A counterexample, inconsistency tolerant query answering methods, known now as the Yale Shooting Scenario, showed and mechanisms supporting update operations that early attempts to make the idea of commonsense expressed over the ontology.

In this paper we introduce an abstract theory of normative reasoning, whose central notion is the generation of obligations, permissions and institutional facts from conditional norms. We present various semantics and their proof systems. The theory can be used to classify and compare new candidates for standards of normative reasoning, and to explore more elaborate forms of normative reasoning than studied thus far.

We are witnessing an explosion of available data from the Web, government authorities, scientific databases, sensors and more. Such datasets could benefit from the introduction of rule sets encoding commonly accepted rules or facts, application- or domain-specific rules, commonsense knowledge etc. This raises the question of whether, how, and to what extent knowledge representation methods are capable of handling the vast amounts of data for these applications. In this paper, we consider nonmonotonic reasoning, which has traditionally focused on rich knowledge structures. In particular, we consider defeasible logic, and analyze how parallelization, using the MapReduce framework, can be used to reason with defeasible rules over huge data sets. Our experimental results demonstrate that defeasible reasoning with billions of data is performant, and has the potential to scale to trillions of facts.

Datalog ∃ is the extension of Datalog, allowing existentially quantified variables in rule heads. This language is highly expressive and enables easy and powerful knowledge-modeling, but the presence of existentially quantified variables makes reasoning over Datalog^E undecidable, in the general case. The results in this paper enable powerful, yet decidable and efficient reasoning (query answering) on top of Datalog ∃ programs. On the theoretical side, we define the class of parsimonious Datalog ∃ programs, and show that it allows of decidable and efficiently-computable reasoning. Unfortunately, we can demonstrate that recognizing parsimony is undecidable. However, we single out Shy, an easily recognizable fragment of parsimonious programs, that significantly extends both Datalog and Linear-Datalog ∃ , while preserving the same (data and combined) complexity of query answering over Datalog, although the addition of existential quantifiers. On the practical side, we implement a bottom-up evaluation strategy for Shy programs inside the DLV system, enhancing the computation by a number of optimization techniques to result in DLV ∃ — a powerful system for answering conjunctive queries over Shy programs, which is profitably applicable to ontology-based query answering. Moreover, we carry out an experimental analysis, comparing DLV ∃ against a number of state-of-the-art systems for ontology-based query answering. The results confirm the effectiveness of DLV ∃ , which outperforms all other systems in the benchmark domain.

In this paper, we study the problem of exchanging knowledge between a source and a target knowledge base (KB), connected through mappings. Differently from the traditional database exchange setting, which considers only the exchange of data, we are interested in exchanging implicit knowledge. As representation formalism we use Description Logics (DLs), thus assuming that the source and target KBs are given as a DL TBox+ABox, while the mappings have the form of DL TBox assertions. We study the problem of translating the knowledge in the source KB according to these mappings. We define a general framework of KB exchange, and address the problems of representing implicit source information in the target, and of computing different kinds of solutions, i.e., target KBs with specified properties, given a source KB and a mapping. We develop first results and study the complexity of KB exchange for DL-Lite_RDFS, a DL corresponding to the FOL fragment of RDFS, and for DL-Lite_R.

Possibilistic logic is a well-known logic for reasoning under uncertainty, which is based on the idea that the epistemic state of an agent can be modeled by assigning to each possible world a degree of possibility, taken from a totally ordered, but essentially qualitative scale. Recently, a generalization has been proposed that extends possibilistic logic to a meta-epistemic logic, endowing it with the capability of reasoning about epistemic states, rather than merely constraining them. In this paper, we further develop this generalized possibilistic logic (GPL). We introduce an axiomatization showing that GPL is a fragment of a graded version of the modal logic KD, and we prove soundness and completeness w.r.t. a semantics in terms of possibility distributions. Next, we reveal a close link between the well-known stable model semantics for logic programming and the notion of minimally specific models in GPL. More generally, we analyze the relationship between the equilibrium logic of Pearce and GPL, showing that GPL can essentially be seen as a generalization of equilibrium logic, although its notion of minimal specificity is slightly more demanding than the notion of minimality underlying equilibrium logic.

Abstraction has been used in search and planning from the very beginning of AI. Many different methods and formalisms for abstraction have been proposed in the literature but they have been designed from various points of view and with varying purposes. Hence, these methods have been notoriously difficult to analyse and compare in a structured way. In order to improve upon this situation, we present a coherent and flexible framework for modelling abstraction (and abstraction-like) methods based on transformations on labelled graphs. Transformations can have certain method properties that are inherent in the abstraction methods and describe their fundamental modelling characteristics, and they can have certain instance properties that describe algorithmic and computational characteristics of problem instances. The usefulness of the framework is demonstrated by applying it to problems in both search and planning. First, we show that we can capture many search abstraction concepts (such as avoidance of backtracking between levels) and that we can put them into a broader context. We further model five different abstraction concepts from the planning literature. Analysing what method properties they have highlights their fundamental differences and similarities. Finally, we prove that method properties sometimes imply instance properties. Taking also those instance properties into account reveals important information about computational aspects of the five methods.

In this paper, we propose a semantic forgetting for arbitrary logic programs(or propositional theories) under answer set semantics,called HT-forgetting. The HT-forgetting preserves strong equivalence in the sense that strongly equivalent logic programs will remain strongly equivalent after forgetting the same set of atoms. The result of an HT-forgetting is always expressible by a logic program, and in particular, the result of an HT-forgetting in a Horn program is expressible in a Horn program; and a representation theorem shows that HT-forgetting can be precisely characterized by Zhang-Zhou's four forgetting postulates under the logic of here-and-there. We also reveal underlying connections between HT-forgetting and classical forgetting, and provide complexity results for decision problems.

We deal with the problem of how to extend a preference relation over a set X of "objects" to the set of all subsets of X. This problem has been carried out in the tradition of the literature on extending an order on a set to its power set with the objective to analyze the axiomatic structure of families of rankings over subsets. In particular, most of these approaches make use of axioms aimed to prevent any kind of interaction among the objects in X . In this paper, we apply coalitional games to study the problem of extending preferences over a finite set X to its power set 2 X . A coalitional game can be seen as a numerical representation of a preference extension on 2 X . . We focus on a particular class of extensions on 2 X . such that the ranking induced by the Shapley value of each coalitional game representing an extension in this class, coincides with the original preference on X . Some properties of Shapley extensions are discussed, with the objective to justify and contextualize the application of Shapley extensions to the problem of ranking sets of possibly interacting objects.We deal with the problem of how to extend a preference relation over a set X of "objects" to the set of all subsets of X . This problem has been carried out in the tradition of the literature on extending an order on a set to its power set with the objective to analyze the axiomatic structure of families of rankings over subsets. In particular, most of these approaches make use of axioms aimed to prevent any kind of interaction among the objects in X . In this paper, we apply coalitional games to study the problem of extending preferences over a finite set X to its power set 2 X . . A coalitional game can be seen as a numerical representation of a preference extension on 2 X . . We focus on a particular class of extensions on 2 X. such that the ranking induced by the Shapley value of each coalitional game representing an extension in this class, coincides with the original preference on X . Some properties of Shapley extensions are discussed, with the objective to justify and contextualize the application of Shapley extensions to the problem of ranking sets of possibly interacting objects.

We present a system capable of automatically solving combinatorial logic puzzles given in (simplified) English. It uses an ontology to represent the puzzles in ASP which is applicable to a large set of logic puzzles. To translate the English descriptions of the puzzles into this ontology, we use a lambda-calculus based approach using Probabilistic Combinatorial Categorial Grammars (PCCG) where the meanings of words are associated with parameters to be able to distinguish between multiple meanings of the same word.