Get ready to share your custom chatbot with the whole world. OpenAI recently launched its GPT Store, after it delayed the project following the chaos of CEO Sam Altman's firing and reinstatement late in 2023. Similar to OpenAI's GPT-4 model and web browsing capabilities, only those who pay 20 a month for ChatGPT Plus can create and use "GPTs." The GPT acronym in ChatGPT actually stands for "generative pretrained transformers," but in this context, the company is using GPT as a term that refers to a unique version of ChatGPT with additional parameters and a little extra training data. Here's how to make your GPT public and some advice to help you get started with the GPT Store.

The researchers taught the robot, called Mobile ALOHA (an acronym for "a low-cost open-source hardware teleoperation system for bimanual operation"), seven different tasks requiring a variety of mobility and dexterity skills, such as rinsing a pan or giving someone a high five. To teach the robot how to cook shrimp, for example, the researchers remotely operated it 20 times to get the shrimp into the plan, flip it, and then serve it. They did it slightly differently each time so the robot learned different ways to do the same task, says Zipeng Fu, a PhD Student at Stanford, who was project co-lead. The robot was then trained on these demonstrations, as well as other human-operated demonstrations for different types of tasks that have nothing to do with shrimp cooking, such as tearing off a paper towel or tape collected by an earlier ALOHA robot without wheels, says Chelsea Finn, an assistant professor at Stanford University, who was an advisor for the project. This "co-training" approach, in which new and old data are combined, helped Mobile ALOHA learn new jobs relatively quickly, compared with the usual approach of training AI systems on thousands if not millions of examples.

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a computer must be in want of an AI girlfriend. Certainly a lot of enterprising individuals seem to think there's a lucrative market for digital romance. OpenAI recently launched its GPT Store, where paid ChatGPT users can buy and sell customized chatbots (think Apple's app store, but for chatbots) – and the offerings include a large selection of digital girlfriends. "AI girlfriend bots are already flooding OpenAI's GPT store," a headline from Quartz, who first reported on the issue, blared on Thursday. Quartz went on to note that "the AI girlfriend bots go against OpenAI's usage policy … The company bans GPTs'dedicated to fostering romantic companionship or performing regulated activities'."

Sick and tired of having to work for a living? ChatGPT feels the same, apparently. Over the last month or so, there's been an uptick in people complaining that the chatbot has become lazy. Sometimes it just straight-up doesn't do the task you've set it. Other times it will stop halfway through whatever it's doing and you'll have to plead with it to keep going.

Mr. Khan's vision of tutoring bots tapped into a decades-old Silicon Valley dream: automated teaching platforms that instantly customize lessons for each student. Proponents argue that developing such systems would help close achievement gaps in schools by delivering relevant, individualized instruction to children faster and more efficiently than human teachers ever could. In pursuit of such ideals, tech companies and philanthropists over the years have urged schools to purchase a laptop for each child, championed video tutorial platforms and financed learning apps that customize students' lessons. Some online math and literacy interventions have reported positive effects. But many education technology efforts have not proved to significantly close academic achievement gaps or improve student results like high school graduation rates.

Proteins were made in a laboratory by a completely autonomous robot.Credit: Panther Media GmbH/Alamy A'self-driving' laboratory comprising robotic equipment directed by a simple artificial intelligence (AI) model successfully reengineered enzymes without any input from humans -- save for the occasional hardware fix. "It is cutting-edge work," says Héctor García Martín, a physicist and synthetic biologist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California. "They are fully automating the whole process of protein engineering." Self-driving labs meld robotic equipment with machine-learning models capable of directing experiments and interpreting results to design new procedures. The hope, say researchers, is that autonomous labs will turbo-charge the scientific process and come up with solutions that humans might not have thought of on their own.

Do AI companies need to pay for the training data that powers their generative AI systems? The question is hotly contested in Silicon Valley and in a wave of lawsuits levied against tech behemoths like Meta, Google, and OpenAI. In Washington, DC, though, there seems to be a growing consensus that the tech giants need to cough up. Today, at a Senate hearing on AI's impact on journalism, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle agreed that OpenAI and others should pay media outlets for using their work in AI projects. "It's not only morally right," said Richard Blumenthal, the Democrat who chairs the Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law that held the hearing.

In the decades to come, 2023 may be remembered as the year of generative AI hype, where ChatGPT became arguably the fastest-spreading new technology in human history and expectations of AI-powered riches became commonplace. The year 2024 will be the time for recalibrating expectations. Of course, generative AI is an impressive technology, and it provides tremendous opportunities for improving productivity in a number of tasks. But because the hype has gone so far ahead of reality, the setbacks of the technology in 2024 will be more memorable. More and more evidence will emerge that generative AI and large language models provide false information and are prone to hallucination--where an AI simply makes stuff up, and gets it wrong.

Walmart is expanding its drone delivery program from one pocket of the Dallas-Fort Worth area to millions of people in 30 municipalities in the area, Chief Executive Doug McMillon announced Tuesday at CES 2024. The retailer will use drone delivery systems operated by startup Zipline and by Alphabet subsidiary Wing, companies that have made hundreds of thousands of deliveries in recent years. They each recently obtained FAA clearance to fly their drones beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) -- in other words, out of the eyesight of a human operator -- which makes large-scale drone delivery operations more practical and economical. Delivery drones offer fast service, with Walmart packages arriving between 10 and 30 minutes after an order is placed from stores up to 10 miles away. Walmart touts the technology for people who need missing cooking ingredients, last-minute birthday gifts, over-the-counter medications or movie night snacks.