Explainable Machine Learning in Deployment

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Explainable machine learning seeks to provide various stakeholders with insights into model behavior via feature importance scores, counterfactual explanations, and influential samples, among other techniques. Recent advances in this line of work, however, have gone without surveys of how organizations are using these techniques in practice. This study explores how organizations view and use explainability for stakeholder consumption. We find that the majority of deployments are not for end users affected by the model but for machine learning engineers, who use explainability to debug the model itself. There is a gap between explainability in practice and the goal of public transparency, since explanations primarily serve internal stakeholders rather than external ones. Our study synthesizes the limitations with current explainability techniques that hamper their use for end users. To facilitate end user interaction, we develop a framework for establishing clear goals for explainability, including a focus on normative desiderata.

Introducing AI Explainability 360 IBM Research Blog


The toolkit has been engineered with a common interface for all of the different ways of explaining (not an easy feat) and is extensible to accelerate innovation by the community advancing AI explainability. We are open sourcing it to help create a community of practice for data scientists, policymakers, and the general public that need to understand how algorithmic decision making affects them. AI Explainability 360 differs from other open source explainability offerings [1] through the diversity of its methods, focus on educating a variety of stakeholders, and extensibility via a common framework. Moreover, it interoperates with AI Fairness 360 and Adversarial Robustness 360, two other open-source toolboxes from IBM Research released in 2018, to support the development of holistic trustworthy machine learning pipelines. The initial release contains eight algorithms recently created by IBM Research, and also includes metrics from the community that serve as quantitative proxies for the quality of explanations. Beyond the initial release, we encourage contributions of other algorithms from the broader research community.

One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniques


As artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms make further inroads into society, calls are increasing from multiple stakeholders for these algorithms to explain their outputs. At the same time, these stakeholders, whether they be affected citizens, government regulators, domain experts, or system developers, present different requirements for explanations. Toward addressing these needs, we introduce AI Explainability 360 (http://aix360.mybluemix.net/), Equally important, we provide a taxonomy to help entities requiring explanations to navigate the space of explanation methods, not only those in the toolkit but also in the broader literature on explainability. For data scientists and other users of the toolkit, we have implemented an extensible software architecture that organizes methods according to their place in the AI modeling pipeline.

What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Use

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Translating machine learning (ML) models effectively to clinical practice requires establishing clinicians' trust. Explainability, or the ability of an ML model to justify its outcomes and assist clinicians in rationalizing the model prediction, has been generally understood to be critical to establishing trust. However, the field suffers from the lack of concrete definitions for usable explanations in different settings. To identify specific aspects of explainability that may catalyze building trust in ML models, we surveyed clinicians from two distinct acute care specialties (Intenstive Care Unit and Emergency Department). We use their feedback to characterize when explainability helps to improve clinicians' trust in ML models. We further identify the classes of explanations that clinicians identified as most relevant and crucial for effective translation to clinical practice. Finally, we discern concrete metrics for rigorous evaluation of clinical explainability methods. By integrating perceptions of explainability between clinicians and ML researchers we hope to facilitate the endorsement and broader adoption and sustained use of ML systems in healthcare.

Four Approaches to Explaining AI and Machine Learning


Advanced machine learning (ML) is a subset of AI that uses more data and sophisticated math to make better predictions and decisions. Banks and lenders could make a lot more money using ML on top of legacy credit scoring techniques to find better borrowers and reject more bad ones. But adoption of ML has been held back by the technology's "black-box" nature. ML models are exceedingly complex. You can't run a credit model safely or accurately if you can't explain its decisions.