Toward a Unified Artificial Intelligence

AAAI Conferences

To integrate existing AI techniques into a consistent system, an intelligent core is needed, which is general and flexible, and can use the other techniques as tools to solve concrete problems. Such a system, NARS, is introduced. It is a general-purpose reasoning system developed to be adaptive and capable of working with insufficient knowledge and resources. Compared to traditional reasoning system, NARS is different in all major components (language, semantics, inference rules, memory structure, and control mechanism).


Grounding the Meaning of Symbols on the System's Experience Pei Wang

AAAI Conferences

NARS is an intelligent reasoning system, whose interaction with its environment can be described as a stream of input sentences in a formally defined language and a stream of output sentences in the same language. These two streams are called the system's "experience" and "responses", respectively (Wang, 1994; Wang, 1995a; Wang, 1995b). Each sentence in the language represents an inheritance relation between two terms. By definition, a sentence "S C P" indicates that the subject term "S" is in the extension of the predicate term "P", and "P" is in the intension of "S". Because the relation "C" is defined to be reflexive and transitive, "S C P" also indicates that "S" inherits the intension of "P", and "P" inherits the extension of "S".


Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System (Version 4.1)

AAAI Conferences

NARS (Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System) is an intelligent reasoning system. It answers questions according to the knowledge originally provided by its user. What makes it different from conventional reasoning systems is its ability to learn from its experience and to work with insufficient knowledge and resources. The NARS 4.1 demo is a Java applet. It comes with help information and simple examples to show how the system does deduction, induction, abduction, analogy, belief revision, membership evaluation, relational inference, backward inference, new concept formation, and so on, in a unified manner. The demo also allows its user to create new examples to test the system, as well as to see the internal structure and process when the system is running. The online help document contains links to relevant publications. A previous version of the system, NARS 3.0, is described in detail in (Wang, 1995), which, and other related publications, are available at the author's web page.


Quasi-Topological Structure of Extensions in Logic of Determination of Objects (LDO) for Typical and Atypical objects

AAAI Conferences

This paper introduces and discusses a new algebraic structure, the quasi-topologic structure. The idea of this structure comes from language analysis on the one hand and from analysis of some real situations of clustering on the other. From the cognitive point of view, it is related to the Logic of Determination of Objects (LDO) and to the Logic of Typical and Atypical Objects (LTA) which is particular case of LDO. From the mathematical point of view, it is related to topology. By introducing the notion of internal and external border, it extends the notion of border from classical topology.


Insufficient Knowledge and Resources — A Biological Constraint and Its Functional Implications

AAAI Conferences

Insufficient knowledge and resources is not only a biological constraint on human and animal intelligence, but also has important functional implications for artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Traditional theories dominating AI research typically assume some kind of sufficiency of knowledge and resources, so cannot solve many problems in the field. AI needs new theories obeying this constraint, which cannot be obtained by minor revisions or extensions of the traditional theories. The practice of NARS, an AI project, shows that such new theories are feasible and promising in providing a new theoretical foundation for AI.