In recent years, the summarisation and decomposition of social networks has become increasingly popular, from community finding to role equivalence. However, these approaches concentrate on one type of model only. Generalised block modelling decomposes a network into independent, interpretable, labeled blocks, where the block labels summarise the relationship between two sets of users. Existing algorithms for fitting generalised block models do not scale beyond networks of 100 vertices. In this paper, we introduce two new algorithms, one based on genetic algorithms and the other on simulated annealing, that is at least two orders of magnitude faster than existing algorithms and obtaining similar accuracy. Using synthetic and real datasets, we demonstrate their efficiency and accuracy and show how generalised block modelling and our new approaches enable tractable network summarisation and modelling of medium sized networks.

Humans have developed jurisprudence as a mechanism to solve conflictive situations by using past experiences. Following this principle, we propose an approach to enhance a multi-agent system by adding an authority which is able to generate new regulations whenever conflicts arise. Regulations are generated by learning from previous similar situations, using a machine learning technique (based on Case-Based Reasoning) that solves new problems using previous experiences. This approach requires: to be able to gather and evaluate experiences; and to be described in such a way that similar social situations require similar regulations. As a scenario to evaluate our proposal, we use a simplified version of a traffic scenario, where agents are traveling cars. Our goals are to avoid collisions between cars and to avoid heavy traffic. These situations, when happen, lead to the synthesis of new regulations. At each simulation step, applicable regulations are evaluated in terms of their effectiveness and necessity. Overtime the system generates a set of regulations that, if followed, improve system performance (i.e. goal achievement).

To encompass them, several extensions of Dung's argumentation framework (AF) [Dung, This extended research abstract describes an 1995] have been proposed, but the most general, as shown in argumentation-based approach to modelling articulated [Baroni et al., 2011], is the Argumentation Framework with decision making contexts. The approach Recursive Attacks (AF RA) formalism [Baroni et al., 2009b; encompasses a variety of argument and attack 2011]. In[Baroni et al., 2009a; 2010b] we showed how to organise schemes aimed at representing basic knowledge arguments that are instances of argument schemes in and reasoning patterns for decision support.

Plan recognition is the problem of inferring the goals and plans of an agent from partial observations of her behavior. Recently, it has been shown that the problem can be formulated and solved using planners, reducing plan recognition to plan generation. In this work, we extend this model-based approach to plan recognition to the POMDP setting, where actions are stochastic and states are partially observable. The task is to infer a probability distribution over the possible goals of an agent whose behavior results from a POMDP model. The POMDP model is shared between agent and observer except for the true goal of the agent that is hidden to the observer. The observations are action sequences O that may contain gaps as some or even most of the actions done by the agent may not be observed. We show that the posterior goal distribution P ( G | O ) can be computed from the value function V G ( b ) over beliefs b  generated by the POMDP planner for each possible goal G. Some extensions of the basic framework are discussed, and a number of experiments are reported.

The Semantic Web aims to offer an interoperable environment that will allow users to safely delegate complex actions to intelligent agents. Much work has been done for agents' interoperability; especially in the areas of ontology-based metadata and rule-based reasoning. Nevertheless, the SW proof layer has been neglected so far, although it is vital for agents and humans to understand how a result came about, in order to increase the trust in the interchanged information. This paper focuses on the implementation of third party SW reasoning and proofing services wrapped as agents in a multi-agent framework. This way, agents can exchange and justify their arguments without the need to conform to a common rule paradigm. Via external reasoning and proofing services, the receiving agent can grasp the semantics of the received rule set and check the validity of the inferred results.

A usual strategy to select the final answer in factoid Question-Answering (QA) relies on redundancy. A score is given to each candidate answer as a function of its frequency of occurrence, and the final answer is selected from the set of candidates sorted in decreasing order of score. For that purpose, systems often try to group together semantically equivalent answers. However, they hold several other semantic relations, such as inclusion, which are not considered, and candidates are mostly seen independently, as competitors. Our hypothesis is that not just equivalence, but other relations between candidate answers have impact on the performance of a redundancy-based QA system. In this paper, we describe experimental studies to back up this hypothesis. Our findings show that, with relatively simple techniques to recognize relations, systems' accuracy can be improved for answers of categories Number, Date and Entity.

Finally, explore possible methods for decision making in general, have received a lot uses of combinatorial aggregation in sequential voting, of attention in the AI community in recent years. The reasons and discuss theoretical generalisations to more complex logical for this focus are clear: SCT provides tools for the analysis of languages and practical applications. Particularly close to the interests of AI is the to study binary aggregation procedures, inspired by research problem of social choice in combinatorial domains (Chevaleyre in AI. As long as we do not know the intended application of et al., 2008), where the space of alternatives the individuals the model, there is no appropriate set of axioms to concentrate have to choose from has a combinatorial structure. Instead, we prove characterisation results concerning one Definition 1.

We propose a logical framework to represent and reason about agent interactions in normative systems. Our starting point is a dynamic logic of propositional assignments whose satisfiability problem is PSPACE-complete. We show that it embeds Coalition Logic of Propositional Control CL-PC and that various notions of ability and capability can be captured in it. We illustrate it on a water resource management case study. Finally, we show how the logic can be easily extended in order to represent constitutive rules which are also an essential component of the modelling of social reality.

In this paper we take a step towards using Argumentation in Social Networksand introduce Social Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, an extension of Dung'sAbstract Argumentation Frameworks that incorporates social voting.We propose a class of semantics for these new Social Abstract Argumentation Frameworks and prove some important non-trivial properties which are crucialfor their applicability in Social Networks.

Gjerstad and Dickhaut, 1998; Nicolaisen et al., 2001] and a market selection strategy which is mainly based on the history This paper describes the strategies used by of the trader's profit made with each specialist. AstonCAT-Plus, the post-tournament version of A CAT game lasts a number of days (500 days in CATthe specialist designed for the TAC Market Design 2010). Each day consists of a number of trading rounds, Tournament 2010. It details how AstonCATwhich each lasts for a known constant length of time. The Plus accepts shouts, clears market, sets transaction daily evaluation of the specialists is based on three metrics: prices and charges fees. Through empirical evaluation, (1) market share, which is the percentage of the total traders' we show that AstonCAT-Plus not only outperforms population registered in the market; (2) profit share, which is AstonCAT (tournament version) significantly the ratio of the daily profit a specialist obtains to the profit of but also achieves the second best overall all specialists and (3) transaction success rate (TSR), which score against some top entrants of the competition.