Two big recent revolutions: machine learning technologies; such as “deep learning” in Artificial Intelligence (AI), and personal genome informatics in biomedical science, provide us with new opportunities for understanding human happiness. Our ongoing important challenges are to discover our own truly meaningful personal happiness with the aid of AI and personal genome technologies. We have been developing a personal genome information agent entitled MyFinder, which supports searching for our inherited talents and maximizes our potential for a meaningful life. In the MyFinder project, we have provided a crowd-sourced DIY (Do it yourself) genomics research platform and conducted various “citizen science” projects in health and wellness. In this paper, we discuss how machine learning technologies and personal genome informat-ics might contribute to happiness sciences. We introduce the “Social Intelligence Genomics and Empathy-Building Study” and report the preliminary results of applying deep learning and six other machine learning algorithms for predicting social intelligence levels from nine SNPs genetic profiles. We dis-cuss the possibilities and limitations of applying machine learning technologies for personal happiness trait prediction. We also discuss future AI challenges in the context of wellbeing computing.

We have developed a visualization system of dementia care skills based on multimodal communication features. The purpose of our system is to provide effective learning of dementia care to trainees. As dementia care skills are difficult to visualize and describe, they are hard to acquire for trainees. We focus on HumanitudeR; a non-pharmacological comprehensive intervention with verbal and non-verbal communication, which is a care methodology of French-origin for the vulnerable elderlies. The multimodal methodology utilizes four techniques to relate to elderly with dementia (i.e., gaze, speak, touch, opportunities to stand on their feet). We analyzed the care videos of Humanitude instructors to extract multimodal communication features. We designed and filmed video contents demonstrating the extracted features. These have shown to be effective, in combination with practice and reflection, to acquire dementia care skills. The trainees could use the system for self-reflection and teaching.

Conference calls represent a natural but limited communication channel between people. Lack of visual contact and limited bandwidth impoverish social cues people typically use to moderate their behavior. This paper presents a system capable of providing timely aural feedback enabling meeting participants to check themselves. The system is able to sense and recognize problems, reason about them, and make decisions on how and when to provide feedback based on an interaction policy. While a hand-crafted policy based on expert insight can be used, it is non-optimal and can be brittle. Instead, we use reinforcement learning to build a system that can adapt to users by interacting with them. To evaluate the system, we first conduct a user study and demonstrate its utility in getting meeting participants to contribute more equally. We then validate the adaptive feedback policy by demonstrating the agent's ability to adapt its action choices to different types of users.

We revisit a series of studies on the work of multidisciplinary medical teams with a view to identifying opportunities for the use of intelligent systems to support their complex cooperative work, and the challenges that might arise in developing such systems. We focus specially on the activities performed during the multidisciplinary medical team meeting (MDTM) and review the literature on MDTMs, as well as our own longitudinal analysis of several MDTs in a large teaching hospital over a period of ten years.

Rules offer a convenient means of limiting the operational scope of our AI programs so as to not transgress predictable moral boundaries. Yet the imposition of an operational morality based on mere rules will not turn our machines into moral agents, just the unthinking tools of moral designers. If we are to imbue our machines with a profound functional morality, we must first gift them with a moral imagination, for empathic morality — where one agent treats another as it would want to be treated itself — requires an ability to project oneself into the realms of the counterfactual. In this paper we thus explore the role of the moral imagination in generating new and inspiring stories. The creation of novel tales with a built-in moral requires that an artificial system possess the ability to guess at the morality of characters and their actions in novel settings and events. Our moralizing tale-spinner — which generates Aesop-style tales about human-like animals with identifiable human qualities — also faces another challenge: it must render these tales as micro-texts that can be distributed as tweets. As we shall also use metaphor to lend elasticity to our moral conceptions, these short stories, rich in animal metaphors, will comprise part of the daily output of the @MetaphorMagnet Twitterbot.

We report here on our previous research on the evolution of commitment behaviour in the one-off and iterated prisoner's dilemma and relate it to the issue of designing non-human autonomous online systems. We show that it was necessary to introduce an apology/forgiveness mechanism in the iterated case since without this restorative mechanism strategies evolve that take revenge when the agreement fails. As before in online interaction systems, apology and forgiveness seem to provide important mechanisms to repair trust. As such, these result provide, next to the insight into our own moral and ethical considerations, ideas into how (and also why) similar mechanisms can be designed into the repertoire of actions that can be taken by non-human autonomous agents.

Humans need morality and ethics to get along constructively as members of the same society. As we face the prospect of robots taking a larger role in society, we need to consider how they, too, should behave toward other members of society. To the extent that robots will be able to act as agents in their own right, as opposed to being simply tools controlled by humans, they will need to behave according to some moral and ethical principles. Inspired by recent research on the cognitive science of human morality, we take steps toward an architecture for morality and ethics in robots. As in humans, there is a rapid intuitive response to the current situation. Reasoned reflection takes place at a slower time-scale, and is focused more on constructing a justification than on revising the reaction. However, there is a yet slower process of social interaction, in which examples of moral judgments and their justifications influence the moral development both of individuals and of the society as a whole. This moral architecture is illustrated by several examples, including identifying research results that will be necessary for the architecture to be implemented.

This paper and use of autonomous weapons systems has been will discuss the moral and ethical questions that arise in the one of the outcomes of the counterterrorism and counterinsurgency use of lethally autonomous technology for military purposes operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The asymmetrical and how the forms of subjectivity and moral agency that battlefields of these theaters, where no frontline it creates could be highly counterproductive to mission provides a buffer between combatants and civilians and effectiveness, diplomacy and conflict resolution and prevention.

This paper proposes a model for an artificial autonomous moral agent (AAMA), which is parsimonious in its ontology and minimal in its ethical assumptions. Starting from a set of moral data, this AAMA is able to learn and develop a form of moral competency. It resembles an “optimizing predictive mind,” which uses moral data (describing typical behavior of humans) and a set of dispositional traits to learn how to classify different actions (given a given background knowledge) as morally right, wrong, or neutral. When confronted with a new situation, this AAMA is supposedly able to predict a behavior consistent with the training set. This paper argues that a promising computational tool that fits our model is “neuroevolution,” i.e. evolving artificial neural networks.

Autonomization often follows after the automization on which it is based. More and more machines have to make decisions with moral implications. Machine ethics, which can be seen as an equivalent of human ethics, analyses the chances and limits of moral machines. So far, decision trees have not been commonly used for modelling moral machines. This article proposes an approach for creating annotated decision trees, and specifies their central components. The focus is on simple moral machines. The chances of such models are illustrated with the example of a self-driving car that is friendly to humans and animals. Finally the advantages and disadvantages are discussed and conclusions are drawn.