We are interested in aggregating forecasts of multinomial problems elicited from multiple experts. A common approach is to assign a weight to each expert, then form a weighted sum over their forecasts. Theoretical studies suggest that an important factor in such weighting is the diversity among experts. However, diversity is intrinsically a pairwise measure over experts, and does not lend itself naturally to a single weight that can be applied to an expert’s forecast in a weighted average. We suggest a way to take advantage of such pairwise measures in aggregating forecasts.

There is strong theoretical evidence that aggregation of human judgments should not simply average multiple forecasts together (the unweighted linear opinion pool, or ULinOP), but weight them in such a way as to insure representation of a maximally diverse set of models among the experts from whom they are elicited. Explicitly eliciting these models places a major burden on the experts. We report on a variety of approaches to estimating these models, or at least the diversity among them, with minimal explicit input from the experts.

One common use for swarming agents is in social simulation. This paper reports on such a model developed to track protest activities at the May 2012 NATO summit in Chicago. The use of apoptotic stigmergic agents allows the model to run on-line, consuming two kinds of external data and reporting its results in real time.