This conference is analogous to the ancient texts but little procedural consultation of philosophers and cognitive information), we had to rely on the This report is a review of the First psychologists by computer scientists pandits to whom the oral tradition had National Conference on Knowledge in the beginnings of AI. been passed. Representation and Inference in Western psychology and philosophy is The conference was inspired by Sri Sanskrit, Bangalore, India, 20 through quite different from the Indo-Aryan Paramananda Bharathi Swamiji and 22 December, 1986 The conference tradition: the former has its basis in was organized by Dr. H. N. Mahabala was inspired by an article that Aristotelian logic and the scientific (president, Computer Society of India; appeared in the Spring 1985 issue of method, whereas the latter is also chairman, Indian Institute of AI Magazine--"Knowledge based on introspection and internal Technology) and others. The conference Representation in Sanskrit and experience Nevertheless, both these was attended by the vice-chairman Artificial Intelligence." Virtually text.The purpose of AI in this context every institute of science, mathematics is to derive a "method" for natural language and engineering was represented. A working group has been created to was implicit; it was not the focus.

Even though sues raised during the workshop sponsored emerged during the workshop. In many situations, users are not sufficiently defined or Seattle, Washington. Issues include the need guidance and counseling in order understood to be amenable to traditional definition of coupled systems, motivations to solve the problem at hand. In control system--one that combines such situations, users often need help techniques from artificial intelligence in determining which specific algorithm (AI), control theory, and operations or technique should be research (Kowalik et al. 1986). In other situations, traditional techniques to perform the need is more basic--for guidance in many routine tasks, sophisticated determining whether the problem at hand can be solved and, if so, whether techniques are needed to handle many the resources that can be brought to of the humanlike functions.

The first step in the development of an expert system is the extraction and characterization of the knowledge and skills of an expert. This step is widely regarded as the major bottleneck in the system development process. To assist knowledge engineers and others who might be interested in the development of an expert system, I offer (1) a working classification of methods for extracting an expert's knowledge, (2) some ideas about the types of data that the methods yield, and (3) a set of criteria by which the methods can be compared relative to the needs of the system developer. The discussion highlights certain issues, including the contrast between the empirical approach taken by experimental psychologists and the formalism-oriented approach that is generally taken by cognitive scientists.

This report makes a case for the need to examine the methodological foundations of AI. Many aspects of AI have not yet developed to a point of general agreement. The goals of AI work, the methods for achieving these goals, the presentation of results, and the assessment of claims are highly contentious issues. All aspects of AI methodology are subject to debate. The Workshop on Foundations of AI was conceived as a forum in which such a debate could proceed. This report presents the rationale behind the event, the details of the program, and finally some afterthoughts.

In order for next-generation expert systems to demonstrate the performance, robustness, flexibility, and learning ability of human experts, they will have to be based on cognitive models of expert human reasoning and learning. We call such next-generation systems cognitive expert systems. Research at the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at the University of Connecticut is directed toward understanding the principles underlying cognitive expert systems and developing computer programs embodying those principles. The Causal Model Acquisition System (CMACS) learns causal models of physical mechanisms by understanding real-world natural language explanations of those mechanisms. The going Concern Expert ( GCX) uses business and environmental knowledge to assess whether a company will remain in business for at least the following year. The Business Information System (BIS) acquires business and environmental knowledge from in-depth reading of real-world news stories. These systems are based on theories of expert human reasoning and learning, and thus represent steps toward next-generation cognitive expert systems.

In IJCAI-87, Proc. Tenth Intl. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Milan, Italy: Morgan Kaufmann, 1987, Vol. 1, pp. 264-270.

Chapman and Hall. See also: Influence diagrams for Bayesian decision analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 40, Issue 3, 15 June 1989, Pages 363–376 (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0377221789904293). Bayesian Decision Analysis: Principles and Practice, Cambridge University Press, 2010 (https://books.google.com/books/about/Bayesian_Decision_Analysis.html?id=O1lXnQAACAAJ).

This article provides a discussion of factory design and an artificial intelligence (AI) approach to this problem. Major issues covered include knowledge acquisition and representation, design methodology, system architecture, and communication. The facilities design expert systems (FADES developed by the author is presented and described to illustrate issues in factory design.

To be useful in practice, a factory production schedule must reflect the influence of a large and conflicting set of requirements, objectives and preferences. Human schedulers are typically overburdened by the complexity of this task, and conventional computer-based scheduling systems consider only a small fraction of the relevent knowledge. This article describes research aimed at providing a framework in which all relevant scheduling knowledge can be given consideration during schedule generation and revision. Factory scheduling is cast as a complex constraint-directed activity, driven by a rich symbolic model of the factory environment in which various influencing factors are formalized as constraints. A variety of constraint-directed inference techniques are defined with respect to this model to provide a basis for intelligently compromising among conflicting concerns. Two knowledge-based factory scheduling systems that implement aspects of this approach are described.

This is the second part of a two-part article describing AI work at the NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC). Research and applications work in AI is being conducted by several groups at JSC. These are primarily independent groups that interact with each other on an informal basis. In the Research and Engineering Directorate, these groups include (1) the Artificial Intelligence and Information Sciences Office, (2) the Simulation and Avionics Integration Division, (3) the Avionics Systems Division, and (4) the Tracking and Communications Division. In the Space Operations Directorate, these groups include (1) the Mission Planning and Analysis Division (MPAD) - Technology Development and Applications Branch, (2) the Spacecraft Software Division, and (3) the Systems Division - Systems Support Section. This second part of the article describes the AI work in the Space Operations Directorate. The first part of the article, published in the last week of AI Magazine, (7:1, Summer 1986) described the AI work in the Research and Engineering Directorate.