Psychologists and social scientists have been researching creativity in humans for several years, and it has gained the attention of artificial intelligence and robotics researchers as well. In this abstract, we discuss the emotional and conversational interface required for a humanoid robot to socially interact with children in order to learn new creative concepts. We briefly describe the approach we are taking to develop such a humanoid robot that can collaborate with children to discover creative concepts.

Important aspects of human cognition, like creativity and play, involve dealing with multiple divergent views of objects, goals, and plans. We argue in this paper that the current model of optimization that drives much of modern machine learning research is far too restrictive a paradigm to mathematically model the richness of human cognition. Instead, we propose a much more flexible and powerful framework of equilibration, which not only generalizes optimization, but also captures a rich variety of other problems, from game theory, complementarity problems, network equilibrium problems in economics, and equation solving. Our thesis is that creative activity involves dealing not with a single objective function, which optimization requires, but rather balancing multiple divergent and possibly contradictory goals. Such modes of cognition are better modeled using the framework of variational inequalities (VIs). We provide a brief review of this paradigm for readers unfamiliar with the underlying mathematics, and sketch out how VIs can account for creativity and play in human and animal cognition.

Shared mental models have been shown to improve human team performance. We thus conjecture that shared mental models (SMMs) integrated into cognitive robotic architectures might also improve the performance of mixed human-robot teams. To date, very little research has focused on developing appropriate computational constructs that can support domain independence and generalizability, while also being scalable. In this paper, we outline our proposed development of SMMs for cognitive robots.

Efforts to study computational aspects of the conscious mind have made substantial progress, but have yet to provide a compelling route to creating a phenomenally conscious machine. Here I suggest that an important reason for this is the computational explanatory gap: our inability to explain the implementation of high level cognitive algorithms that are of interest in AI in terms of neurocomputational processing. Bridging this gap could contribute to further progress in machine consciousness, to producing artificial general intelligence, and to understanding the fundamental nature of consciousness.

Can brain-mapping data be used to reverse engineer a brain Noam Chomsky discusses the evolution of the field of system in silico? This is actually the question of whether artificial intelligence from 1956, when John McCarthy consciousness is fully contained within the physical defined the science, until today (Ramsay, 2012). The goal structure that is the brain. Do the brain and its supporting of AI was to study intelligence by implementing its systems fully account for consciousness or are there other essential features using man-made technology. This goal components that transcend the body that are also at play? If has resulted in several practical applications people use metaphysical components play a role, then the answer is every day. The field has produced significant advances in negative, since mapping just the anatomical aspects of the search engines, data mining, speech recognition, image consciousness system would leave a critical component processing, and expert systems, to name a few.

Connecting the dots between discoveries in neuroscience(neuroplasticity), psychoneuroimmunology(the brain-immune loop) and user experience (gadget rub-off) indicate the nature of our time spent with gadgets is a vector in human health - mentally, socially and physically. The positive design of our interactions with devices therefore can have a positive impact on economy, civilization and society. Likewise, the absence of design that encourages positive interaction may encourage undesirable behaviors. Much like the architecture of physical spaces and buildings, the consequences of the architecture of the 21stcentury conversation between man and machine may last generations. AI and the Internet of Things are primary vectors for positive and negative impacts of technology.  We describe a growing body of co-discoveries occurring across a variety of disciplines that support the argument for human sciences in technology design.

Research in neurally-based machine (i.e. computational) systems is expanding. “Reverse-engineered” models of brain-like structures are viable candidates for developing increasing complexification (via generatively encoded “intelligence”) that could instantiate some form of consciousness – albeit not identical to human consciousness. This essay posits how such trajectories could lead to the iterative development of “machine sentience” and addresses issues of what “machine consciousness” might mean for: 1) the ways that humans regard such machine entities as “beings” and/or “persons”, and 2) philosophical, ethical and socio-legal positions which might need to be adapted to guide and govern human treatment of, and interactions with such entities. Herein, I argue that neuroethics contributes crucial insights and viable tools to any meaningful approach to this topic (in synergy with extant discourse in “robo-ethics”). As the fields of neuro- and cognitive science, and computational engineering become increasingly convergent, so too must the philosophical and ethical approaches that can – and should – be employed to direct what convergent science may create. The speed and breadth of such technological development are such that neuroethical address and engagement of these issues and questions must be equivalently paced and iterative, so as to retain preparatory value.

We sketch some reasons for thinking that modern formulations of mechanics might shed some light on old questions about human nature, in particular the malleability of human nature and the character of limits on cognition and volition. We illustrate the approach by showing how to regard certain forces that depend on mental states or the states of artificial controllers as interaction forces between minds or controllers and their environments, thus allowing physical measurement of some mental properties.

We examine some ways in which contemporary results from neural network theory can potentially contribute to a Buddhist understanding of emptiness. We also make some general remarks about the pitfalls and benefits inherent in attempting to apply ideas from artificial intelligence to an understanding of Buddhism.

For people constrained to picture based communication, the expression of interest in a question answering (QA) or information retrieval (IR)scenario is highly limited. Traditionally, alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) methods (such as gestures and communication boards) are utilised. But only few systems allow users to produce whole utterances or sentences that consist of multiple words; work to generate them automatically is a promising direction in the big data context.In this paper, we provide a dedicated access method for the open-domain QA and IR context. We propose a method for the user to search for additional symbols to be added to the communication board in real-time while using access to big data sources and context based filtering when the desired symbol is missing. The user can select a symbol that is associated with the desired concept and the system searches for images on the Internet - here, in Wikipedia - with the purpose of retrieving an appropriate symbol or picture. Querying for candidates is performed by estimating semantic relatedness between text fragments using explicit semantic analysis (ESA).