Current state-of-the-art planners solve problems, easy and hard alike, by search, expanding hundreds or thousands of nodes. Yet, given the ability of people to solve easy problems and to explain their solutions, it seems that an essential inferential component may be missing. The reasons expressed by people for selecting  actions appear to be related to causal chains: sequences of causal links a i → p i + 1 , i = 0, ..., n – 1, such that a 0 is applicable in the current state, p i is a precondition of action a i , and p n is a goal. Some of these causal chains or paths appear to be good, some bad, others appear to be impossible. In this work, we focus on such paths and develop three techniques for performing inference over them  from which a  path-based planner is obtained. We define the conditions under which a path is consistent, provide an heuristic estimate of the cost of achieving the goal along a consistent path, and introduce a planning algorithm that uses paths as decomposition backbones. The resulting planner, called C3, is not complete and does not perform as well as recent planners that carry extensive but extremely efficient searches such as LAMA, but is competitive with FF and in particular, with FF running in EHC mode which yields very focused but incomplete searches, and thus provides, a more apt comparison. Moreover, many domains are solved backtrack-free, with no search at all, suggesting that planning with paths may be a meaningful idea both cognitively and computationally.

Probabilistic Roadmaps (PRM) are a commonly used class of algorithms for robot navigation tasks where obstacles are present in the environment. We examine the situation where the obstacle positions are not precisely known. A subset of the edges in the PRM graph may possibly intersect the obstacles, and as the robot traverses the graph it can make noisy observations of these uncertain edges to determine if it can traverse them or not. The problem is to traverse the graph from an initial vertex to a goal without taking a blocked edge, and to do this optimally the robot needs to consider the observations it can make as well as the structure of the graph. In this paper we show how this problem can be represented as a POMDP. We show that while too large to be solved with exact methods, approximate point based methods can provide a good quality solution. While feasible for smaller examples, this approach isn't scalable. By exploiting the structure in the belief space, we can construct an approximate belief-space MDP that can be solved efficiently using recent techniques in MDP planning. We then demonstrate that this gives near optimal results in most cases while achieving an order of magnitude speed-up in policy generation time.

Current heuristic estimators for classical domain-independent planning are usually based on one of four ideas: delete relaxations , critical paths , abstractions , and, most recently, landmarks . Previously, these different ideas for deriving heuristic functions were largely unconnected. We prove that admissible heuristics based on these ideas are in fact very closely related. Exploiting this relationship, we introduce a new admissible heuristic called the landmark cut heuristic , which compares favourably with the state of the art in terms of heuristic accuracy and overall performance.

This paper is concerned with local search methods to solve job shop scheduling problems with uncertain durations modelled as fuzzy numbers. Based on a neighbourhood structure from the literature, a reduced set of moves and the consequent structure are defined. Theoretical results show that the proposed neighbourhood contains all the improving solutions from the original neighbourhood and provide a sufficient condition for optimality. Additionally, a makespan lower bound is proposed which can be used to discard neighbours. Experimental results illustrate the good performance of both proposals, which considerably reduce the computational load of the local search, as well as a synergy effect when they are simultaneously used.

A planning problem is k- dependent if each action has at most k pre-conditions on variables unaffected by the action. This concept is well-founded since k is a constant for all but a few of the standard planning domains, and is known to have implications for tractability. In this paper, we present several new complexity results for P ( k ), the class of k- dependent planning problems with binary variables and polytree causal graphs. The problem of plan generation for P ( k ) is equivalent to determining how many times each variable can change. Using this fact, we present a polytime plan generation algorithm for P (2) and P (3). For constant k > 3, we introduce and use the notion of a cover to find conditions under which plan generation for P ( k ) is polynomial.

Planning systems for real-world applications need the ability to handle concurrency and numeric fluents. Nevertheless, the predominant approach to cope with concurrency followed by the most successful participants in the latest International Planning Competitions (IPC) is still to find a sequential plan that is rescheduled in a post-processing step. We present Temporal Fast Downward (TFD), a planning system for temporal problems that is capable of finding low-makespan plans by performing a heuristic search in a temporal search space. We show how the context-enhanced additive heuristic can be successfully used for temporal planning and how it can be extended to numeric fluents. TFD often produces plans of high quality and, evaluated according to the rating scheme of the last IPC, outperforms all state-of-the-art temporal planning systems.

In this paper we extend dynamic controllability of temporally-flexible plans to temporally-flexible reactive programs.  We consider three reactive programming language constructs whose behavior depends on runtime observations; conditional execution, iteration, and exception handling. Temporally-flexible reactive programs are distinguished from temporally-flexible plans in that program execution is conditioned on the runtime state of the world.  In addition, exceptions are thrown and caught at runtime in response to violated timing constraints, and handled exceptions are considered successful program executions.  Dynamic controllability corresponds to a guarantee that a program will execute to completion, despite runtime constraint violations and uncertainty in runtime state.  An algorithm is developed which frames the dynamic controllability problem as an AND/OR search tree over possible program executions.  A key advantage of this approach is the ability to enumerate only a subset of possible program executions that guarantees dynamic controllability, framed as an AND/OR solution subtree.

Solving real-world problems using symbolic planning often requires a simplified formulation of the original problem, since certain subproblems cannot be represented at all or only in a way leading to inefficiency. For example, manipulation planning may appear as a subproblem in a robotic planning context or a packing problem can be part of a logistics task. In this paper we propose an extension of PDDL for specifying semantic attachments. This allows the evaluation of grounded predicates as well as the change of fluents by externally specified functions. Furthermore, we describe a general schema of integrating semantic attachments into a forward-chaining planner and report on our experience of adding this extension to the planners FF and Temporal Fast Downward. Finally, we present some preliminary experiments using semantic attachments.

Systems subject to (continuous) physical effects and controlled by (discrete) digital equipments, are today very common. Thus, many realistic domains where planning is required are represented by hybrid systems , i.e., systems containing both discrete and continuous values, with possibly a nonlinear continuous dynamics. The PDDL+ language allows one to model these domains, however the current tools can generally handle only planning problems on (possibly hybrid) systems with linear dynamics. Therefore, universal planning applied to hybrid systems and, in general, to non-linear systems is completely out of scope for such tools. In this paper, we propose the use of explicit model checking-based techniques to solve universal planning problems on such hardly-approachable domains.

In this paper we look at the problem of composing services that export their behavior in terms of a transition system, characterizing the choices of actions given to a client at each point in time. The composition consists of synthesizing an orchestrator that coordinates the available services so as to mimic the desired target service asked by the client. Specifically, in this paper we study the "conformant form" of the problem, where available services are partially controllable and partially observable, and hence, the orchestrator has to make its decisions exploiting the observations made so far only. We give a sound and complete procedure to synthesize the orchestrator in such case, and characterize the computational complexity of the problem. The procedure is based on working with belief (or knowledge) states, a standard technique to tackle conformant planning. Moreover we show that, although in general unavoidable, the powerset construction at the base of the belief state approach can be delegated to the symbolic manipulations of the game-structure model checking tool (TLV), which can be used to efficiently implement the orchestrator synthesis procedure.