and faculty of color has changed. New hires still face an evaluation and tenure process that reinforces white privilege, he says. “Many of the current cluster hires are like experiments that introduce new fish into a polluted pond to see if they survive,” he says. So much more can be done, Morris says. Investing more federal research dollars in HBCUs and minority-serving institutions is an obvious start. “A lot of HBCU programs are funded at levels that aren't going to enable their success,” Morris says. But it's not just money that made the Howard program so successful. It had federal agencies invested in its success and benefited from their material support in the form of adjunct professors and lab space. It recruited students from places other programs hadn't looked. And most of all, it had a cohort of young Black professors hungry for the program to succeed—who saw its success as their own. Jamese Sims, an alumnus who's now NOAA's senior science adviser for artificial intelligence, recalls that passion. Howard's faculty asked how they could speak up for those without a voice, she says. They asked how their scientific expertise could make this a better country for all. “Because, if our goal is ultimately to save lives and property,” she says, “that includes everyone.”

Colonoscopy Polyp Detection and Classification: Dataset Creation and Comparative Evaluations Artificial Intelligence

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common types of cancer with a high mortality rate. Colonoscopy is the preferred procedure for CRC screening and has proven to be effective in reducing CRC mortality. Thus, a reliable computer-aided polyp detection and classification system can significantly increase the effectiveness of colonoscopy. In this paper, we create an endoscopic dataset collected from various sources and annotate the ground truth of polyp location and classification results with the help of experienced gastroenterologists. The dataset can serve as a benchmark platform to train and evaluate the machine learning models for polyp classification. We have also compared the performance of eight state-of-the-art deep learning-based object detection models. The results demonstrate that deep CNN models are promising in CRC screening. This work can serve as a baseline for future research in polyp detection and classification.

3 Kansas police officers injured by modified shotgun inside vacant home: cops

FOX News

Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Authorities in Wichita, Kan., said Sunday that they are investigating a shooting that injured three police officers this weekend and working to determine if the shotgun was rigged to the door. A "modified, loaded shotgun" discharged as the officers entered a home in the city on Saturday, according to a release by Wichita Police Department spokesman Officer Trevor Macy. "Apparently there were several modifications made to this one," Macy told The Wichita Eagle.

Quantum cost: The pitfalls of simplifying politics


Quantum computers offer great promise for cryptography and optimization problems. ZDNet explores what quantum computers will and won't be able to do, and the challenges we still face. In 1936, some 2.4 million members of the Literary Digest magazine's mailing list responded to its publisher by mail, in the broadest presidential candidates' opinion poll conducted in the United States to that time. By a margin of 57 to 43, those readers reported they favored the Republican governor of Kansas, Alf Landon, over the incumbent Democrat, Franklin D. Roosevelt. The week after the election, the magazine's cover announced in bold, black letters the message, "Is Our Face Red!" Also: Could quantum computers fix political polls? The following January, Oxford University's Public Opinion Quarterly published an essay that examined how a seemingly much smaller survey of only 50,000 participants, conducted by a fellow named George Gallup, yielded a far more accurate result than did Literary Digest. Gallup's poll was "scientific," and Oxford wanted to explain what that meant, and why opinion polling deserved that lofty moniker. For the first time, the Oxford publication explained a concept called selection bias. Specifically, if you don't ask people for enough facts about themselves, you never attain the information you need to estimate whether the people around them think and act in similar ways.

Council Post: Artificial Intelligence: Leadership's Friend Or Foe?


Since the beginning of time, leadership has been predominantly exerted through physical strength -- the stronger the individual physically, the higher up in the leadership ranks of the community they would be. In nature, animals follow suit. The physically strongest animal eventually becomes the leader of the pack. However, through the development of the human race over thousands of years, together with the development of human language as we know it today, leadership has transitioned from brutal physical strength toward cognitive skills. As Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Michael Wade and Jennifer Jordan explain (registration required), primary attention was placed on a leader's intelligence in problem-solving, rather than physical strength. In a modern context, this refers to a leader's ability to analyze data for decision-making, ensuring team performance and productivity and ensuring effective production and service delivery processes (Central Christian College of Kansas [CCCK]).

NSF funds K-State research on artificial intelligence-based cyber-physical systems


MANHATTAN, Kan. (WIBW) - The National Science Foundation is funding a K-State professor's research on artificial intelligence-based cyber-physical systems. Kansas State University says Pavithra Prabhakar, an associate professor and Peggy and Gary Edwards chair in engineering in its computer science department, has been awarded $450,000 from the National Science Foundation to work on artificial intelligence-based controllers in the 3-year long project titled, "Scalable Formal Verification of ANN Controlled Cyber-Physical Systems." According to K-State, artificial intelligence-based controllers are increasingly used for modern-day cyber-physical and autonomous systems like driverless cars. It said these systems have been called on to perform sophisticated functions and operate in dynamic environments. It said the use of such controllers in driverless cars is highly safety-critical, where the vehicle is expected to not only stay in the right lane but avoid accidents with other cars and pedestrians crossing roadways under different lighting conditions.

Trust levels in AI predicted by people's relationship style


A University of Kansas interdisciplinary team led by relationship psychologist Omri Gillath has published a new paper in the journal Computers in Human Behavior showing people's trust in artificial intelligence (AI) is tied to their relationship or attachment style. The research indicates for the first time that people who are anxious about their relationships with humans tend to have less trust in AI as well. Importantly, the research also suggests trust in artificial intelligence can be increased by reminding people of their secure relationships with other humans. Grand View Research estimated the global artificial-intelligence market at $39.9 billion in 2019, projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate of 42.2% from 2020 to 2027. However, lack of trust remains a key obstacle to adopting new artificial intelligence technologies.

Do You Trust Artificial Intelligence?


Artificial intelligence (AI) is everywhere. In a typical day, people likely use AI multiple times without even knowing it: Alexa and Siri, Google Maps, Uber and Lyft, autopilot on commercial flights, spam filters, and smart email categorization (so anyone using Gmail, Yahoo, or Office 365/outlook), mobile check deposits, plagiarism checkers, online searches, personalized recommendations, Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest are all examples of AI. But what happens when people are being introduced to a new AI technology? How likely are they to trust the new technology? With an interdisciplinary team of researchers from the University of Kansas, we set to find out.

New Insight Into Lack of Trust for Artificial Intelligence


Recent research is providing new insight into what determines individuals' level of trust in artificial intelligence (AI). A team from the University of Kansas, which was led by relationship psychologist Omri Gillath, detailed how that relationship is impacted by the individuals' real-life relationship or attachment style.

Do your close relationships dictate your trust in Siri?


How likely you are to trust a self-driving car or advice from Siri? A University of Kansas interdisciplinary team led by relationship psychologist Omri Gillath has published a new paper in the journal Computers in Human Behavior showing people's trust in artificial intelligence (AI) is tied to their relationship or attachment style. The research indicates for the first time that people who are anxious about their relationships with humans tend to have less trust in AI as well. Importantly, the research also suggests trust in artificial intelligence can be increased by reminding people of their secure relationships with other humans. Grand View Research estimated the global artificial-intelligence market at $39.9 billion in 2019, projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate of 42.2% from 2020 to 2027.