Collaborating Authors


Decision Trees, Random Forests, AdaBoost & XGBoost in Python


In this section we will learn - What does Machine Learning mean. What are the meanings or different terms associated with machine learning? You will see some examples so that you understand what machine learning actually is. It also contains steps involved in building a machine learning model, not just linear models, any machine learning model.

Crossbreeding in Random Forest Artificial Intelligence

Ensemble learning methods are designed to benefit from multiple learning algorithms for better predictive performance. The tradeoff of this improved performance is slower speed and larger size of ensemble learning systems compared to single learning systems. In this paper, we present a novel approach to deal with this problem in Random Forest (RF) as one of the most powerful ensemble methods. The method is based on crossbreeding of the best tree branches to increase the performance of RF in space and speed while keeping the performance in the classification measures. The proposed approach has been tested on a group of synthetic and real datasets and compared to the standard RF approach. Several evaluations have been conducted to determine the effects of the Crossbred RF (CRF) on the accuracy and the number of trees in a forest. The results show better performance of CRF compared to RF.

Decision Trees, Random Forests, AdaBoost & XGBoost in Python


You're looking for a complete Decision tree course that teaches you everything you need to create a Decision tree/ Random Forest/ XGBoost model in Python, right? You've found the right Decision Trees and tree based advanced techniques course! How this course will help you? A Verifiable Certificate of Completion is presented to all students who undertake this Machine learning advanced course. If you are a business manager or an executive, or a student who wants to learn and apply machine learning in Real world problems of business, this course will give you a solid base for that by teaching you some of the advanced technique of machine learning, which are Decision tree, Random Forest, Bagging, AdaBoost and XGBoost.

Rule Covering for Interpretation and Boosting Machine Learning

We propose two algorithms for interpretation and boosting of tree-based ensemble methods. Both algorithms make use of mathematical programming models that are constructed with a set of rules extracted from an ensemble of decision trees. The objective is to obtain the minimum total impurity with the least number of rules that cover all the samples. The first algorithm uses the collection of decision trees obtained from a trained random forest model. Our numerical results show that the proposed rule covering approach selects only a few rules that could be used for interpreting the random forest model. Moreover, the resulting set of rules closely matches the accuracy level of the random forest model. Inspired by the column generation algorithm in linear programming, our second algorithm uses a rule generation scheme for boosting decision trees. We use the dual optimal solutions of the linear programming models as sample weights to obtain only those rules that would improve the accuracy. With a computational study, we observe that our second algorithm performs competitively with the other well-known boosting methods. Our implementations also demonstrate that both algorithms can be trivially coupled with the existing random forest and decision tree packages.

DART: Data Addition and Removal Trees Machine Learning

How can we update data for a machine learning model after it has already trained on that data? In this paper, we introduce DART, a variant of random forests that supports adding and removing training data with minimal retraining. Data updates in DART are exact, meaning that adding or removing examples from a DART model yields exactly the same model as retraining from scratch on updated data. DART uses two techniques to make updates efficient. The first is to cache data statistics at each node and training data at each leaf, so that only the necessary subtrees are retrained. The second is to choose the split variable randomly at the upper levels of each tree, so that the choice is completely independent of the data and never needs to change. At the lower levels, split variables are chosen to greedily maximize a split criterion such as Gini index or mutual information. By adjusting the number of random-split levels, DART can trade off between more accurate predictions and more efficient updates. In experiments on ten real-world datasets and one synthetic dataset, we find that DART is orders of magnitude faster than retraining from scratch while sacrificing very little in terms of predictive performance.

Ensemble Machine Learning in Python: Random Forest, AdaBoost


In recent years, we've seen a resurgence in AI, or artificial intelligence, and machine learning. Machine learning has led to some amazing results, like being able to analyze medical images and predict diseases on-par with human experts. Google's AlphaGo program was able to beat a world champion in the strategy game go using deep reinforcement learning. Machine learning is even being used to program self driving cars, which is going to change the automotive industry forever. Imagine a world with drastically reduced car accidents, simply by removing the element of human error.

A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management Machine Learning

Artificial intelligence has been applied in wildfire science and management since the 1990s, with early applications including neural networks and expert systems. Since then the field has rapidly progressed congruently with the wide adoption of machine learning (ML) in the environmental sciences. Here, we present a scoping review of ML in wildfire science and management. Our objective is to improve awareness of ML among wildfire scientists and managers, as well as illustrate the challenging range of problems in wildfire science available to data scientists. We first present an overview of popular ML approaches used in wildfire science to date, and then review their use in wildfire science within six problem domains: 1) fuels characterization, fire detection, and mapping; 2) fire weather and climate change; 3) fire occurrence, susceptibility, and risk; 4) fire behavior prediction; 5) fire effects; and 6) fire management. We also discuss the advantages and limitations of various ML approaches and identify opportunities for future advances in wildfire science and management within a data science context. We identified 298 relevant publications, where the most frequently used ML methods included random forests, MaxEnt, artificial neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, and genetic algorithms. There exists opportunities to apply more current ML methods (e.g., deep learning and agent based learning) in wildfire science. However, despite the ability of ML models to learn on their own, expertise in wildfire science is necessary to ensure realistic modelling of fire processes across multiple scales, while the complexity of some ML methods requires sophisticated knowledge for their application. Finally, we stress that the wildfire research and management community plays an active role in providing relevant, high quality data for use by practitioners of ML methods.

Bagging and Random Forest for Imbalanced Classification


Bagging is an ensemble algorithm that fits multiple models on different subsets of a training dataset, then combines the predictions from all models. Random forest is an extension of bagging that also randomly selects subsets of features used in each data sample. Both bagging and random forests have proven effective on a wide range of different predictive modeling problems. Although effective, they are not suited to classification problems with a skewed class distribution. Nevertheless, many modifications to the algorithms have been proposed that adapt their behavior and make them better suited to a severe class imbalance. In this tutorial, you will discover how to use bagging and random forest for imbalanced classification.

Contrast Trees and Distribution Boosting Machine Learning

Often machine learning methods are applied and results reported in cases where there is little to no information concerning accuracy of the output. Simply because a computer program returns a result does not insure its validity. If decisions are to be made based on such results it is important to have some notion of their veracity. Contrast trees represent a new approach for assessing the accuracy of many types of machine learning estimates that are not amenable to standard (cross) validation methods. In situations where inaccuracies are detected boosted contrast trees can often improve performance. A special case, distribution boosting, provides an assumption free method for estimating the full probability distribution of an outcome variable given any set of joint input predictor variable values.

Gradient tree boosting with random output projections for multi-label classification and multi-output regression Machine Learning

Multi-output supervised learning aims to model input-output relationships from observations of inputoutput pairs whenever the output space is a vector of random variables. Multi-output classification and regression tasks have numerous applications in domains ranging from biology to multimedia, and recent applications in this area correspond to very high dimensional output spaces (Agrawal et al, 2013; Dekel and Shamir, 2010). Classification and regression trees (Breiman et al, 1984) are popular supervised learning methods that provide state-of-the-art performance when exploited in the context of ensemble methods, namely Random forests (Breiman, 2001; Geurts et al, 2006) and Boosting (Freund and Schapire, 1997; Friedman, 2001). Classification and regression trees can obviously be exploited to handle multi-output problems. The most straightforward way to address multi-output tasks is to apply standard single output methods separately and independently on each output. Although simple, this method, called binary relevance (Tsoumakas et al, 2009) in multi-label classification or single target (Spyromitros-Xioufis et al, 2012) in multi-output regression is often suboptimal as it does not exploit potential correlations that might exist between the outputs. Tree ensemble methods have however been explicitely extended by several authors to the joint prediction of multiple outputs (e.g., Segal, 1992; Blockeel et al, 2000). These extensions build a single tree to predict all outputs at once. They adapt the score measure used to assess splits during the tree growth to take into account all outputs and label each tree leaf with a vector of values, one for each output.